Are we still using boost?
I'm sure I saw a post saying we didn't.
The FlightGear configure script still checks for it, SimGear doesn't.
Heh, and I went and removed boost from my system before compiling.
Darren
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMA
> John Wojnaroski wrote:
>
> Okay, I need a boost ;-0
>
> Downloaded the files. Tried the header files in several locations, but
> ./configure would not (could not) find them
> Is it /usr/include or ~/SimGear/ or ~/SimGear/simgear/ or
> /usr/local/include/ or..?
You can install them where e
Okay, I need a boost ;-0
Downloaded the files. Tried the header files in
several locations, but ./configure would not (could not) find them
Is it /usr/include or ~/SimGear/ or
~/SimGear/simgear/ or /usr/local/include/ or..?
Do you need more than the headers? like libraries,
or are the
> This doesn't mean much to me but it may be of some use. I have a
> feeling though that your compiler may be too old to compile boost. Is
> gcc 2.95 an option?
Erik put _huge_ effort into the project because GCC is definitely _no_
option on IRIX/MIPS. I know what I'm talking about because I sp
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Bernie Bright wrote:
>
>>
>> clib is a compatability library that comes with boost. I wasn't aware
>> of it until now. Its purpose is to provide the form of C
>> standard headers. Since its only 3K gzipped I've attached it here.
>>
>> I've also had a quick look at the boo
Bernie Bright wrote:
>
> clib is a compatability library that comes with boost. I wasn't aware
> of it until now. Its purpose is to provide the form of C
> standard headers. Since its only 3K gzipped I've attached it here.
>
> I've also had a quick look at the boost regression test suite an
Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> >> clib is new to me too, but I'm no irix expert. My guess is that it
> >> provides style headers which was reported as a problem by
> >> Erik. STLport appears the way to go though.
> >
> >
> > While I agree that STLPort may be a good thing, I'm a
Erik Hofman wrote:
>> clib is new to me too, but I'm no irix expert. My guess is that it
>> provides style headers which was reported as a problem by
>> Erik. STLport appears the way to go though.
>
>
> While I agree that STLPort may be a good thing, I'm a bit worried about
> the fact that
Bernie Bright wrote:
> "Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
>
>>Bernie Bright writes:
>>
>>>Erik Hofman wrote:
>>>
What should we do about this?
Erik
>>>Seems to be boost related. What compiler and platform? I seem to
>>>remember you are running an old IRIX system. Could you check
>
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
>
> Bernie Bright writes:
> > Erik Hofman wrote:
> > >
> > > What should we do about this?
> > >
> > > Erik
> > >
> >
> > Seems to be boost related. What compiler and platform? I seem to
> > remember you are running an old IRIX system. Could you check
> > http://www.bo
Bernie Bright writes:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
> >
> > What should we do about this?
> >
> > Erik
> >
>
> Seems to be boost related. What compiler and platform? I seem to
> remember you are running an old IRIX system. Could you check
> http://www.boost.org/status/compiler_status.html to see if
Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> What should we do about this?
>
> Erik
>
Seems to be boost related. What compiler and platform? I seem to
remember you are running an old IRIX system. Could you check
http://www.boost.org/status/compiler_status.html to see if your platform
is supported and if there ar
What should we do about this?
Erik
"/opt/include/boost/type_traits/arithmetic_traits.hpp", line 243: error(1029):
expected an expression
>::value));
^
"/opt/include/boost/type_traits/arithmetic_traits.hpp", line 254: error(1029):
expected an e
13 matches
Mail list logo
