RE: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit?

2004-02-27 Thread Giles Robertson
This assertion also appears in the compile instructions. Giles Robertson -Original Message- From: Richard Bytheway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 February 2004 14:02 To: FlightGear developers discussions (E-mail) Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit? I noticed on the web site (http

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit?

2004-02-27 Thread Richard Bytheway
I noticed on the web site (http://www.flightgear.org/cvs/anoncvs.html) the assertion that Metakit is required: Metakit. A suitable version of MetaKit is included in the SimGear/src-libs/ subdirectory. If your distribution doesn't provide a Metakit (and Metakit-devel) package, you will have to b

RE: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-03 Thread Norman Vine
Martin Spott writes: > > "Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > cd $METAKIT/builds > > ../unix/configure --disable-shared --with-out-tcl --prefix=/usr > > make > > make install > > I configure Metakit with slightly different options: > > # ~> cd ./builds > # ~> ../unix/configure --pre

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-03 Thread Martin Spott
"Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cd $METAKIT/builds > ../unix/configure --disable-shared --with-out-tcl --prefix=/usr > make > make install I configure Metakit with slightly different options: # ~> cd ./builds # ~> ../unix/configure --prefix=${FG_ROOT} --disable-shared --enable-static

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-02 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 16:03:33 -0400 "Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes this is *very* annoying :-) Yep. I haven't quite figured out how to work this into my batch build script. If I could figure out how to latch into the result code when simgear checks to whether the latest metakit is

RE: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-02 Thread Norman Vine
Martin Spott writes: > > Chris Reichow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you're compiling using Cygwin or MinGW, like I am, > > I just copy the compiled libraries to /usr/lib. It's > > a lazy workaround. > > Yes, in case I _really_ want to use the current Metakit, then I'll do > something about

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-02 Thread Martin Spott
Chris Reichow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you're compiling using Cygwin or MinGW, like I am, > I just copy the compiled libraries to /usr/lib. It's > a lazy workaround. Yes, in case I _really_ want to use the current Metakit, then I'll do something about it. I'm just wondering if I'm the only

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-01 Thread Chris Reichow
If you're compiling using Cygwin or MinGW, like I am, I just copy the compiled libraries to /usr/lib. It's a lazy workaround. But, I believe that some people say you can add "-L/usr/local/lib" to your configure line to make it work. Good Luck. -Chris Reichow [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Martin Spott <[

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-08-01 Thread Martin Spott
"Innis Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Got Ya.Another victim of the metakit bug. > Jon I dont know if you are running under linux or windows.But if you have a > look in the FAQ's section 5.1 you will get the answer for linux [...] FAQ's 5.1 is not a bug, it's a feature :-) Current Lin

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-07-31 Thread Innis Cunningham
Got Ya.Another victim of the metakit bug. Jon I dont know if you are running under linux or windows.But if you have a look in the FAQ's section 5.1 you will get the answer for linux and if you run under windows have a look at the reply by Eric Hofman to the thread "Help Please can't find ld.so.c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-07-31 Thread Bernie Bright
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:24:55 -0500 Jon Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've downloaded the latest fgfs, plib, and simgear, and as usual I need to > install the latest metakit - which I did. However, the simgear build process > doesn't seem to know it exists. I get this when building simgear: >

[Flightgear-devel] metakit

2003-07-31 Thread Jon Berndt
I've downloaded the latest fgfs, plib, and simgear, and as usual I need to install the latest metakit - which I did. However, the simgear build process doesn't seem to know it exists. I get this when building simgear: checking for mk4.h... yes checking for metakit 2.4.3 or newer... wrong vers

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit update

2003-03-08 Thread Michael Basler
You may recall me (and other Cygwin users) having problems compiling Metakit for some time. These were the issues: (i) I had to specify --with-tcl=no (no big deal), (ii) I had to eleminate 30 lines of code from strings.cpp which would not compile (ugly). I contacted the author Jean-Claude Wippler

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit build problem...

2002-06-30 Thread Gene Buckle
Thanks Julian! It explains _why_ Norman's suggestion worked. :) g. On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Julian Foad wrote: > Gene Buckle wrote: > > > > I get the attached error when building Metakit. I'm using the latest > > Cygwin installation. > > > > g++ -c -O2 -I../unix/../include -I/usr/include/generic

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit build problem...

2002-06-30 Thread Gene Buckle
> just replace the % make command above with % make core > or edit the all: target in the Makefile > to be like this > > all: core > Thanks Norman. I didn't realize the TCL stuff wasn't needed. g. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit build problem...

2002-06-30 Thread Julian Foad
Gene Buckle wrote: > > I get the attached error when building Metakit. I'm using the latest > Cygwin installation. > > g++ -c -O2 -I../unix/../include -I/usr/include/generic -I/usr/include > ../unix/../tcl/mk4tcl.cpp -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC > In file included from ../unix/../tcl/mk4tcl.cpp:22: > ..

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit build problem...

2002-06-30 Thread Norman Vine
Gene Buckle writes: > >I get the attached error when building Metakit. I'm using the latest >Cygwin installation. >Any ideas? I just < after reading your message > tested this by untaring the metakit tarball distributed with SimGear and then followed the instructions i.e. % cd builds % .

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit build problem...

2002-06-30 Thread Gene Buckle
I get the attached error when building Metakit. I'm using the latest Cygwin installation. /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile g++ -c -O2 -I../unix/../include -I/usr/include/ generic -I/usr/include ../unix/../tcl/mk4tcl.cpp rm -f .libs/mk4tcl.lo g++ -c -O2 -I../unix/../include -I/usr/include/generi

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit 2.4.7 is out

2002-06-13 Thread Roman Grigoriev
Guys Subj is out so maybe we include it to simgear distribution? Thanx in advance Bye ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit 2.4.2 => 2.4.3

2002-03-27 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Ok, I have updated the version of metakit included with simgear to 2.4.3-33 Regards, Curt. Julian Foad writes: > The SimGear root includes metakit-2.4.2-32.tar.gz. Version 2.4.3 is now available >and fixes several potentially serious bugs. I'm not saying Flight Gear is affected >by any of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit 2.4.2 => 2.4.3

2002-03-27 Thread Julian Foad
Jon S Berndt wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:08:59 + > Julian Foad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The SimGear root includes metakit-2.4.2-32.tar.gz. > > Version 2.4.3 is now available and fixes several > >potentially serious bugs. I'm not saying Flight Gear is > >affected by any of them (

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit 2.4.2 => 2.4.3

2002-03-27 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:08:59 + Julian Foad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The SimGear root includes metakit-2.4.2-32.tar.gz. > Version 2.4.3 is now available and fixes several >potentially serious bugs. I'm not saying Flight Gear is >affected by any of them (I have no idea) but I think it's

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit 2.4.2 => 2.4.3

2002-03-27 Thread Julian Foad
The SimGear root includes metakit-2.4.2-32.tar.gz. Version 2.4.3 is now available and fixes several potentially serious bugs. I'm not saying Flight Gear is affected by any of them (I have no idea) but I think it's worth considering upgrading. FWIW, under my CygWin systems (on both Win2k and W

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-07 Thread Alex Perry
> From: Alex Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Go find the MEMCHK project and download the floppy disk image. > > Copy it to a floppy and leave it running overnight (or over weekend, etc). > > It'll tell you for-sure what the status of your memory chips and bus are. > > as long as you are _not_

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-07 Thread Martin Spott
From: Alex Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Go find the MEMCHK project and download the floppy disk image. > Copy it to a floppy and leave it running overnight (or over weekend, etc). > It'll tell you for-sure what the status of your memory chips and bus are. as long as you are _not_ SMP (or did

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
> My computer crashed totally yesterday, and I sent it to be replaced (luckily > it was still under warranty). I either think it's RAM or the slot on the > motherboard for the RAM. Go find the MEMCHK project and download the floppy disk image. Copy it to a floppy and leave it running overnight (

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Danie Heath
Sorry Guys, The problem isn't with Metakit My computer crashed totally yesterday, and I sent it to be replaced (luckily it was still under warranty). I either think it's RAM or the slot on the motherboard for the RAM. Sorry to have taken your time. Danie Heath I build using RH 7.1, among oth

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Jonathan Polley
I build using RH 7.1, among others, and had no problem building Metakit. I unpacked the archive to my home directory and did the standard make and make install. What kind of errors are you seeing? Jonathan On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 10:09 AM, Martin Dressler wrote: > I'm not RH user,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Andy Ross
Danie Heath wrote: > I'm extremely eager to start developing, but I can't because metakit > won't compile on my Linux system. This is flatly incorrect. Metakit builds just fine on your Linux system. Hey, if you don't provide any documentation for your problems, then I won't document my soluti

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Dressler
I'm not RH user, but why you don't try to install metakit from distribution's rpm. In debian it work without problem. -- Martin Dressler e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.musicabona.com/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
> Redhat 7.2 Sorry, can't help you then. I'll refer you to the RH users on the list. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-05 Thread Danie Heath
Duron 1000 MHz Redhat 7.2 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Perry Sent: 06 March 2002 09:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit > I'm extremely eager to start developing, but I can't because

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-05 Thread Alex Perry
> I'm extremely eager to start developing, but I can't because metakit won't > compile on my Linux system. Which processor, distribution ? ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-05 Thread Danie Heath
I'm extremely eager to start developing, but I can't because metakit won't compile on my Linux system.   Any suggestions     Danie Heath Web Integrator RisC Com cc +27 12 654-5100 083 412 6904 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit problem

2002-02-27 Thread Marcio Shimoda
I'm trying to compile FG using VC6 but this error occurs "Compiling... atis.cxx c:\simgear-0.0.17\simgear\metakit\include\mk4.inl(181) : error C2593: 'operator <' is ambiguous c:\simgear-0.0.17\simgear\metakit\include\mk4.inl(187) : error C2593: 'operator <' is ambiguous c:\simgear-0.0.17\simgear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-02-12 Thread Christian Mayer
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote: > > Christian Mayer writes: > > metakit still lives in the CVS tree (+ as an additional zip archive > > there). Is that OK? I thought it's supposed to be kept extra. > > Looking at the actual repository, I only see the metakit and zlib tar > balls. The unrolled subdirec

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-02-12 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Christian Mayer writes: > metakit still lives in the CVS tree (+ as an additional zip archive > there). Is that OK? I thought it's supposed to be kept extra. Looking at the actual repository, I only see the metakit and zlib tar balls. The unrolled subdirectories have been removed. What cvs arch

[Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-02-12 Thread Christian Mayer
Hi, metakit still lives in the CVS tree (+ as an additional zip archive there). Is that OK? I thought it's supposed to be kept extra. CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible.-- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... __