Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: Gimp and small textures

2003-04-02 Thread Gerhard Wesp
I have one more question. Is it posible and how to specify color in postscript by RGB components? Have you looked at the language specification? http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/pdfs/tn/PLRM.pdf In case it's not in the core language, it should be trivial to define your own

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This leaves the plane running at startup, which will

Re: [Flightgear-devel] controls-bind()

2003-04-02 Thread Gerhard Wesp
strstream would do the trick, but not all compilers support it yet. Note that strstream is *deprecated* in C++, one should use stringstreams (sstream) instead. No danger of overflowing any buffers there. Cf. Josuttis, The C++ Standard Library, Section 13.11.2. AFAIK, every major platform now

Re: [Flightgear-devel] controls-bind()

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Hofman
Gerhard Wesp wrote: strstream would do the trick, but not all compilers support it yet. Note that strstream is *deprecated* in C++, one should use stringstreams (sstream) instead. No danger of overflowing any buffers there. Cf. Josuttis, The C++ Standard Library, Section 13.11.2. AFAIK, every

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Luff
On 4/2/03 at 10:04 AM Erik Hofman wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] controls-bind()

2003-04-02 Thread Bernie Bright
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:58:21 +0200 Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gerhard Wesp wrote: strstream would do the trick, but not all compilers support it yet. Note that strstream is *deprecated* in C++, one should use stringstreams (sstream) instead. No danger of overflowing any

Re: [Flightgear-devel] controls-bind()

2003-04-02 Thread Frederic BOUVIER
Bernie Bright wrote : STLport has sstream but I doubt if it could be extracted as a stand alone file. Have you (Erik) tried STLport on your system? If it works then we probably wouldn't need the simgear compatibility stuff anymore. Note that MSVC6 does not have sstream while I think VC7

Re: [Flightgear-devel] controls-bind()

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Hofman
Bernie Bright wrote: STLport has sstream but I doubt if it could be extracted as a stand alone file. Have you (Erik) tried STLport on your system? If it works then we probably wouldn't need the simgear compatibility stuff anymore. If it did work, I wouldn't have tried generating simething like

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
David Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On 4/2/03 at 10:04 AM Erik Hofman wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the

re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? Is that not where they used to be? If not, we can put them back. All the best, David -- David

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Eye Candy

2003-04-02 Thread Stefan Champailler
Now I want all the planes rendered with that ! stF Norman Vine wrote: If you have a machine to run this on :-) http://www.daionet.gr.jp/~masa/rthdribl/index.html Norman ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: No, they were at 0, which is what makes sense. Ah -- they must have been set to 2 in the individual aircraft config files, then. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ ___

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson wrote: The magnetos are now defaulted to position 2 (Left) instead of 0 (Off). Was that intentional? Is there anything else in global preferences not mentioned in the log? I think the magnetos have been in position 2 for a while. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Wilson
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson writes: No, they were at 0, which is what makes sense. Ah -- they must have been set to 2 in the individual aircraft config files, then. He he...this is what happens when you start a reply to a mailing list and then finish it 30

Re: [Flightgear-devel] controls-bind()

2003-04-02 Thread Gerhard Wesp
Note that MSVC6 does not have sstream while I think VC7 does. Correct. I guess MSVC6 is the only platform which doesn't have sstream? Is there any specific reason why FG has to support a compiler more than 5 years old? Regards, -Gerhard -- | voice: +43 (0)676 6253725 *** web:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question on tuesday's preferences.xml update

2003-04-02 Thread David Megginson
Jim Wilson writes: On question though, should they have been set to 3? Yes, they should -- I was a little confused about the whole thing (that's the problem with using integers rather than string tokens). I have no problem putting them back to 0 in preferences.xml, if that's the way they were

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: Gimp and small textures

2003-04-02 Thread Andy Ross
Martin Dressler wrote: So it mean that gimp use bad antialiasing or render lines in some bad way. Because Gimp scale with the same quality as ImageMagic. But are you starting with an image of 1024x1024 or higher? If you try to edit at the final resolution, you really can't avoid seeing

[Flightgear-devel] wrong version of base

2003-04-02 Thread Howell Caton
After dealing with 1000 failed dependencies and much gnashing of teeth, I've finally succeeded in compiling Flightgear-0.9.1 on my redhat 8.0 machine. I then cd'd to /usr/local/lib and did: tar zxvf /home/hcaton/fgfs-base-0.9.1a.tar.gz as per the instructions. But now when i do this:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] wrong version of base

2003-04-02 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Try ./fgfs --fg-root=/usr/local/lib/FlightGear/data this is a change in the base package layout which is kind of mid-stream. Curt. Howell Caton writes: After dealing with 1000 failed dependencies and much gnashing of teeth, I've finally succeeded in compiling Flightgear-0.9.1 on my redhat