Karsten Krispin wrote:
If you are able to turn something, that fgfs get compiled with 2.3.2, the
chances are probably better to provide a working binary! - I also can bake my
own fgfs. But that wasn't your intention, I assume.
Exactly, I was investigating if this would be a valid platform
I just built the current CVS version of FlightGear on a LinuxPPC
machine I have access to. Unfortunately I don't have a chance to
actually run the binary and see if it works.
If I post a simple binary package, would anyone test-run FG for me ?
Am Sonntag 31 Juli 2005 00:50 schrieb Martin Spott:
I just built the current CVS version of FlightGear on a LinuxPPC
machine I have access to. Unfortunately I don't have a chance to
actually run the binary and see if it works.
If I post a simple binary package, would anyone test-run FG for me
