Hello,
Oliver Correll schrieb:
2. To repaint the parts I took from the package
There I have one questions:
When I go to the aircarft museum and take some cockpit photos.
Can I use them for panel painting (like the 737 panel) ??
You will need permission from the museum or ai
> 2. To repaint the parts I took from the package
> There I have one questions:
>
> When I go to the aircarft museum and take some cockpit photos.
> CanI use them for panel painting (like the 737 panel) ??
You will need permission from the museum or aircraft owner to use th
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:09:53 +0200, Georg wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hans-Georg Wunder schrieb:
>
> > ...
> > - Do we have a place to store aircrafts with uncompliant aircrafts
> > ???
>
>
> Hi Hans-Georg,
> there is an AVSIM category in the file library named "FlightGear" with
>
>
> Is someone out there who has a 707 panel photo me ; ??
> (There is no aircraft museum in Germany with a 707, AFAIK)
>
The Hamburg airport has a 707 as a museum sitting on the ramp
http://www.airport.de/de/boeing_707.html
I just wrote a mail to the contact address on that page
Hans-Georg Wunder schrieb:
...
- Do we have a place to store aircrafts with uncompliant aircrafts ???
Hi Hans-Georg,
there is an AVSIM category in the file library named "FlightGear" with 4
sub-categories:
- base distribution, - source code, -scenery and terrain and
miscellaneous files.
You
Hans-Georg Wunder wrote:
> Now there three ways to go to get the panel GPL compliant:
There still seems to be a misunderstanding. The issue here is not a
minor technicality regarging open source license compatibility. It is
that this package got caught using artwork to which the author does
not
Andy Ross wrote:
Hans-Georg Wunder wrote:
In the package there is a GPL-license.
If this is enough, then everything is OK regarding the panel.
Unfortunately, due to clear evidence of (minor, admittedly) copyright
violation, this is not enough. The issue isn't license compatibility,
it is co
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:06:40 -0400, Jim wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > From: Andy Ross
> >
> > Hans-Georg Wunder wrote:
> > > In the package there is a GPL-license.
> > > If this is enough, then everything is OK regarding the panel.
> >
> > Unfortunately, due to clear evidence of (mi
> From: Andy Ross
>
> Hans-Georg Wunder wrote:
> > In the package there is a GPL-license.
> > If this is enough, then everything is OK regarding the panel.
>
> Unfortunately, due to clear evidence of (minor, admittedly) copyright
> violation, this is not enough. The issue isn't license compatibi
Hans-Georg Wunder wrote:
> In the package there is a GPL-license.
> If this is enough, then everything is OK regarding the panel.
Unfortunately, due to clear evidence of (minor, admittedly) copyright
violation, this is not enough. The issue isn't license compatibility,
it is copyright ownership.
Thank you for the tips
I understand your concerns. I took the panel from
the package b707-436v2.zip from John Carty.
In the package there is a GPL-license.
If this is enough, then everything is OK regarding the panel.
I wrote John a mail and told him, what Iam going to do,
but I got no answer.
If
Karsten Krispin wrote:
> roy.vegard.ovesen wrote:
> > Those icons at the top, just right of the menu bar. I'm pretty sure
> > that they come from MSFS, and thus are probably under a license
> > uncompatible with GPL. I suggest that Hans-Georg simply remove them,
> > there probably are no such butto
12 matches
Mail list logo
