: [flexcoders] Re: Signed RSL penetration
Yes, that’s what it means unfortunately. I don’t have a info on
timing, it’s really up to them.
On 4/24/09 12:51 AM, Kenneth Sutherland kenneth.sutherl...@realise.com
wrote:
Does that mean that any swf you create that uses the flex
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Matt Chotin
Sent: 24 April 2009 21:52
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Signed RSL penetration
Yes, that's what it means unfortunately. I don't have a info on timing,
it's really up to them
[mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Matt Chotin
Sent: 23 April 2009 01:38
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Signed RSL penetration
This is due to Google not yet executing network requests from the SWF.
Something that they're working on.
Matt
On 4/21
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Signed RSL penetration
This is due to Google not yet executing network requests from the SWF.
Something that they're working on.
Matt
On 4/21/09 11:19 PM, bsyyu ben.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Apart from the size matter, we encounter the problem for Google
Apart from the size matter, we encounter the problem for Google engine working
with signed RSL matter , the result of Google Serach for the website that use
signed RSL with Error #2032. RSL Error 1 of 1. Any comments for this
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Matt Chotin mcho...@... wrote:
This is due to Google not yet executing network requests from the SWF.
Something that they're working on.
Matt
On 4/21/09 11:19 PM, bsyyu ben.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Apart from the size matter, we encounter the problem for Google engine working
with signed RSL matter , the result of
6 matches
Mail list logo
