I did a little research this afternoon dont know if it is of any use.
Using the old airport file with Fredric's MSVC 9.2 version of 11 June I
tried KSFO rwy 28L10R,KOAK rwy 27L2911 and YSSY(Sydney Australia) rwy 16R
34L in all cases the A/C lined up smack down the middle of the runway.
I then
Jim Wilson writes:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This came from Siggraph 2003 as did this cloud paper from MS
http://ofb.net/~eggplant/clouds/CloudsInGames_NinianeWang.pdf
Hmmm...some interesting hints in there.
Indeed, I esp like the super impostor
i.e the 'distant' clouds
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, David Megginson wrote:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Can you list a specific example?
CYRP.
Sorry, I probably wasn't clear in my question. What about CYRP is not
correct?
The plane starts far before the threshold and to the right of the
centreline.
Norman Vine writes:
Jim Wilson writes:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This came from Siggraph 2003 as did this cloud paper from MS
http://ofb.net/~eggplant/clouds/CloudsInGames_NinianeWang.pdf
Hmmm...some interesting hints in there.
Indeed, I esp like the super
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
Jim Wilson writes:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This came from Siggraph 2003 as did this cloud paper from MS
http://ofb.net/~eggplant/clouds/CloudsInGames_NinianeWang.pdf
Hmmm...some interesting hints in there.
Jim Wilson writes:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This came from Siggraph 2003 as did this cloud paper from MS
http://ofb.net/~eggplant/clouds/CloudsInGames_NinianeWang.pdf
Hmmm...some interesting hints
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further to Curt's last post about flattening rivers, how would
everyone feel about flattening airports?
When you look at large airports, say with runways over 3 km, you'll find
quite a few where the runways follow the terrain at least over a difference
Martin Spott writes:
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further to Curt's last post about flattening rivers, how would
everyone feel about flattening airports?
When you look at large airports, say with runways over 3 km, you'll find
quite a few where the runways follow the terrain
Don't recall the specific change in height of the two runway ends, but KMRY
has quite a downslope change toward the West as one real world example.
jj
For what it's worth, when I was looking into this, I found some
examples of runways with their ends literally at least 100' different
in
Some good examples of un-flat runways:
KATL ( especially 8R, concave )
San Jose, Costa Rica ( steep slope, strong visual illusion )
Guatemala City, Guatemala ( very concave runway )
On a related note, here are some airports that the FAA considers special, as
of 1990, and why:
I have been fiddling around with the scenery building tools to
incorporate 30m SRTM data for N/S america, updated/current
airport/runway data based on the latest DAFIF cycle, updated taxiways,
lighting, and approach data, etc. Also included is vmap0 roads,
railroads, rivers, lakes, landc
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Can you list a specific example?
CYRP.
Sorry, I probably wasn't clear in my question. What about CYRP is not
correct?
The plane starts far before the threshold and to the right of the
centreline.
David, I lined up
Hello,
I have following Software installed:
- Debian Unstable (latest packages)
- g++ -v does return:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.2/specs
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang
--prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
Is this possible to stop? This could start a lavine (mass mailing)...
:-(
On Thursday 04 September 2003 09:37 pm, you wrote:
Hi. I'm currently on leave and won't be available till the 15'th of
September.
Please refer any urgent matters to Mark Petrusma, or Rob Anderson.
Regards,
Themie
A left click will automagically return you to the 'forward view'
In Falcon, we always had face turned forward in inside view when coming
back from the outside one. When switching from inside to outside one,
the outside was left alone though.
I think this is very reasonable because in 99%
Curtis L. Olson writes:
For what it's worth, when I was looking into this, I found some
examples of runways with their ends literally at least 100' different
in elevation. Most aren't nearly that far off, but there are a
few.
For a 10,000 ft runway, that would require less than a 1%
Martin Spott writes:
Further to Curt's last post about flattening rivers, how would
everyone feel about flattening airports?
When you look at large airports, say with runways over 3 km, you'll find
quite a few where the runways follow the terrain at least over a difference
in the
Curtis L. Olson writes:
David, I lined up fine in the yf23-yasim with the scenery I generated
last night.
I'll try rebuilding the airports with the latest CVS, then.
Thanks,
David
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I have been fiddling around with the scenery building tools to
incorporate 30m SRTM data for N/S america, updated/current
airport/runway data based on the latest DAFIF cycle, updated taxiways,
lighting, and approach data, etc. Also included is vmap0 roads,
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
For what it's worth, when I was looking into this, I found some
examples of runways with their ends literally at least 100' different
in elevation. Most aren't nearly that far off, but there are a
few.
For a 10,000 ft runway,
Norman Vine writes:
Have you tried preinserting some of the the higher res srtm1 data
to terra innide of and on the edges of the airport polygons ?
This shoud be quite accurate.
Maybe *too* accurate -- at the resolution, a 747 parked on the field
will start to show up in the
David Megginson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
Have you tried preinserting some of the the higher res srtm1 data
to terra innide of and on the edges of the airport polygons ?
This shoud be quite accurate.
Maybe *too* accurate -- at the resolution, a 747 parked on the field
will
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I have been fiddling around with the scenery building tools to
incorporate 30m SRTM data for N/S america, updated/current
airport/runway data based on the latest DAFIF cycle, updated taxiways,
lighting, and approach data, etc. Also
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
David Megginson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
Have you tried preinserting some of the the higher res srtm1 data
to terra innide of and on the edges of the airport polygons ?
This shoud be quite accurate.
Maybe
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 16:15:48 -0500
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes.
Curt.
Is it worth a new screen shot?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
??
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like extracting a particular set of fields from each line
of an input stream.)
I'd recommend learning perl or python or both as replacements. :-)
Curt.
--
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
All the best,
David
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild guess here: I'll bet you and Curt
didn't do to well in multiple choice tests in school?
;-)
Jon
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like extracting a particular set of fields from each line
of an input stream.)
I'd recommend
Tony Peden writes:
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like extracting a particular set of fields from each line
of an input
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
??
Well I'm going to throw in the old it depends on what you are doing. Since
I've been around longer than perl, I still use awk for a lot of one line
stuff. For example it often works better than xargs (piped out
Recently I experimented a little with AC3D, PPE and Blender and I was
wondering how big one has to make a model to have it at the appropriate
height when rendered by FG. If I want it to be 380 feet (the Rembrandttower
in Amsterdam), how many grid-squares is 380 feet? Or can I rescale a model
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
For what it's worth, when I was looking into this, I found some
examples of runways with their ends literally at least 100' different
in elevation. Most aren't nearly that far off, but there are a
few.
For a 10,000 ft runway, that
On Thursday 04 September 2003 23:39, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild guess here: I'll bet you and Curt
Lee Elliott writes:
On Thursday 04 September 2003 23:39, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild
Did I mention this link yet?
http://www.web-discovery.net/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 22:06, Jon Berndt wrote:
Did I mention this link yet?
http://www.web-discovery.net/
Very cool!
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
Tony
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:06, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like
39 matches
Mail list logo
