.
As already mentioned, I find Cairngorm has a few things backwards, so I threw
together my own MVC thing.
regards,
Muzak
- Original Message -
From: Jorge Maiquez jmaiq...@yahoo.com
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:21 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention
Of Muzak
Sent: 07 August 2009 11:12
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
I don't have a ModelLocator, just one or more Models :) but yes, that's what
goes in the model package.
I have my own MVC framework, based on Cairngorm and ARP.
ARP
@yahoogroups.com flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
I don't have a ModelLocator, just one or more Models :) but yes, that's
what goes in the model package.
I have my own MVC framework, based on Cairngorm and ARP.
ARP is what I started out
Of Muzak
Sent: 07 August 2009 11:12
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
I don't have a ModelLocator, just one or more Models :) but yes, that's what
goes in the model package.
I have my own MVC framework, based
Ultimately the data should be in the model, and the view binds to the model.
However depending on your needs you could notify the view from the command
using responders. Check the UM Cairngorm extensions for this.
HTH,
Claudiu
From: Jorge Maiquez
to figure out whether I’m the only one who
thinks it’s weird :-)
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of claudiu ursica
Sent: 06 August 2009 14:23
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model
: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
What about transient data? I was always under the impression
that VO’s (or DTO’s or whatever they’re called) were more like throw-away
objects: you use them to transfer data to/from a server, but that’s it.
So if I label something as being
[mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of claudiu ursica
Sent: 06 August 2009 16:01
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
You are right, If your data is only transport stuff and then get rid of it it
does not justify to put
: Jorge Maiquez jmaiq...@yahoo.com
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2009 6:42:16 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
Ok, so if I’m understanding you correctly, you don’t have a
problem storing a VO in some part of the model (assuming that the VO
, August 06, 2009 10:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
Ok, so if I’m understanding you correctly, you don’t have a problem storing a
VO in some part of the model (assuming that the VO is used for both transport
and storage
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
Directory structure is just used for packaging. So, you keep all your views
together. But when you think about it, views rarely contain their own data.
Likewise, commands are in commands
1) the class only transfers data to/from a server: postfix VO and put it
in the vo folder
I'm working with someone who does (1) even when the class is never sent
across the wire.
That's what I do as well. Doesn't matter if it's meant for transfering data
to/from server or not.
They
- Original Message -
From: Jorge Maiquez jmaiq...@yahoo.com
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
@Claudiu
in you model? It won't even be in you project structure. it will
be from your libs where
[mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Muzak
Sent: 06 August 2009 21:02
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
1) the class only transfers data to/from a server: postfix VO and put it
in the vo folder
I'm working with someone who does
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Muzak
Sent: 06 August 2009 21:17
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
What if you have a class that is both a vo and a part of the model (the
situation I mentioned in my original post)?
Should you clone the vo
] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
don't belong in the model package though, that's where the model belongs,
not data classes
Erhm, then maybe I don't know what a model is :-)
Say, I have a list of users. I would create a userList ArrayCollection and
stick that into the model (bindable
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Muzak
Sent: 07 August 2009 03:14
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model?
Say, I have a list of users. I would create a userList ArrayCollection and
stick that into the model
17 matches
Mail list logo
