On Monday 05 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Apollo offers one or more offline data stores.
So does Flash - with SharedObject.
I believe the question was about an embedded database, i.e. can talk SQL.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to vitalistically promote sexy architectures
] la
part de Tom Chiverton
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 11:27
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
On Monday 05 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Apollo offers one or more offline data stores.
So does Flash - with SharedObject.
I believe the question was about
On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0.
Not HTML ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to apprehensively improve magnetic deliverables
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells
-
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
part de Jeffry Houser
Envoye : samedi 3 fevrier 2007 17:15
A : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
It seems to me there is a lot of speculation about Apollo, based on
very little actual
At 11:10 AM 2/4/2007, you wrote:
Many users are still disconnected. Nomad users are still common
place. Most sales people are getting out o the road in order to
create opportunities as opposed to staying in the office. Few rural
areas are 100% covered by high speed (wifi,gprs,gsm,3G) access.
He was referring to plugins that will be supported by the Apollo WebKit
engine.
Shan
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0.
Not HTML ?
I dont have the original thread, but I believe the question was, what
plugins are supported within HTML in Apollo.
The answer is Flash and PDF.
HTML is supported, but not as a plugin. It is a core part of the runtime.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 02 Feb
Apollo offers one or more offline data stores.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeffry Houser wrote:
Apollo offers an embedded DB? I haven't heard that yet.
: samedi 3 février 2007 16:39
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
Haven't replied too often, but this one struck a chord.
In real enterprise-level applications, you are split up into tiers. you
have presentation layer (which apollo/flex/flash/etc fits
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Shannon
Hicks
Envoyé : samedi 3 février 2007 16:38
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
You never said anything about this in your previous email. All you said in
your previous email
totally missing your logic here.
jason
-Message d'origine-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
la part de* Shannon Hicks
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo
-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Shannon Hicks
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I
can't
@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't
run your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's, use VB to build your app, and
don't tease me with the false hope of a cross-platform application by
building with Apollo
It seems to me there is a lot of speculation about Apollo, based on
very little actual knowledge. All this speculation of Apollo must
have x feature seems premature.
I don't Grok Apollo and don't expect to until there is an actual
product available or some documentation to read. Why
totally missing your logic here.
jason
-Message d'origine-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
la part de* Shannon Hicks
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo
: [flexcoders] Apollo features
So your saying it's better for a company to re create the wheel then to
leverage their existing investments. 80%+ of business applications are specific
to windows not leveraging that investment is just stupid.
So now if I have a client that wants to leverage Apollo I
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:34 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
Hi,
This feature is KEY for our company too. We are developing
speech services (DLL based)...and we will use APOLLO if we can use
those DLLs...please, implement it on 1.0
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch native
local applications ?
As far as I know, Apollo is using webkit, does this include the ability
to run other plugins besides Flash (like Java)?
If so, can you use one of those other plugins
On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Kevin Newman wrote:
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
native local applications ?
As far as I know, Apollo is using webkit,
I would *expect* them to do that, did read something somewhere ?
does this include
To be honest... all this talk I've been hearing about Apollo being used as
desktop applications using web technologies... I would kinda expect that you
can launch exe passing parameters ( like CLI style or something similar ),
talk to dynamic libraries like .dll ( Windows ), .so ( Linux )...
.
jason
-Message d'origine-
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jerome
Clarke a.k.a sinatosk
Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
To be honest... all this talk I've been
You probably heard drag and drop into apollo (local file into app).
However, it should be possible to simulate drag from browser into apollo
app.
mikeh chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
I'm sure there was a quote about being able to drag applications of web sites
onto
Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0.
I will update the FAQ with the info.
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:developerfaq
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin Newman wrote:
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
Actually, that is not necessarily the case. If you look at our
descriptions of Apollo, we try to make it very clear that Apollo is
focused at bringing RIAs to the desktop. It is this use case that is
driving feature prioritization.
From the FAQ:
engaging user experiences.
jason
-Message d'origine-
*De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Jerome Clarke
a.k.a sinatosk
*Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo
I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major
advantage.
It will still be possible to create platform specific Apollo apps, but
(at least for 1.0), when we prioritize features, we are going to
prioritize those which enable and encourage cross platform applications.
mike
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Chambers
Sent: sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major
advantage.
It will still be possible to create
:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Mike Chambers
*Sent:* sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major
On 2/3/07, Mike Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Technically, you could create PDFs within Apollo by doing it via
ActionScript, but we do have built in APIs for dynamically generating
PDF content.
wow.
Do you have an example of what you would like to do with generating PDF
content? (you
:* vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
To be honest... all this talk I've been hearing about Apollo being used
as desktop applications using web technologies... I would kinda expect that
you can launch exe passing parameters ( like CLI
%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com]
*On Behalf Of *Mike Chambers
*Sent:* sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features
The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't run
your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's, use VB to build your app, and don't
tease me with the false
On Wednesday 31 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
I think the scenario you described below would be possible without
having to launch an EXE
Well, yes, if mailto: HREF's are supported, but we may also want to fire up
VoIP interface apps etc. etc.
(although I would have to think about the pull
On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might
not make it in.
Well, we'd love to see the feature in (which is why I asked :-) ). Obviously
if you have this ability, you can write a trivial exe wrapper to get the
shared
I agree that this feauture is key for our company.
Please make it possible to call an exe and pass parameters!
On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might
not make it in.
Well, we'd love to see the feature in (which is
Hi,
This feature is KEY for our company too. We are developing
speech services (DLL based)...and we will use APOLLO if we can use
those DLLs...please, implement it on 1.0 !!!
Thanks
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that this feauture is key for our company.
I think the scenario you described below would be possible without
having to launch an EXE (although I would have to think about the pull
the app off your website).
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote:
That is one of the features
word. add my vote to being able to pass parameters to other exes
Impudent1
LeapFrog Productions
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch native
local applications ?
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in
extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic libraries?
( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )
On 1/30/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
native
local applications ?
--
Tom Chiverton
If MDM Zinc can do it, then I expect Apollo to be able.
On 1/30/07, Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic
libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )
On 1/30/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might
not make it in.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch
native
local applications ?
--
Tom Chiverton
No. That will not be in 1.0.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk wrote:
extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic
libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )
43 matches
Mail list logo
