RE: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel?

2006-04-18 Thread Peter Farland
You can't open many HTTP based connections from any client. Off the top of my head I think HTTP 1.1 suggests 2 connections and HTTP 1.0 suggested 4 connections. The flash player can't change this - it's up to what is configured on each OS. I see the batching as desired behavior because over a real

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel?

2006-04-18 Thread Peter Farland
The player team wouldn't change this before Flex is released. -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sof4real03 Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:01 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still n

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel?

2006-04-17 Thread Matt Chotin
Reduced network overhead, repeated information can be included in an outer envelope and you only take up one connection to the server instead of multiple. The server should therefore be able to handle more concurrent users. Matt -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel?

2006-04-17 Thread Matt Chotin
I'm pretty sure we consider this desired behavior. I will file an enhancement to turn off the batching but I doubt it will make it into Flex 2. Matt -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sof4real03 Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:01 PM

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel?

2006-04-17 Thread Peter Farland
Was that the workaround that involved using a unique endpoint URL to avoid connection sharing? If so, in FDS 2 you could create a new AMFChannel and assign it as part of a service's channelSet:ChannelSet property. import mx.messaging.ChannelSet; import mx.messaging.Channel; import mx.messaging.ch

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel?

2006-04-17 Thread Peter Farland
It isn't up to the Flex RemoteObject feature... it's how the flash player NetConnection works with AMF requests (and continues to work in FP 8.5). -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sof4real03 Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:15 PM To: