Innis Cunningham wrote:
Ok Eric
Have you separated the A/C bits and named them ready for animation and
have you redone the texturing.
No. The only reason I created an ac3d file was to animate the heat-cones
behind it. The model does have separate aero surfaces and such, but
without a name
Norman Vine wrote:
Awesome view of Hurricane Isabel just touching the East Coast
of the US http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/
This evening the outer fringes of the storm were overhead here
on Cape Cod 42.3N 71.7W and was as spectacular a sunset as I
have ever seen. note center of
Erik Hofman writes
I don't mind, you just will lose the heat-cone animation. If you got
something ready, you can sent it to me and I'll put it in CVS.
Erik
Ok I will download the animation xml and add the other animations to it
might be a few days.
By the way what is the difference between
Innis Cunningham wrote:
By the way what is the difference between the T-38 and the T-5.
I think you mean the F-5?
The T-38 is the trainer version of the F-5.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a programmer living in Sao Paulo (Brazil) and dont have (yet) large
experience with OpenGL, now I am reading the *Red Book* and trying to
understand the SimGear and FG code. My only experience (indirect) with
OpenGL comes from my work with the team of the new Blender Python API.
You're
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:57:44 +0200,
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Innis Cunningham wrote:
By the way what is the difference between the T-38 and the T-5.
I think you mean the F-5?
The T-38 is the trainer version of the F-5.
..and the F-5B? ;-)
Hi all
Several recent patches that were checked in with the following
log entry
This patch is there to correct a problem that prevent to load static objects when
specifying
a relative fg-root or a different, relative, fg-scenery.
It appears that there is a mix between fg-root, fg-scenery
Norman Vine wrote:
Several recent patches that were checked in with the following
log entry
This patch is there to correct a problem that prevent to load static objects when
specifying
a relative fg-root or a different, relative, fg-scenery.
It appears that there is a mix between
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes
Well I'm not sure exactly what the problem is.
Hi Jim.
You just need to add the call to fgUpdateLocalTime()
as below
Cheers
Norman
// $FG_SRC / Time / tmp.cxx
// update sky and lighting parameters
void
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Norman Vine wrote:
Several recent patches that were checked in with the following
log entry
This patch is there to correct a problem that prevent to load static objects when
specifying
a relative fg-root or a different, relative, fg-scenery.
It
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
Hmmm. I just redid some testing with a different current directory (c:/)
and an absolute FG_ROOT (d:/flightgear/cvs/fgfsbase) and I don't
see any problem.
Hmmm how are you launching FGFS
Can you tell me what is your exact test case ?
Sure - Here are pertinent
Norman Vine wrotes:
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
And a dumb question : have you updated and recompiled SimGear ?
I hope that 17-Sep-2003 7:11:50p is recent enough GMT +5
Hmm.. Checking simgear / scene / model / model.cxx
I see a minor differance then what is in the CVS
recompiling
Norman Vine wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
And a dumb question : have you updated and recompiled SimGear ?
I hope that 17-Sep-2003 7:11:50p is recent enough GMT +5
Hmm.. Checking simgear / scene / model / model.cxx
I see a minor difference then what is
Norman Vine wrote:
Norman Vine wrotes:
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
And a dumb question : have you updated and recompiled SimGear ?
I hope that 17-Sep-2003 7:11:50p is recent enough GMT +5
Hmm.. Checking simgear / scene / model / model.cxx
I see a minor differance then what is
Hi,
Over the course of the last year I've been trying
to find simulation hardware (MCP,EFIS,EICAS,etc) that works with Linux and would
support open source programs like FlightGear and OpenGC. All I could find was
Windows stuff ( EPIC, FSUIPC, etc). And there did not seem to be a lot of
Jim Wilson wrote:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes
Well I'm not sure exactly what the problem is.
Hi Jim.
You just need to add the call to fgUpdateLocalTime()
as below
Gadds!...ok...then what currently triggers that update so that the values
happen to be correct by the
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:45:14AM +0200, Erik Hofman wrote:
Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
When trying to start fgfs --airport=KEMT I get:
WARNING: ssgLoadAC: Failed to open
'/fg_root/Aircraft/c172/Models/c172-dpm.ac/Aircraft/c172/Models/c172-dpm.ac'
for reading
with current
Erik Hofman writes:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well I'm not sure exactly what the problem is.
You just need to add the call to fgUpdateLocalTime()
as below
Gadds!...ok...then what currently triggers that update so that the values
happen to be correct by
Title: Message
You
might want to take a look at www.microchip.com who do the PIC
microcontroller. They will usually send free samples. They provide a
great IDE. Also they do a USB chip. I do a bit of PIC development
myself - mostly LCD, MIDI and keyboard interfaces. I've been meaning to
19 matches
Mail list logo
