Re: [Flightgear-devel] CPU usage issue

2005-10-29 Thread Lee Elliott
Are you running on a dual processor/core system? LeeE On Friday 28 Oct 2005 01:41, Drew wrote: If you can throttle the frame rate when the window is open, can't it be throttled when it's minimized? When I have the window open, it runs at about 60% utilization, not 100. On 10/27/05, Andy

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear as a real time synthetic view

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis L. Olson
There is a neat flightgear connection here which I've probably mentioned before, but would like to mention again (with pictures.) http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Special/Rascal110_2/ This is a manually flown UAV (also pictured on the same page.) It has an onboard camera angled 45

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear as a real time synthetic view

2005-10-29 Thread Kitts
On Saturday 29 Oct 2005 11:50 pm IST, Curtis L. Olson wrote: CL There is a neat flightgear connection here which I've probably mentioned CL before, but would like to mention again (with pictures.) CL CL http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Special/Rascal110_2/ CL CL This is a manually flown

[Flightgear-devel] allow-toggle-cockpit

2005-10-29 Thread Dave Culp
Using CVS FlightGear I find that the s key switches instrument panels even when the property /sim/allow-toggle-cockpit is false. I see the key binding uses not in the condition test. Shouldn't the not not be there? Or not. Dave ___

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear as a real time synthetic view

2005-10-29 Thread Dave Martin
On Saturday 29 October 2005 19:20, Curtis L. Olson wrote: There is a neat flightgear connection here which I've probably mentioned before, but would like to mention again (with pictures.) http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Special/Rascal110_2/ This is a manually flown UAV (also pictured

[Flightgear-devel] wish list for next release

2005-10-29 Thread Dave Culp
Is it time to establish a wish list for the next release (or did I miss it?). Maybe this should be called a things to wrap up list, if it's too late for a wish list. BTW, I looked for a wish list at the flightgear.org website and found a goals page, which is a similar thing as a wish

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear as a real time synthetic view

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Dave Martin wrote: That is extremely nifty. Yes, I'm not sure what if anything it's good for, but it's definitely nifty. :-) I'm suprised you can get that sort of 'resolution' in the GPS/IMU downlink. The orientation probably comes out to within a degree or two, the GPS has a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear as a real time synthetic view

2005-10-29 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Kitts wrote: This looks brilliant! The synthetic view kinda looked brighter than the real thing in the picture ;-) Are you flying the craft through the computer's joystick or using a standard R/C? or even better, an autopilot system? Just curious! :-) We are currently flying 100%

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear as a real time synthetic view

2005-10-29 Thread Jeff McBride
On 10/29/05, Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a neat flightgear connection here which I've probably mentioned before, but would like to mention again (with pictures.) http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Special/Rascal110_2/ This is a manually flown UAV (also pictured on