On Wednesday 28 Nov 2007, ecmntech wrote:
Hello guys. Just want to ask, if there's any site or anybody have a
Apollo installer?
labs.adobe.com
Since AIR is for Flex 3.
Apollo was the code name for AIR. Same thing.
I'm using Flex Builder 2.0.1
That's nice.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to
I think the current guidance for the release of Apollo 1.0 is the
second half of 2007.
- Gordon
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Kellogg
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:29 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
apollocoders
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/apollocoders/
Adobe's Apollo Forum
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=72catid
=641
Sam
---
We're Hiring! Seeking a passionate developer to join our team building Flex
Hey Mike -
Can we assume that all the controls over PDF that
are exemplified in the Adobe Digital Edition will
be included in the full release of Apollo ?
Only thing I would like to see added to the API is
ability to apply animated effects to PDF pages. (
Page flip)
Ben Marchbanks
:::
The only plugins that will be supported for 1.0 is Flash and PDF.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Doberenz wrote:
This is more of a general question regarding capabilities of this class.
What kind of things in an HTML file will be displayable using this class?
What if an HTML file
Mark
What kind of 3D view do you need, could it be achived by utilising
Papervision3D which should be able to run in Apollo:
http://blog.papervision3d.org/
Andrew
On 24/03/07, Mark Doberenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more of a general question regarding capabilities of this class.
Yeah, I just saw that yesterday. It looks promising, but the whole
software renderer isn't going to quite cut it.
I work for a software company called Right Hemisphere and we have a free
3D viewer called Deep
Viewhttp://www.righthemisphere.com/products/deeppub/DeepPub_View/index.html.
This is
.
- Gordon
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ju Aedis
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:50 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication
Gordon:
if dispatchEvent() in a.mxml
You should read about LocalConnection. It's an old Flash API to communicate
between different flash movies
2007/3/22, Mark Doberenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been thinking about using Apollo for an extension to an app I've
been working on in Flex.
The current issue with the Flex app is
Oh yeah, I remember playing with those a long time ago... not the nicest
stuff to deal with from what I can remember.
Thanks
On 22 Mar 2007 14:28:43 -0700, Carlos Rovira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You should read about LocalConnection. It's an old Flash API to
communicate between different
I would go out on a limb and say yes.
Not in alpha but, if we are going to be able to addChild() on a newly
created window, I don't see why you could communicate with a window that you
created from the main app.
Peace, Mike
On 22 Mar 2007 14:32:13 -0700, Mark Doberenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection.
Just have one window broadcast an event, and have the other listen for it.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Schmalle wrote:
I would go out on a limb and say yes.
Not in alpha but, if we are going to be able to
how can the broadcast trasfer the info to listener?
use event.xxx = xxx?
2007/3/23, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection.
Just have one window broadcast an event, and have the other listen for it.
mike chambers
[EMAIL
Dang, that's a good idea I'll totally have a play with that one
tomorrow.
Thanks Mike!!!
On 3/22/07, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection.
Just have one window broadcast an event, and have the other listen for it.
, 2007 6:33 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication
how can the broadcast trasfer the info to listener?
use event.xxx = xxx?
2007/3/23, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Windows are all in scope, so you
@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication
how can the broadcast trasfer the info to listener?
use event.xxx = xxx?
2007/3/23, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection.
Just have one window broadcast
On Tuesday 20 Mar 2007, learner wrote:
I downloaded Apollo SDK zip and checked out its content. It contains :
..
Now, I am using flex builder to develop flex application.
You don't want the SDK download then, you want the plugin.
and how do I install
apollo runtime from SDK zip.
You can't
I downloaded the Apollo SDK before downloading the plugin for flexbuilder.
Now thinking that it should be possible to work with Apollo SDK and
flexbuilder
by copying the files from Apollo SDK to flex sdk in corresponding directory
and replacing the
mxmlc.jar in libs and version (as mentioned in
Mayur
You'll save yourself a lot of time and grief if you were to download
and install the plugin for Flex Builder, especially if you're already
using Flex Builder for development.
It's made to work seemlessly...
Andrew
On 20/03/07, learner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the
On Tuesday 20 Mar 2007, learner wrote:
Now thinking that it should be possible to work with Apollo SDK and
flexbuilder
by copying the files from Apollo SDK to flex sdk in corresponding directory
I installed a separate Flex SDK to the one that comes with Flex builder, and
updated that one
Thanks !
downloading the plugin .
Thanks once again for quick Replies.
Regards
On 20 Mar 2007 03:46:42 -0700, Andrew Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mayur
You'll save yourself a lot of time and grief if you were to download
and install the plugin for Flex Builder, especially if you're
: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs |
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
--
--
Andrew Muller
http
Schultheiss
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 10:31 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs |
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs |
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mesh/files/apollo/wallpaper/apollo_stickers.pdf
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weyert de Boer wrote:
Any chance you could send me picture of the Apollo logo?
yours,
On 3/18/07, Weyert de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance you could send me picture of the Apollo logo?
yours,
weyert
--
Brendan Meutzner
Stretch Media - RIA Adobe Flex Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stretchmedia.ca
apollo.PNG
Description: PNG image
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs |
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs |
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs |
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/
oh yeah boy!
On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo
I like the name Apollo myself, and I'm sure the Apollo team is
interested in the community's ideas about what the product should be
named, but picking a product name is a tricky business that involves
legal as well as marketing considerations.
Gordon
From:
Hi,
You need to be patient for a bit more to get the Apollo early releases.
But for now, start by using Flex. Everything in Flex will move to
Apollo seamlessly.
David
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of nboulet
Sent:
On 3/7/07, nboulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys :)
I've been reading this mailing list since quite a bit and I have a
question. Where can I start with Apollo development?
Hmm... I guess you missed the part about it not being released yet ;)
Sorry for being snarky, I just couldnt resist!
There is no public SDK as of yet.
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of nboulet
Sent: 07 March 2007 13:23
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start.
Hi guys :)
I've been reading this mailing
On Wednesday 07 Mar 2007, bruce1976 wrote:
Will Apollo be
bundled with a JVM
I'd say that's gonna be a no :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to quickly improve impactful systems
On: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
This email is sent for and
No.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bruce1976 wrote:
Hi,
Currently, Flex has an External API that allows a Flex app to call
javascript or an ActiveX control within the browser. Will Apollo be
bundled with a JVM and use an External API to call Java methods?
Thanks,
Bruce
Its not on Adobe Labs yet... but soon :)
Dimitrios Gianninas
Optimal Payments Inc.
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of nboulet
Sent: Wed 3/7/2007 8:23 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start.
Hi guys :)
I've
On Thursday 01 Mar 2007, Impudent1 wrote:
So am I to take this that Apollo will not let me deal with a remote
filesystem? If I cannot read/write files from a workstation to a server, or
deal with a remote data connection, Apollo suddenly seems really useless
for my app :(
You can always send
Oh yeah, did he say:
limited to 2g
As in a 2GB POST limit? That doesn't seem like much of a limit. I may
question the logic of posting a 2G file! If that's not the current limit,
what is?
Tom, what's the current method you're referring to, for 'sending' files to
server?
-Scott
On 3/2/07,
slangeberg wrote:
Oh yeah, did he say:
limited to 2g
As in a 2GB POST limit? That doesn't seem like much of a limit. I may
question the logic of posting a 2G file! If that's not the current limit,
what is?
fwiw , this is an internal video approval system app, and 2g is nothing for
even
Impudent1 wrote:
So am I to take this that Apollo will not let me deal with a remote
filesystem?
If I cannot read/write files from a workstation to a server, or deal with a
remote data connection, Apollo suddenly seems really useless for my app :(
There's no reason that you'd even need
Flash Player 9 already has all you need for building libraries to
connect to all sorts of remote filesystems: sockets, binary and
otherwise.
Agreed, I was hoping that Apollo would deal with the heavy lifting on some of
this stuff vs giving front end components was the main gist of my
Just taking a quick look and this concerns me:
Apollo provides a file I/O API that lets applications read and
write files and directories on the user’s computer...
The Flex framework for Apollo
includes components for working with files and directories,
but these are graphical components for
Uh, you're still going to have 'at least' all those capabilities (talking to
networked service) already existing in Flex.. What kind of functionality /
library / language are you comparing this to?
-Scott
On 3/1/07, Impudent1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just taking a quick look and this concerns
slangeberg wrote:
Uh, you're still going to have 'at least' all those capabilities
(talking to
networked service) already existing in Flex.. What kind of functionality /
library / language are you comparing this to?
Well I still have not seen how this will dovetail into the offline/online
Binary sockets, for one.. Any other ideas out there?
-Scott
On 3/1/07, Impudent1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slangeberg wrote:
Uh, you're still going to have 'at least' all those capabilities
(talking to
networked service) already existing in Flex.. What kind of functionality
/
library /
On Monday 05 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Apollo offers one or more offline data stores.
So does Flash - with SharedObject.
I believe the question was about an embedded database, i.e. can talk SQL.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to vitalistically promote sexy architectures
] la
part de Tom Chiverton
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 11:27
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
On Monday 05 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Apollo offers one or more offline data stores.
So does Flash - with SharedObject.
I believe the question was about
On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0.
Not HTML ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to apprehensively improve magnetic deliverables
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells
-
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
part de Jeffry Houser
Envoye : samedi 3 fevrier 2007 17:15
A : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
It seems to me there is a lot of speculation about Apollo, based on
very little actual
At 11:10 AM 2/4/2007, you wrote:
Many users are still disconnected. Nomad users are still common
place. Most sales people are getting out o the road in order to
create opportunities as opposed to staying in the office. Few rural
areas are 100% covered by high speed (wifi,gprs,gsm,3G) access.
He was referring to plugins that will be supported by the Apollo WebKit
engine.
Shan
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0.
Not HTML ?
I dont have the original thread, but I believe the question was, what
plugins are supported within HTML in Apollo.
The answer is Flash and PDF.
HTML is supported, but not as a plugin. It is a core part of the runtime.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 02 Feb
Apollo offers one or more offline data stores.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeffry Houser wrote:
Apollo offers an embedded DB? I haven't heard that yet.
: samedi 3 février 2007 16:39
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
Haven't replied too often, but this one struck a chord.
In real enterprise-level applications, you are split up into tiers. you
have presentation layer (which apollo/flex/flash/etc fits
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Shannon
Hicks
Envoyé : samedi 3 février 2007 16:38
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
You never said anything about this in your previous email. All you said in
your previous email
totally missing your logic here.
jason
-Message d'origine-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
la part de* Shannon Hicks
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo
-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Shannon Hicks
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I
can't
@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't
run your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's, use VB to build your app, and
don't tease me with the false hope of a cross-platform application by
building with Apollo
It seems to me there is a lot of speculation about Apollo, based on
very little actual knowledge. All this speculation of Apollo must
have x feature seems premature.
I don't Grok Apollo and don't expect to until there is an actual
product available or some documentation to read. Why
totally missing your logic here.
jason
-Message d'origine-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
la part de* Shannon Hicks
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo
de Shannon
Hicks
Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't run
your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's, use VB to build your app, and don't
tease
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:34 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
Hi,
This feature is KEY for our company too. We are developing
speech services (DLL based)...and we will use APOLLO if we can use
those DLLs...please, implement it on 1.0
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch native
local applications ?
As far as I know, Apollo is using webkit, does this include the ability
to run other plugins besides Flash (like Java)?
If so, can you use one of those other plugins
On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Kevin Newman wrote:
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
native local applications ?
As far as I know, Apollo is using webkit,
I would *expect* them to do that, did read something somewhere ?
does this include
To be honest... all this talk I've been hearing about Apollo being used as
desktop applications using web technologies... I would kinda expect that you
can launch exe passing parameters ( like CLI style or something similar ),
talk to dynamic libraries like .dll ( Windows ), .so ( Linux )...
.
jason
-Message d'origine-
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jerome
Clarke a.k.a sinatosk
Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
To be honest... all this talk I've been
You probably heard drag and drop into apollo (local file into app).
However, it should be possible to simulate drag from browser into apollo
app.
mikeh chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
I'm sure there was a quote about being able to drag applications of web sites
onto
Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0.
I will update the FAQ with the info.
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:developerfaq
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin Newman wrote:
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
Actually, that is not necessarily the case. If you look at our
descriptions of Apollo, we try to make it very clear that Apollo is
focused at bringing RIAs to the desktop. It is this use case that is
driving feature prioritization.
From the FAQ:
engaging user experiences.
jason
-Message d'origine-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Jerome Clarke
a.k.a sinatosk
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo
I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major
advantage.
It will still be possible to create platform specific Apollo apps, but
(at least for 1.0), when we prioritize features, we are going to
prioritize those which enable and encourage cross platform applications.
mike
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Chambers
Sent: sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major
advantage.
It will still be possible to create
:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Mike Chambers
*Sent:* sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major
On 2/3/07, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Technically, you could create PDFs within Apollo by doing it via
ActionScript, but we do have built in APIs for dynamically generating
PDF content.
wow.
Do you have an example of what you would like to do with generating PDF
content? (you
:* vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
To be honest... all this talk I've been hearing about Apollo being used
as desktop applications using web technologies... I would kinda expect that
you can launch exe passing parameters ( like CLI
%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com]
*On Behalf Of *Mike Chambers
*Sent:* sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't run
your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's, use VB to build your app, and don't
tease me with the false
On Wednesday 31 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
I think the scenario you described below would be possible without
having to launch an EXE
Well, yes, if mailto: HREF's are supported, but we may also want to fire up
VoIP interface apps etc. etc.
(although I would have to think about the pull
On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might
not make it in.
Well, we'd love to see the feature in (which is why I asked :-) ). Obviously
if you have this ability, you can write a trivial exe wrapper to get the
shared
I agree that this feauture is key for our company.
Please make it possible to call an exe and pass parameters!
On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might
not make it in.
Well, we'd love to see the feature in (which is
Hi,
This feature is KEY for our company too. We are developing
speech services (DLL based)...and we will use APOLLO if we can use
those DLLs...please, implement it on 1.0 !!!
Thanks
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that this feauture is key for our company.
I think the scenario you described below would be possible without
having to launch an EXE (although I would have to think about the pull
the app off your website).
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
That is one of the features
word. add my vote to being able to pass parameters to other exes
Impudent1
LeapFrog Productions
extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic libraries?
( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )
On 1/30/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
native
local applications ?
--
Tom Chiverton
If MDM Zinc can do it, then I expect Apollo to be able.
On 1/30/07, Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic
libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )
On 1/30/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might
not make it in.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
native
local applications ?
--
Tom Chiverton
No. That will not be in 1.0.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk wrote:
extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic
libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )
On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:20, devisbalsemin wrote:
have you some Apollo beta news?
Last I heard it was in closed beta. Under NDA.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to heterogeneously scale industry-wide developments
This email is sent for and
That's correct.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Chiverton
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:17 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo
On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:20, devisbalsemin
Apollo Wish Requests can go to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The number #1 wish for me is this: create flash applications that run
from CD (like a Flash Projector) WITHOUT the need to install anything
(like Flash Projector, but with more rights and more access to the
system).
--
You will be able
On Thursday 14 December 2006 10:29, Essl, Markus wrote:
I wanted to ask if there is a place for a wish list for Apollo. It is
christmas anyway!
http://adobe.com/go/wish
The number #1 wish for me is this: create flash applications that run
from CD (like a Flash Projector) WITHOUT the need to
Hi Markus,
DISCLAIMERI have not used Apollo yet, so I'm only working off of theories
based on what I have read and seen thus far./DISCLAIMER
I think apollo might be worth looking at, I'm not sure if it will satisfy your
basic need for not having to install onto a CD. From what I can gather
Until Apollo is real and proves to have the features you are requesting
(c++ extensibility??), the profile of your project says Director all
over it. At least if you are trying to keep within the Adobe product
line for software development. A Director shell, that is, which uses an
embedded
Have you thought about using zinc? http://multidmedia.com/
Can't see anything you mentioned below which is not already possible
with flash/flex + zinc
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Essl, Markus
Sent: 14 December 2006 10:30
95 matches
Mail list logo
