[Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux

2006-02-15 Thread Gerry Creighton
I searched the list for this info but didn't find anything. Does anyone know when the Flash 8.5 player will be available for Linux. I recently launched a site that requires Flash 8.0.22 and I've had a couple inquiries from some linux users. Thanks, Gerry

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux

2006-02-15 Thread John Dowdell
TIP: If you hit New Mail in your emailer and paste the mailing list address in, then you'll start a new thread and will be visible to other readers. (On this note you actually hit Reply to a conversation titled htmlText + rollover, so only people looking at uncollapsed threads will even seen

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux

2006-02-15 Thread Søren Christensen
...well not in my mail proggie :p On 15/2/06 23:02, John Dowdell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TIP: If you hit New Mail in your emailer and paste the mailing list address in, then you'll start a new thread and will be visible to other readers. (On this note you actually hit Reply to a

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux

2006-02-15 Thread Gerry Creighton
If I hit reply then delete the subject and retype the subject line and delete the body of the message it's going to the list as a new message. Why would it matter if I create a new message or do it the way that I did? Gerry On Feb 15, 2006, at 5:02 PM, John Dowdell wrote: TIP: If you hit

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux

2006-02-15 Thread Mark Winterhalder
On 2/16/06, Gerry Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I hit reply then delete the subject and retype the subject line and delete the body of the message it's going to the list as a new message. Why would it matter if I create a new message or do it the way that I did? no, it doesn't.

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux

2006-02-15 Thread Gerry Creighton
Ok thanks. Obviously I don't view mail that way so I didn't see any harm in sending as I did. I will from now on make a new message. Gerry On Feb 15, 2006, at 6:58 PM, Johannes Nel wrote: it doesn't. there are a whole bunch of other headers included in the message you are replying to and