On Sunday 16 Jan 2005 09:34, Christian Mayer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Curtis L. Olson schrieb:
> > I did another round with google adds today and here's what I've come up
> > with which seems (to me) like it could work out.
> >
> > 1. No adds at all on the main/f
On Sunday, 16 January 2005 13:37, David Megginson wrote:
> The challenge is all their third-party and warez sites.
If all of those sites are filtered out will there be any ads left to display?
What will be left over? Simulator hardware (yokes, pedals, etc)?
Paul
_
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:18:50 -0600, Curtis L. Olson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. No adds at all on the main/front page of our site. Adds only on the
> subpages.
Pro: good first impression on new users; con: kills nearly all of your
potential traffic.
> 2. I've had mixed results filtering out
Curt wrote:
> I did another round with google adds today and here's what I've come up
> with which seems (to me) like it could work out.
>
> 1. No adds at all on the main/front page of our site. Adds only on the
> subpages.
>
> 2. I've had mixed results filtering out MSFS stuff, but that's mos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis L. Olson schrieb:
> I did another round with google adds today and here's what I've come up
> with which seems (to me) like it could work out.
>
> 1. No adds at all on the main/front page of our site. Adds only on the
> subpages.
Sounds fair
I did another round with google adds today and here's what I've come up
with which seems (to me) like it could work out.
1. No adds at all on the main/front page of our site. Adds only on the
subpages.
2. I've had mixed results filtering out MSFS stuff, but that's mostly
because there is a lo
