> Well, by "switch" I just meant "new command line option". The obvious
form of that would be, as you say, just the ability to set the netperf
xfer size directly...
Yes. And let's remember why we're having this discussion - I asked why the
charts for very slow links had so little granularity.
Hi Toke,
> On Sep 29, 2019, at 21:08, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> wrote:
>
> flent-users writes:
>
> > Hi Toke,
> >
> >> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Rich Brown writes:
> >>
> >> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes
flent-users writes:
> Hi Toke,
>
>> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>> wrote:
>>
>> Rich Brown writes:
>>
>> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
>> > better plots (see below).
>>
>> Great!
>>
>> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a
Rich Brown writes:
> Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
> better plots (see below).
Great!
> Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz
> Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.
No, don't expect it would. The CPU usage thing will
Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much better
plots (see below). Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my
Mac 2.5 GHz Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.
Rich Brown writes:
>> Basically, the problem is the way netperf determines its data output
>> intervals in demo mode:
>
> Ahah! That was the explanation, but I wasn't (yet) smart enough to
> comprehend it. [To further test out my understanding... If netperf
> were to use a smaller "data output
> Basically, the problem is the way netperf determines its data output
> intervals in demo mode:
Ahah! That was the explanation, but I wasn't (yet) smart enough to comprehend
it. [To further test out my understanding... If netperf were to use a smaller
"data output interval" when it's
*answering the questions in the opposite order*
> Any suggestions as for where to put this so it's easy to find?
The bufferbloat.net site has an [RRUL Chart
Explanation](https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/RRUL_Chart_Explanation/)
page. I have always felt the Flent site could
Rich Brown writes:
> Here's an RRUL plot from my 7mbps/768kbps DSL circuit. The download
> has good granularity, while the upload plot seems only to have a
> half-dozen data points. This makes it seem faulty, or somehow
> different/disconnected from the other two plots.
>
> I think I once saw a
