Re: [Flightgear-devel] VBOs - performance test results

2004-10-17 Thread Horst J. Wobig
Oliver C. wrote: Here are my results: With VBO enabled i get 150-195 frames/s With VBO disabled i only get 90-120 frames/s So VBO makes a difference of 60-75 more frames per seconds. I made this benchmark test on a computer with an Athlon Thunderbird 1 GHz CPU, 512 MB SDRam and a Geforce 4 4200

Re: [Flightgear-devel] VBOs - performance test results

2004-10-17 Thread Erik Hofman
Horst J. Wobig wrote: Oliver C. wrote: Here are my results: With VBO enabled i get 150-195 frames/s With VBO disabled i only get 90-120 frames/s So VBO makes a difference of 60-75 more frames per seconds. Before other people think WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!, please keep in mind that an

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs]CVS: data/Protocolacms.xml, NONE, 1.1

2004-10-17 Thread Norman Vine
Erik Hofman writes: Jon Berndt wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: Add a protocol for the ACMS protocol which seems to be used as an output format for black-box data flight data. This configuration does not work directly since there is no FDM available that reads the accelerations from the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] VBOs - performance test results

2004-10-17 Thread Frederic Bouvier
James Turner a écrit : On 17 Oct 2004, at 10:15, Erik Hofman wrote: Before other people think WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!, please keep in mind that an application like FG can't do everything just by using VBOs and DLists. For what it's worth, experts keep telling me the display lists are

Re: [Flightgear-devel] VBOs - performance test results

2004-10-17 Thread Erik Hofman
James Turner wrote: On 17 Oct 2004, at 10:15, Erik Hofman wrote: Before other people think WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!, please keep in mind that an application like FG can't do everything just by using VBOs and DLists. For what it's worth, experts keep telling me the display lists are

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiple instruments and systems, and configuration of these

2004-10-17 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
This is now in CVS. I would like to encourage aircraft maintainers to take a look at the two generic configurations in Aircraft/Generic/, and add/remove systems and instrumentation to their aircraft. Override the generic configurations in the same way as you overrice the generic autopilot: Add

[Flightgear-devel] FG aborting

2004-10-17 Thread Paul Surgeon
FG 0.9.6 and CVS won't run on my Mandrake 9.2 system. It keeps aborting when I try to run it (without displaying errors). GDB output (gdb) run Starting program: /home/paul/Dev/flightgear/bin/fgfs Program received signal SIG32, Real-time event 32. 0x4002b714 in pthread_getconcurrency ()

[Flightgear-devel] Submodels

2004-10-17 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
Hi all! I've not touched the new submodel.*xx sources yet because I want your opinion on how I should implement it into the other configurable systems. The existing configurable systems are the pitot, static, and vacuum systems. These are configured in one configuration file defaulting to

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FG aborting

2004-10-17 Thread Paul Surgeon
Hi guys I managed to narrow the problem down! Yay! If I remove the joystick drivers (sidewinder and joydev) so that my joystick is not detected then FlightGear loads then the problem disappears. So it seems as if something changed in the joystick code between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 that is causing a

[Flightgear-devel] Re: irc

2004-10-17 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 17 October 2004 23:53: These two channels are actually the same: $ host irc.linuxforen.de irc.linuxforen.de has address 83.246.114.104 $ host irc.flightgear.org irc.flightgear.org has address 83.246.114.104 BTW, that's actually my fault. I had

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels

2004-10-17 Thread Vivian Meazza
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: Sent: 17 October 2004 20:19 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels Hi all! I've not touched the new submodel.*xx sources yet because I want your opinion on how I should implement it into the other configurable systems.

[Flightgear-devel] Linux joystick problem following recent plib js updates

2004-10-17 Thread Eric L Hathaway
[I'm afraid I'm not subscribed to the plib devel list, so I hope that by posting this message here, the info will get passed on to the right person] I'm running FlightGear on an old linux box (RedHat 7.3) For the first time in a few months, I tried out a freshly updated version of FlightGear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux joystick problem following recent plib js updates

2004-10-17 Thread Oliver C.
On Monday 18 October 2004 05:44, Eric L Hathaway wrote: I'm running FlightGear on an old linux box (RedHat 7.3) For the first time in a few months, I tried out a freshly updated version of FlightGear this afternoon, with plib, SimGear, and FlightGear all pulled from CVS. I noticed that the

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux joystick problem following recent plib js updates

2004-10-17 Thread Eric L Hathaway
I'll reply to my own message to point out that my problem with FlightGear's joystick handling in Linux is not unique: Roy Vegard Ovesen noted the same root cause of this problem a few weeks ago in a posting to this list:

[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] f15.xml

2004-10-17 Thread Eric L Hathaway
The attached patch modifies the JSBSim config file for the f15. The patch does two things: 1) It increases the fuel load to nearly full internal fuel -- the current default load-up only has 100 lbs of fuel onboard and thus runs out of gas after less than a minute of flight time. Max internal