[Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Paul Surgeon
What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx? Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state? At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere. Regards Paul ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Paul Surgeon a écrit : What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx? Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state? At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere. As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the load-aircraft command. So I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Paul Surgeon a écrit : What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx? Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state? At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere. As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Paul Surgeon
On Sunday, 19 December 2004 19:24, Frederic Bouvier wrote: As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the load-aircraft command. So I guess that it is intended to be called from an xml file, presumably a menu or a dialog. Thanks, I missed that part. I'll give it a whirl and see what

[Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft build failure

2003-03-29 Thread James Turner
cvs up -dP as of 30 minutes ago, Making all in Aircraft make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jmt/FGFS/FlightGear/src/Aircraft' source='aircraft.cxx' object='aircraft.o' libtool=no \ depfile='.deps/aircraft.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/aircraft.TPo' \ depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../depcomp \ g++

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft build failure

2003-03-29 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 05:57 pm, James Turner wrote: I don't get why aircraft.cxx defines fgLoadAircraft as a static inline, since both of these seem wrong; it's a large function to inline (and not called frequently, I assume), and it's been declared in a public header file. Silly