: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sof4real03
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:26 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
parallel?
If RemoteObjects results do not come back in parallel then how would
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
parallel?
Thanks Matt, this may be an ignorant question, but why would be a
desired behavior? It seems like a more desired behavior would be how
HTTPService or WebService responds is more desired...
Thanks,
Sof
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
parallel?
Does anyone know if this is a still an outstanding design of
RemoteObjects and AMF?
Much thanks,
Sof
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, sof4real03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've come
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
parallel?
Yes, that was the workaround. Is there look into changing the behavior
of NetConnection in the player before Flex is released for production?
By the way, thanks for the code tip.
- Sof
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of sof4real03
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:29 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
parallel?
Thanks Matt, this may be an ignorant question, but why would be a
desired behavior? It seems like a more
5 matches
Mail list logo
