On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:23:56 -0700
Russell Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon S Berndt wrote:
But then, the FDM still has to report where the FDM is in a common
reference frame.
Exactly! At my company, we call this the control point and we have
standardized on the Empty Weight CG.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:22:15 -0800
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Can the view offset or rendering code (whatever it is that draws the
3D aircraft models) move the origin of the set of vertices that
defines the model per-frame so that the CG aligns with that repor
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:15:19 -0600
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, Microsoft filed their patent on Dec. 1, 2000. The CVS entry
you reference was from Apr. 6, 2001. Can you beat the December date?
--
Cameron Moore
Probably.
Jon
___
Fli
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:07:05 -0800
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adding the VRP is yet another mechanism, basically a direct analog of
the view offset stuff on the FDM side. I just don't see the need. If
we decide the VRP is the right way to do it, we should chuck the view
offset stuff for
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:56:46 +0100
Mathias Fröhlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even JSBSim CVS does not support this visual reference point yet.
There is a
patch pending in Jon's mailbox to report the visual reference point
to
flightgear and define a reference point in each JSBSim aircraft
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:19:25 -
"Vivian Meazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon S Berndt tells us
First, the aircraft - like any body - rotates about its CG
(according to the EOM) - not usually the same as the AC.
So put the (visual) model origin at or near the CofG - wha
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:35:59 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon S Berndt wrote:
I'm not sure I see how this helps -- the model code still doesn't
know where the CG is, so it still doesn't know where the centre of
rotation for the model should be.
This i
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:36:13 -0500
Josh Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has all got me thinking a bit. This subject seems to come up
quite a bit, and frankly I have found it a dificult problem too. In
addition, there are some related things that can get hard as well
like placing the w
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:15 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, given that the aerodynamic centre of an aircraft can shift based
on loading and flight conditions, how can we report that from the FDM
back to the 3D model code? Is this something people worked out in a
previous
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:50:48 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You actually want to be very exact about matching the model to the
FDM origin.
...
Jim (or someone ... *anyone*):
Could you summarize the argument taking place here? I seem to only be
getting parts of it - I guess I did
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:06:41 -0800
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Norman Vine wrote:
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> It is thought that the use of a RAM disk might help.
On Windows I have found that increading disk cache size and / or
using memory mapped files is more productive then a DA
Is anyone aware of a RAM disk utility or feature under Unix
(specifically, IRIX)? When running a simulation on IRIX we are
finding that the disk access is taking too much time at various phase
boundaries. It is thought that the use of a RAM disk might help.
Jon
__
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:39:23 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curt fixed that today. It even works pretty well with the 747. With
the one
he commited, the gain is higher than what you have (Kp=1.0), a little
longer
intergration period (Ti=25.0) and the derivator is way down to almo
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:39:16 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerhard Wesp) wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for good resources on flight simulations. For the
aerodynamics and flight dynamics it seems that Stevens, Aircraft
Control and Simulation, is (one of) the standard references. Things which
Stevens does
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:42:02 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point (as is Jon's) but in all such design cases there are tradeoffs.
What I'm looking at is ease of configuration and that may be a
reasonable
tradeoff against the limitations of defining a standard set of
control
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:21:19 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That has nothing at all to do with what I said. We are controlling
individual
control surfaces. Period. I don't think we should have subclasses
for each
desired action/process. Only each control surface type. Roll
c
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:19:27 -0800 (PST)
Gene Buckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had BuilderX installed for a couple of months. Unless it's
_really_ well hidden, there is no RAD tool attached to it. It's just
a fancy>cross-platform IDE. It is my understanding that you have to
cough up seri
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Gene Buckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless it's different from the downloaddable version, it does _not_
include any kind of RAD tool.
g.
You are probably thinking of the free Borland C++ 5.5 compiler. The
link I provided refers to the Personal Edition o
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:15:41 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree as well. An autopilot driven by the gyro compass should
reflect all of the compass's error's, such as drift; ditto for an AP
driven by a VOR receiver. If we want to model an AP driven by a GPS,
INS, and/or F
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:09:02 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW (and hopefully this doesn't mean major breakage) I've been
considering some changes to the autopilot infrastructure to make it
more flexible. For instance, we (or at least I) could really use a
mode to hold sp
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:04:32 +
"David Luff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm happy to talk if we do get a slot.
Cheers - Dave
Would it be advantageous -- not only now, but for the future -- for
major subsystem "leads" to write up a short monologue? For instance,
if there was a concise writeup
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:24:42 +0100
"Hof Markus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah. Fine. So you left away the setto feature? Does not matter, I'm
sure noone will miss it.
What I don't understand is, how you reset the previous inputs? Which
application uses this? Can you send me the final FGFilter.* p
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:38:06 +0200
Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excellent!
Now go spend some time with your kids Jon. ;)
No kidding. Tonight is "library night", so I will be spending some
time with the older ones. :-)
What would be really useful and helpful is a step-by-step tutorial
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:44:27 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is an open issue with JSBSim because it has the concept of a
"center brake" which doesn't directly map to the standard cockpit
controls. Right now I hardwire that to a value of zero.
That may be a misstep on o
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:58:35 +0200
Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2004 23:34, Jon S Berndt wrote:
Paul:
We (FDM) simply report the location of the
reference point (I think we agreed it would be the forward-most
position of the aircraft, like the prop hub t
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:39:20 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this should be implemented in the jsbsim source code, not in
the fdm_config xml file.
Yes. And it is true there probably should be an initialization
capability for filters, integrators, etc. I'll try and lo
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:52:28 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, note that the derivative part of the example wing leveler
control was a complete guess - and I think it actually may not play a
large part (or *any* part) in the maintaining wings-level at all.
I have also con
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:24:15 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the solution I'm looking to implement, but sadly my knowlege
about the jsbsim structure is so limited that I could not think of a
way to do it. Maybe the SWITCH component could be used as an if
structure?
Ye
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:52:28 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The solution to this is to stop the intergation when the actuator
goes into saturation.
Aha! Good explanation. Yes, I think this should not be too hard to
fix, but I don't have time to play with that myself at this
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:09:08 +0100
Hof Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Take the A320 (on FG) and watch the ball. All I want to know, which
property to use for trigger function to keep the ball centered.
since you discussed this topic so deeply, I'm sure someone can name
me the property...
I've
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:37:25 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Believe it or not, what makes an airplane turn is LIFT... think
about it.
Same thing -- one wing develops more lift than the other, the plane
banks and wants to slip sideways, but as it does th
Dell doesn't seem to market machines with Linux installed anymore, do
they?
Can anyone point me to a major manufacturer that does?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:41:00 +0100
"Hof Markus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other topic: Are there any suggestions about how to build a d/d(t) of
a property in fdm
markus
Markus:
For JSBSim, you can use the flight control components. This is a
quick reply, so maybe I have not thought this all t
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:34:44 +0100
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Shucks ... I must be tired or something because this is getting more
and more confusing by the minute.
What is this "arbitrary point" you are referring to?
It is a location which you can choose. You ca
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:56:27 +0100
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon Berndt wrote:
For JSBSim aircraft, of course, you can by adding in the appropriate
control
channel in the flight control description for hte aircraft. I think
eromatic automatically adds a yaw damper to aircraft creat
I believe we (JSBSim team) will soon have a rudimentary model of the
Martian environment integrated within JSBSim. This leads me to a
question about FlightGear/SimGear: What is the potential for modeling
a planetary body that is different from earth in the following ways:
1) Different radius
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:34:15 -0800
"John Wojnaroski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In JSBSim, for a 747, we would associate both left main gear with
the
left brake input, etc.
Let's not forget that the higher end equipment also has stuff like
anti-skid
systems which determine when/where and how th
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 10:12:26 -0800
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That convention only works for tricycle gear airplanes with three
wheels, though. The problem is that the current input mappings map
the following properties to those values:
/controls/wheel/gear[0]/brake -- "left"
/controls/
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:12:21 -0800
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But the hard part is that this only works for YASim. I think the other
FDMs get their control inputs indirectly, via the FGControls
C++ class, instead of out of the property tree. This code would have to
be modified before
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:59:06 +0200
Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The minus sign on an INPUT in a JSBSim FDM causes FlightGear to
crash.
I know the INVERT keywork is being depreciated but it doesn't look
like the
minus sign is working too well at the moment.
You probably don't have the
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:49:30 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David, (Andy?)
It appears that in the latest cvs, we have lost the ability to control
the engines independently. Previously you could type
... etc. to select an engine. Then '{' and '}'
would select the magnetos.
Thinking of the X-15 and its flight profile: does FlightGear do any
sky darkening as the aircraft flies up past 100,000 feet altitude? It
doesn't seem to me that it would be that hard to do.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Thanks for the overwhelming response to my request for dot. I now
have what I need. I'll be trying it out this evening or weekend on
the sourceforge site. The dot utility is useful in creating the
diagrams such as those seen in the JSBSim documentation I uploaded to
the JSBSim.org site. I h
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:42:06 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This should settle the issue:
!GASP!
He fell OFF!
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's the way Boeing USED to make them.
Compare that cockpit to a new 737-800 ...
The new cockpits must make pilot's lives pretty boring.
Paul
http://tinyurl.com/xkxh
Yep.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing l
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 23:56:34 -0600
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon S Berndt) [2003.11.27 20:37]:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:11:26 +
Matthew Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10:47 Thu 27 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
>> Yeah, but then y
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:11:26 +
Matthew Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10:47 Thu 27 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
Yeah, but then you'd get a fight over which flag is put in first and
which flag is shows just for 0.1 usec (e.g. the last flag) ...
Erik
Maybe randomise the order ?
All the bes
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:22:28 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FlightGear logo on the top of the website.
Yes, I know. I am familiar with it: I made it. :-)
What don't you like about it?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:38:58 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
1.the design of the website is really good now, but I think we need a
new logo. I´m sure there are enough people with painting skills among
us. Just post some ideas or pictures!
A new logo?
Jon
___
A good article on the National Geographic web site:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0312/feature1/index.html
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:49:58 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
1. The default log level is now FG_ALERT, or at least, it's supposed
to be (though some FG_WARN messages inexplicably still get
through).
What about the presumptively "useful" stuff like the JSBSim to
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:27:04 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David,
Now I'm imagining a script that sets up all the initial conditions
(altitude, speed, pressure, temp, etc.) as well as specfic logging
fields, flies an FAA certification test, logs the results, and graphs
the re
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:16:57 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahaha!
Aeromatic is *for* the end user. The next simplest thing would be
to
fly to wherever the user is and hold their hand as they type.
Jon
LOL, I'm free this Sunday if you are, Jon
I'm booked for the rest of my life. My wife kee
http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/aeromatic.html
I don't see the concorde button (?!?)
:-)
Curt.
Luckily, of all aircraft, the Concorde ought to be very easily modeled
using DATCOM - which I have.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:07:45 -0600
"Jon S Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:01:45 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Someone needs to whip up a quick flight dynamics model for it. :-)
Curt.
http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/aer
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:01:45 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Someone needs to whip up a quick flight dynamics model for it. :-)
Curt.
http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/aeromatic.html
:-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:33:35 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Again, I'm wondering if this is an aerodynamic problem (aside from
the bouncing-around-sitting-still thing). Because of its lifting
surfaces, a plane is certainly more vulnerable to the wind than a car,
even when it is
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:03:39 +0100
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While the wheel dynamics allow the wheels to move sideways easily,
the landing gear dynamics does not allow the landing gear to move
sideways (easily).
So apart from the the individual wheel dynamics we also need to
calc
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:20:42 -0800 (PST)
Gene Buckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any interest in getting that detailed on the W&B calcs? When
duplicating a real-world instrument, the weights are easily available
and a "generic" weight could be assigned to avionics that don't model a
speci
Is there any designed rhyme or reason to the layout of the properties
from the top down in FlightGear? Any particular conventions? I think
there ought to be something written down if there is not in order to
allow the FDM authors (and others) to splice in nicer.
Jon
___
Suggestion: for debugging purposes (if nothing else) it would be
useful to have this command:
fgfs --version
also spit out info on other pertinent version numbers, e.g. for:
plib
simgear
jsbsim
yasim
etc.
JSBSim has this available in a header file, and IIRC it is also
available in a function
Is there a README, FAQ, or manual on making instruments for a panel
and/or creating the panel itself?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:38:23 -0500
"John Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking at creating a new protocol module to handle the low level
details of the connection, and a hud overlay like the OLK code to
handle
Here's a red herring - er ... I mean side note:
One thing I've been playing a
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:24:27 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:32:14 -0500
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The command line switch --enable-freeze, as well as the properties
>/sim/freeze/master an
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:32:14 -0500
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The command line switch --enable-freeze, as well as the properties
/sim/freeze/master and /sim/freeze/position don't work (at least not
with
JSBSim or Yasim). I don't know if they ever have, or if they are a
work in
pro
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:36:58 +0200
Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, nVidia graphic cards have drivers capable of twin-view in Linux.
You just have to edit your XF86Config file, to match your
configuration. Detonator README covers all questions btw.
I've used the GeForce card I have
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:15:02 -0400
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are still some problems we need to work out. For example, if
you set the wind to 0 and turn off the engine, the helicopter still
slides backwards and turns -- we'll have to figure out why there are
forces acting o
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:11:55 +0100
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you sure the differential tail deflections can't be done in JSBSim?
Well, it's not so much that it can't be done. However, there are some
factors to consider. Depending on the flight conditions and modes, the
flight
Could anyone provide a screen dump image of this aircraft flying in
FlightGear?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:55:05 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrei Barbu has revamped the flightgear web site layout and made
quite a few improvements. I have placed the proposed changes here:
http://www.flightgear.org/www.andrei/
Outstanding.
Jon
___
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:42:18 -0500
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Failed to untie property /consumables/fuel/tank[0]/level-gal_us
Failed to untie property /consumables/fuel/tank[1]/level-gal_us
Failed to untie property /engines/engine[0]/fuel-flow-gph
Failed to untie property /engines/engin
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:02:26 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did anyone change anything with property names recently? My flight
recorder is also broke now. :-(
What's the date on JSBSim.cxx? There were some changes that were made
to that file for engines, I think. If that was
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:01:59 +0100
James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- a similar elevator effect to that martin described,
when deploying the flaps at high speeds
- very odd high pitch angle behavior ... I can't really
describe it, alas. It seems like way too much lift is
getting developed
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
> Which is better:
>
> awk
> gawk
> nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild guess here: I'll bet you and Curt
didn't do to well in multip
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
??
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 16:15:48 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes.
Curt.
Is it worth a new screen shot?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 23:37:25 +0200
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Curtis is going to do a new scenery release but is unable
to get the SRTM30 data include due to time restrictions
(they should be generated within a day or two).
We might be able to get it going for him if there are
[Sorry if this ends up being a duplicate post]
MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov
Nancy Lovato (818) 354-9382
Jet Propulsio
MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov
Nancy Lovato (818) 354-9382
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
David E. Steitz
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:32:18 +0100 (BST)
Jon Stockill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
I think S-3 Viking.
C130
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0097.shtml
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:41:33 -0400
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you are flying fast enough (i.e. a dive). Any
suggestions? JSBSim
does not handle windmilling properly either.
Any suggestions?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:23:07 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but it may give us many more options for moving forward with new and
better graphic effects.
My uneducated, gut feeling, leads me to opt for the route
that gives the most promise for the future.
Jon
_
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 19:36:15 +0100 (BST)
Paul Morriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Mass Multiplayer Server (MAYS) - Instead of a single
How do you get MAYS from Mass MultiPlayer Server? Should
it not be MMS, or MMPS? This is serious. The correct
acronym is critical in getting project support!
;
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 16:03:33 -0400
"Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes this is *very* annoying :-)
Yep. I haven't quite figured out how to work this into my
batch build script. If I could figure out how to latch
into the result code when simgear checks to whether the
latest metakit is
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:14:57 -0400
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a problem with JSBSim models in general -- most of them tend to
drop a wing in the stall. The problem is that JSBSim only recently
started supporting wing washout
We did?
_
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:07:22 -0500
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..cool, then we don't need my F-16 drag shute housing
pics. ;-)
Do we have drag shutes modelled?
Yes. There exists a property called
/controls/flight/drag-chute which takes a
boolean value.
In JSBSim you could add a Kin
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:35:52 +0200
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we have drag shutes modelled?
I've thought about this extensively. There are lots of
reasons I'd like to model it. It would not be too hard,
either. It's the *time*.
Jon
___
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:36:11 +0200
Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's amazing!
Are there any F16 models planned for FlightGear in early
future? Because I have few friends from Falcon community
who could lend us their models and skins with no problem.
There already is. There is a JS
On 1 Jul 2003 17:20:40 GMT
Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm happy to see those in CVS, I yet have to verify if this breaks build on
other platforms. BTW, we have to give notice to Jon about these changes,
otherwise he'll revert them on the next JSBSim update.
Would anyone commit the fix
What's the potential of creating contrails for such a
thing as the X-15 rocket engine? Wingtip vortices? etc.?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Some of you may know that JSBSim has the ability to make
scripted runs. I would like to be able to do this for
JSBSim when integrated with FlightGear. It won't be
terribly difficult at all - I'll just need to add a few
lines inside JSBSim.cxx. If no script is specified, no
effect is made on e
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:00:22 +0200
Martin Dressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You should be able hide your aircraft in Hangar. If I
remember it. Even new hits routine has some support for this.
Madr
I think Norman may know the answer to this one. However,
JSBSim simply gets a terrain height fr
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:00:45 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
/sim/rendering/enhanced-lighting
toggle enhanced runway lighting on or off
/sim/rendering/distance-attenuation
add distance attenuation to the enhanced runway
lighting
What i
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
Frederic BOUVIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
> Just an update on the A320 model :
>
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png
>
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png
What was the flight model for
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:54:45 +0200
Pieter Pareit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Op woensdag 11 juni 2003 19:37, schreef Jon S Berndt:
What's a wiki?
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?search=wiki&go=Go
In short, a web page that can contain anything, that can
be updated by an
What's a wiki?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Gene Buckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If he flies for Aeroflot, they may not notice the
difference. *gd&r*
You guys are scaring me. ;-)
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgea
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:40:42 +0200
Jorge Van Hemelryck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It will be easy to convert the 737 model to an A320.
I'll send you one.
What about fly-by-wire ? How can it be taken into account
?
Since David is making a JSBSim version of the A-310, you
can use the JSBSim flight
On 03 Jun 2003 15:30:46 -0700
Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The roll trim was bound to the yaw trim props and vice-versa. Probably
the fault of the guy who did the properties for JSBSim, can't remember
his name offhand, though, ...
Well, we'll have to dock his pay when we find out who he
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:08:50 -0400
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's something else to worry about before the release:
a recent bug fix in JSBSim
?? Which fix ??
meant that all of the JSBSim-based
propeller planes are now badly out of trim. I fixed the default C172P,
but I need
201 - 300 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
