Hey no laughing - my point was that they support PHP, nothing more :P
On 6/23/06, Michael Stuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mick G schrieb:
> You can build a fully blown database driven site in Dreamweaver (allbeit
not
> perfect code)
LOL
___
Flas
Rails and JSON (http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/JSON+Webservice+Plugin)
-- because it's fun and your backend isn't bound to flash.
Regards,
Michael
On 6/22/06, Sajid Saiyed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer PHP with Flash.
I find many PHP functions very easy to do the job that could
I prefer PHP with Flash.
I find many PHP functions very easy to do the job that could take a
while doing within Flash.
I also feel PHP has a much larger support community.
-- Sajid
On 6/22/06, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I thought Bank of America was a "flagship" CF environme
>>I thought Bank of America was a "flagship" CF environment!
Bank of America has over 172,000 employees - so you can imagine we have
more than one server and more than one server admin. :) I haven't heard
CF mentioned once, but I've only been here 2 months. You sent those
Adobe links - that does
> I thought Bank of America was a "flagship" CF environment!
>
> http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestud
> ydetail&casestudyid=98723&loc=en_us
> http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/proven/
>
> But anyway, at this point I'm pretty much off-topic, so
> this'll be my las
It's even hard to convince my dad to install Ruby on our webservers.
Don't that I really /care/ about Ruby either,I don't really like the
syntax of it. I would prefer Python over Ruby for sure. But I would use
.NET anytime where possible. The problem I mainly have with CF is that
it needs a J2E
> I can't speak for Ruby, but unfortunately I've found CF is a
> much harder sell over .NET only because of the cost, whereas
> a lot of enterprises already have the infrastructure set up
> to handle .NET applications so they've essentially already
> paid for it. Plus, cost aside, convincing t
ion Effectiveness - Technology Solutions
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Watts
>>Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:38 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: RE: [Flash
Mick G schrieb:
You can build a fully blown database driven site in Dreamweaver (allbeit not
perfect code)
LOL
micha
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailm
"Macromedia doesn't support free technologies that are in direct
competition with their technologies. Why would they? "
I always wondered why MM support PHP in Dreamweaver but refuse to do so for
Flash with a PHP remoting.
You can build a fully blown database driven site in Dreamweaver (allbeit
> ColdFusion is a way for inexperienced coders to code
> middleware. CF is nowhere near as good as .NET, PHP, Java or
> Ruby. If you know how to code, don't waste your time with CF
> and dive right in to one of the far better middleware
> solutions (Ruby on Rails anyone?).
I would take issue
> But unless I am totally wrong, AMFPHP wasn't out of beta
> until recently.
> And it isn't officially supported by Adobe/MM, or if it is,
> it wasn't until recently. CF is.
Macromedia doesn't support free technologies that are in direct
competition with their technologies. Why would they? If
Depends on your knowledge level too
CF is dead easy to pick up - you can easily learn to create a CFC in no
time. The class based structure of PHP when creating a service throws a
couple people off in terms of scope resolution So depending on your
background if you know neither language,
wins, at least for me. Hence, the IMO.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dave
> > Watts
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:16 PM
> > To: Flashcoders mailing list
> >
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Jim Robson wrote:
I really don't think anything is faster to implement than CFCs and
Remoting.
You just build the CFC, set access=remote, and you're done on the
server
side.
I completely agree - especially when you are doing authentication and
serving conte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Dave Watts
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:16 PM
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
>
> > AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO
> AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
How so?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virgin
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sacks
| BLITZ
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:00 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than C
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
, June 21, 2006 2:44 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way opinions
Hi everyone:
There are differents ways to comunicate Flash Action Script with Data
Bases. One of the most used is XML generation trough PHP. I would like to
hear about differents ways
Take a look into amfphp and Flash Remoting at http://amfphp.org/
Mike Boutin
Jorge Antonio Diaz Gutierrez wrote:
Hi everyone:
There are differents ways to comunicate Flash Action Script with Data Bases.
One of the most used is XML generation trough PHP. I would like to hear about
differen
Hi everyone:
There are differents ways to comunicate Flash Action Script with Data Bases.
One of the most used is XML generation trough PHP. I would like to hear about
differents ways and opinions about it. What techniques you use?? and wichone is
the most powerfull??
Thanks you all.
22 matches
Mail list logo
