Re: [flexcoders] I've got me data bindings in a terrible twist. FB2b3

2006-06-09 Thread Will Morgan
Hey Barry - thanks for the reply. I sort of get your explaination. ValueObjects and binding UI to them. But is it a two way street with results from a webservice? Do results bind to the VO as well?As you can tell - I'm not ready for Cairngorm yet! I've got to get down with screwing things up my

Re: [flexcoders] I've got me data bindings in a terrible twist. FB2b3

2006-06-09 Thread Barry Beattie
I sort of get your explaination. more experianced ppl will chime in with better explainations (just keep asking) As you can tell - I'm not ready for Cairngorm yet! and I'm still trying to keep up. S'ok. I guess it's time to buy that Flex book... carefullIIRC, one of the changes

[flexcoders] I've got me data bindings in a terrible twist. FB2b3

2006-06-08 Thread willmorganuk
Hi All - I'm getting really confused here. The help docs offer examples of binding webservice results to either UI components or objects, such as an ArrayCollection. This is all good and fine, but shouldn't I be binding these results to a model? And then bind UI comps to the model too? Here's

RE: [flexcoders] I've got me data bindings in a terrible twist. FB2b3

2006-06-08 Thread Barry Beattie
you mean like this? (from a cairngorm sample) 1) package com.mycompany.phones.model { [Bindable] [RemoteClass(alias=com.mycompany.phones.model.PhoneVO)] public dynamic class PhoneVO{etc my understanding: the data gets bound to an object (which