Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-14 Thread Julian Foad
Source Navigator (originally by Cygnus, then RedHat, but now being maintained on SourceForge) is well worth a try. Right now, the patched version at http://oimanager.de/sn.htm is best, but there should be an "official" release some time soon. It has more cross-referencing features than MSVC,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-14 Thread David Megginson
Curtis L. Olson writes: > It would be similar for someone going the other direction. A unix > developer would feel stiffled being strapped into a single app only > being able to do the things available on the menus ... and an MSVC > program is nothing more than a "document" and all the usefu

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-13 Thread Norman Vine
Curtis L. Olson writes: > >I wanted so much to stay out of this thread, but I'm a glutton for >punishment I guess . Me too but .. > dog slow "command" windows would make life miserable. "command' windows are not dog slow, AFAIK a raw Windows command shell running cmd.exe or its equivalant is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-13 Thread Curtis L. Olson
John Check writes: > On Monday 13 May 2002 7:38 pm, Christian Mayer wrote: > > > As written earlier: I didn't like EMACS as I tried it (c'mon, which sane > > person programms in LISP?). I'll rather try vi (I'm also using it on a > > few big HPUX at work). Oh, AFAIK you can replace the internal ed

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-13 Thread John Check
On Monday 13 May 2002 7:38 pm, Christian Mayer wrote: > As written earlier: I didn't like EMACS as I tried it (c'mon, which sane > person programms in LISP?). I'll rather try vi (I'm also using it on a > few big HPUX at work). Oh, AFAIK you can replace the internal editor of > KDevelop with VIM i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-13 Thread Christian Mayer
Andy Ross wrote: > > I could jump in and talk about specific tools, and all the Emacs LISP > code that does what you want, but I'll let other people do that. From > the way your question is phrased, I interpret that you are trying to > make your Linux environment work just like the development e

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-12 Thread Simon Fowler
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:47:55AM -0400, David Megginson wrote: > On the down side, Emacs takes a while to learn; on the up side, once > you've learned it, you can do anything you want extremely fast (I've > amazed customers during onsite visits by making complex changes to > large programs or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-12 Thread Andy Ross
Christian Mayer writes: > David Megginson wrote: > > Christian Mayer writes: > > > > > Oh, BTW, EMACS and VI/VIM are no option for me (vim is great to change > > > a file, but not to have a overview over a big project) > > > > What kind of an overview do you need? > > Well, all the stuf a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-12 Thread David Megginson
Christian Mayer writes: > So stuff like syntax higlighting, keyword completion, integrated > debugger, I get all of this in Emacs or XEmacs. I'm sure other programmers' editors support it as well. M-x gdb starts a debug session for FlightGear, and I get a source-level walkthrough in Emacs wh

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-11 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 14:42, Christian Mayer wrote: > Hi, > > > > as I'm now ready to run Linux frequently, I'm looking for a comfortable > IDE for the development. > > Has anyone exprience? Does KDevelop work nicely together with FGFS? Do I > need to make spacial adjustmenst (on anyside)? kd

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-11 Thread Bernie Bright
Christian Mayer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as I'm now ready to run Linux frequently, I'm looking for a comfortable > IDE for the development. > > Has anyone exprience? Does KDevelop work nicely together with FGFS? Do I > need to make spacial adjustmenst (on anyside)? > > Oh, BTW, EMACS and VI/VI

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-11 Thread Christian Mayer
David Megginson wrote: > > Christian Mayer writes: > > > Oh, BTW, EMACS and VI/VIM are no option for me (vim is great to change > > a file, but not to have a overview over a big project) > > What kind of an overview do you need? Well, all the stuf a modern IDE gives you. So stuff like synta

[Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-11 Thread Christian Mayer
Hi, as I'm now ready to run Linux frequently, I'm looking for a comfortable IDE for the development. Has anyone exprience? Does KDevelop work nicely together with FGFS? Do I need to make spacial adjustmenst (on anyside)? Oh, BTW, EMACS and VI/VIM are no option for me (vim is greqat to change

re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux IDE

2002-05-11 Thread David Megginson
Christian Mayer writes: > Oh, BTW, EMACS and VI/VIM are no option for me (vim is greqat to change > a file, but not to have a overview over a big project) What kind of an overview do you need? All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _