--
--
Jules Suggate
Owner and Technical Lead
Uphill Sprint Limited
+64-21-157-8562
a application on based
on that idea in flash or flex.
Thanks,
kanu
--
--
Jules Suggate
Owner and Technical Lead
Uphill Sprint Limited
+64-21-157-8562
.
- Original Message -
*From:* kanu kukreja kanukukr...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:00 PM
*Subject:* [flexcoders] Application Idea
Hello,
I'm looking for an idea, so that i can create a application on based
on that idea in flash or flex.
Thanks,
kanu
--
--
Jules
] *On
Behalf Of *Jules Suggate
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:56 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [flexcoders] Common base class for components
Hi list, anyone know if it's possible to have all our components inherit
from a common base component of our own making
at 05:25, Fotis Chatzinikos
fotis.chatzini...@gmail.com wrote:
why do not you make your components implement an interface with these
methods you describe?
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Jules Suggate
julian.sugg...@gmail.comwrote:
Just to resume this thread, what I meant
:
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com, Jules
Suggate julian.sugg...@...
wrote:
Just to resume this thread, what I meant was to still use MXML and
all the
Flex components, but to introduce common functionality to all our
Views
(mxml files). Perhaps it's better to think
doing something wrong here?
Thanks for your help!
Ken
--
Cheers,
Jules
--
Jules Suggate
Owner and Technical Lead
Uphill Sprint Limited
+64-21-157-8562
Hey, a fellow Kiwi? Cool :) I am based out of Christchurch...
Having used Cairngorm plenty in the past, I always found it pretty
excellent, just a little out of date these days perhaps -- your changes
sound (IMHO) sane and reasonable, as does your decision to go with Cairngorm
if you are
Hi list, anyone know if it's possible to have all our components inherit
from a common base component of our own making?
There are some things in our app that every View component will have to do
at loadtime, and it'd be nice to just write that code once and have all the
other components inherit
.
Paul
- Original Message -
*From:* Jules Suggate julian.sugg...@gmail.com
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:36 PM
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Rounding error
Valdhor already gave you all the info you need, but I like the sound of my
own fingers
(at) computer.org
Web: www.thompsonz.net
-
--
Cheers,
Jules
--
Jules Suggate
Owner and Technical Lead
Uphill Sprint Limited
+64-21-157-8562
for TDD AFAIK.
Hope this helps :)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 21:23, Jules Suggate julian.sugg...@gmail.com wrote:
Having good results with FlexUnit here, using Parsley IoC instead of
Cairngorm or what-have-you because of the advantages to
mocking/testing with IoC/Dependency Injection (when
changing any widths and heights manually.
Thanks in Advance.
Poornima
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
--
Cheers,
Jules
--
Jules Suggate
Owner and Technical Lead
Uphill Sprint Limited
+64-21-157-8562
Funny, I have a very similar example at my end that I wrote just now
to prove to myself what was happening. I should have checked my email
first ;-)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 16:22, Paul Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a trivial example using dispatchEvent to show the synchronous
Sorry, I mean With /synchronous event dispatch/, triggering an event
100 times will mean the listeners get invoked 100 times, even if the
last invokation completely overwrites the work of the previous 99.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 23:31, Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For several years
Sorry, couldn't resist commenting on the term cognitive cruft! I love it! :))
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:37, Maciek Sakrejda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. I decided to actually try my test above, and on 100
items, the for-each version takes ~50 milliseconds, versus ~25
milliseconds
For several years before using flash I used a proprietary GUI OO tool that
had a similar (though less sophisticated) event mechanism. In that system
event dispatch did not actually take place until the code block had
completed - only then would handlers be invoked. This was particularly
Stay away from WCF and webservices unless you want the pain of arguing
with MS geeks about why they can't use SOAP 1.2..
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:01, Sceneshift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
When building larger applications with bigger database interactions, which
is considered
.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Parsley MVC :: some thoughts
boom head explodes heh!
I have been happily thinking the whole time that events really
- Original Message -
From: Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Parsley MVC :: some thoughts
How can something be asynchronous but not concurrent? Asynchronous
means that control returns from
] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 6:49 AM
Subject: [flexcoders] Parsley MVC :: some thoughts
Anyone used Parsley MVC? I'm a bit confused by it.
There's the standard MVC FrontController
Anyone used Parsley MVC? I'm a bit confused by it.
There's the standard MVC FrontController class, which exposes a method
dispatchEvent() for app-wide notifications. It also has a concept of
interceptors which is nice... so far so good.
BUT... that dispatchEvent() call executes *synchronously*.
Hi Ravichandran,
Yep, check out http://dougmccune.com/blog/2007/11/03/coverflow-flex-component/
:)
J
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 01:40, Ravichandran J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Friends,
Do any articles, books or video tutorials are there to leanr about coverflow
in flex.
Thanking you,
don't have any idea how Flex remove theses listeners. Maybe it is a
voodoo approach. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Marco, first up you have to ask yourself why you want this feature?
There may be another way to solve the problem. However
Hi Marco, first up you have to ask yourself why you want this feature?
There may be another way to solve the problem. However, here's what I
know of your specific question...
Last time I checked (Flex 3 beta 2) there was no *official* way to
inspect the bindings on a component at runtime.
Hi Tom,
You've hit on one of the classic anti-patterns of Flex programming:
Application.application.blah type stuff.
While this is regrettably somewhat 'normal', that doesn't mean it's ok
:) As you probably have guessed, it leads to code that is really hard
to change later on as it is all
Hi, looking for *any* way to consume SOAP 1.2 webservices (esp. WCF
ones with binding type wsdlHttpBinding) without requiring us to
handcode any of the interfaces on the client side
That means: we want to give some tool a WSDL URL, and then can code
against the webservice with no further work
Yeah, I second this suggestion. IViewCursor is your friend :)
And I know I haven't added much to the discussion -- but I want to
contribute, not just leech off everyone!
You guys are too quick to reply!
:)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 16:15, gabriel montagné
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Mon, Nov
Hi all,
I know this is a multennial subject, but I just checked Adobe's JIRA
and found three confirmed memory leaks in the Flex SDK :(
They are:
+ Memory leak in SWFLoader: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-18076
+ BindingUtils don't use weak event listeners, creating potential
memory
Bjorn, are you certified? Perhaps that's your problem ;^)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 21:57, Ashish Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I want to be Flex Certified. from where i can get the Demo Test Papers.
Thanks
Ashish
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:51 PM, bjorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried just doing [Bindable(dataChanged)] instead of
[Bindable(name=dataChanged)]?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 17:32, Michael Prescott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh sorry, I omitted the the getter from my example - but yes, I have
getters. (The IDE warns you that [Bindable] doesn't do
This is a good solution -- I was going to suggest that in the
handleMouseRollOver function you can check currentTarget to see if
it's an instance of UITextField, Label or whatever, thus waiting until
the event has bubbled to the grandparent. But that requires hardcoding
the types into an if(..)
there is something I don't know about the 'Plugin' version of the
installer. We are doing exactly this but we are targeting windows only (C#
app + Flash 9 ActiveX msi).
Steve
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi list, long-time-no-post :)
I've a gnarly
/)?
This would give you a bridge between your AIR application and the
local Java implementation.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com, Jules
Suggate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list, long-time-no-post :)
I've a gnarly one here.
I contract to a VC funded startup
luck negotiating a case by case runtime distribution
agreement with Adobe for bundling the AIR runtime with an AIR application?
Hope you guys can shed some light on this!
Cheers,
Jules
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 22:33, Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi, sorry for my late reply.
Merapi
/air-runtime-notice).
Has anyone had any luck negotiating a case by case runtime distribution
agreement with Adobe for bundling the AIR runtime with an AIR application?
Hope you guys can shed some light on this!
Cheers,
Jules
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 22:33, Jules Suggate [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yeah, we've accepted that already :) But perhaps I shouldn't throw
cross-platform around so loosely -- our initial Beta is Mac/Win only...
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:24, Tom Chiverton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Friday 21 Nov 2008, Jules Suggate wrote:
client. Unfortunately AIR's APIs
, not conjecture
based on Adobe's licensing page making passing reference)?
Hope this hits someone's cache!
Cheers,
Jules
--
Jules Suggate
Owner and Technical Lead
Uphill Sprint Limited
+64-21-157-8562
38 matches
Mail list logo
