Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
On Freitag 25 November 2005 04:28, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Ignore what I wrote in my last E-mail. I didn't realize I have errors when
compiling.
Whatever we end up here, I think that somebody with such hardware available
should try to reproduce this with a
On 25 Nov 2005, at 00:33, David Luff wrote:Thanks, that's great! Would you prefer me to upload it to SourceForge for download from there, or to simply provide a link to your webspace?There's no problem with leaving it in my webspace, but you may as well add it to SF -that way you get SF's
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
SimGear really isn't designed to be a shared library anyway -- the
various libsg*.a files just match the directory structure of the
source code. As Alex pointed out, they have complicated dependency
relationships that are going to be difficult to manage.
Index: ../../SimGear/source/simgear/environment/metar.cxx
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/environment/metar.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -b -u -p -r1.7 metar.cxx
---
Index: ../../FlightGear/source/src/ATC/AIMgr.cxx
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/ATC/AIMgr.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -b -u -p -r1.29 AIMgr.cxx
--- ../../FlightGear/source/src/ATC/AIMgr.cxx 11 Nov 2005
This is just a pinpointing portion of the patch, as it doesn't fix
anything -- since it's all in the JSBsim, and that one is about
to be overridden with another upstream version. Please apply nevertheless
so that we have it in the fgfs code, until that happens --- it's just
comments change.
This is to announce the 3-part patch I have just submitted to the list.
It has been split as follows:
1.
http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-November/040968.html
SimGear-level changes
2.
http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-November/040969.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vassilii Khachaturov schrieb:
What has been done in the patch:
* whenever an exception object was created on a stack and then thrown
(thus causing the dtor for that object to fire!), it was replaced
with a STATIC exception object use in the same
As I said, producing a panther build should be doable by someone with
Panther, or if you get many complaints, I can set up a cross-build
environment to target Panther myself; I'm just being lazy on the assumption
flight sim users are probably early-ish adopters and already have Tiger...
I wonder: what does actually happen when you create a static object in
the middle of a method?
Same as if you create it in the beginning of the method :-) it gets
initialized before it's first used, that's guaranteed; whether
it's actually done before the function first runs or before the
block
* Vassilii Khachaturov -- Friday 25 November 2005 15:11:
* whenever an exception object was created on a stack and then thrown
(thus causing the dtor for that object to fire!), it was replaced
with a STATIC exception
The whole thing looks like a solution desperately searching for a
problem.
* Vassilii Khachaturov -- Friday 25 November 2005 15:11:
* whenever an exception object was created on a stack and then thrown
(thus causing the dtor for that object to fire!), it was replaced
with a STATIC exception
The whole thing looks like a solution desperately searching for a
I wonder what compiler was JSB using in his string throwing example,
can you please re-read that thread and see if you can find an alternative
explanation?
Vassilii
I use Borland C++, and the g++ compiler in the cygwin distribution. I also
compile under a
flavor of Linux, just to see what
* whenever an exception object was created on a stack and then thrown
(thus causing the dtor for that object to fire!), it was replaced
with a STATIC exception
The whole thing looks like a solution desperately searching for a
problem. The reasoning for this patch contradicts
I use Borland C++, and the g++ compiler in the cygwin distribution. I
also compile under a flavor of Linux, just to see what happens. I've
been worried that try/catch/throw is something that is not supported
similarly on different compilers.
I've got other priorities right now, but please
James Turner writes:
On 25 Nov 2005, at 00:33, David Luff wrote:
Thanks, that's great! Would you prefer me to upload it to
SourceForge for download from there, or to simply provide a link to
your webspace?
There's no problem with leaving it in my webspace, but you may as
Hi,
On Freitag 25 November 2005 00:11, pmaclean wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I am new to Flightgear so please
bear with me. I am not sure how unref is applicable here.
Sorry, I thought of reference counting in the scenegraph ...
Also, I thought 0.9.8 was the latest release other than
Hello.
I've tried to compile FG with this patches. But there is a problem
to compile it because
no errno is declared in those files.
I don't know, how it is mentioned, I'm not up to the code. I don't
know how to fix it cleanly. So please, can you post the correction?
Thank you.
BTW. Paste the
I've tried to compile FG with this patches. But there is a problem
Dear Ladislaw,
thank you very much for your help in testing this.
to compile it because
no errno is declared in those files.
I don't know, how it is mentioned, I'm not up to the code. I don't
know how to fix it cleanly. So
On November 25, 2005 01:35 am, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
I got the following errors when doing a make-install. What do I need to
change?
It looks like the RenderTexture stuff is not found at all. Did you get a
compile error during RenderTexture compiles too?
Greetings
Mathias
I
I have re-worked the patch into a shorter one.
It has been split as follows:
1.
http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-November/040968.html
SimGear-level changes
Please see the attached simgear-except.diff for the new version of
these, or
Hi!
Could you direct me to some good online documentation about ATC and
aerodynamics of a helicopter?
Szabi
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Szabolcs Berecz wrote:
Hi!
Could you direct me to some good online documentation about ATC and
aerodynamics of a helicopter?
Szabi
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
I just made up a tutorial about making gear retraction animations run
smoothly with complicated landing gears. It's still missing the final
animation code, but I thought I'd throw it up to see what everybody
thinks. It's got lots of in-line images, so be warned. I'm considering
changing this to
Szabolcs Berecz writes:
Could you direct me to some good online documentation about ATC and
aerodynamics of a helicopter?
I've sent a (probably too large) private email containing:
NACA Technical Note 4357 - Lift and Profile-Drag Characteristics of an
NACA 0012 Airfoil As Derived From Measured
Szabolcs Berecz writes:
Could you direct me to some good online documentation about ATC and
aerodynamics of a helicopter?
Okay, I said I was going to email them privately, but then I looked at
a 32MB email in my outbound queue and realized that that was beyond
bad form.
See:
Szabolcs Berecz writes:
Could you direct me to some good online documentation about ATC and
aerodynamics of a helicopter?
Okay, I said I was going to email them privately, but then I looked at
a 32MB email in my outbound queue and realized that that was beyond
bad form.
See:
On 26/11/05, Dan Lyke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flutterby.com/danlyke/helicoptersimnotes/MinimumComplexityHelicopterSimulationMathModel.pdf
http://www.flutterby.com/danlyke/helicoptersimnotes/naca-report-824.pdf
http://www.flutterby.com/danlyke/helicoptersimnotes/naca-tn-4357.pdf
28 matches
Mail list logo
