Re: [Flightgear-devel] MK VIII EGPWS emulation

2006-03-04 Thread Jean-Yves Lefort
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:09:40 +0100 Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Curtis L. Olson a écrit : > > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > > >> I am trying to integrate this contribution in the code base but after > >> too much hours spent on this, I finally won't. Three reasons : > >> > >> - it d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MK VIII EGPWS emulation

2006-03-04 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Curtis L. Olson wrote : I've seen everything from "I didn't know what that section of code did so I deleted it", to "this patch is mostly broke, but I expect you'll seek out, debug, and fix all the problems", all the way up to huge massive patches that touch darn near

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP related segfaults

2006-03-04 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Please tell my if there is still something wrong. Greetings Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun

2006-03-04 Thread Justin Smithies
Hi Frederic, I have checked my paths and rebuilt a fresh copy from the cvs but still no aircraft or airports. I have pasted my build output in case you can spot something. Sorry for the long email guys . Updating fgrun Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvsroot/f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun

2006-03-04 Thread Frederic Bouvier
syd & sandy wrote : > Hi guys not sure if anyone here can help , but since my last cvs update last > week i am unable to see any aircraft or airports in FGRUN. > The other options work fine , but there is nothing in the aircraft chooser > window or airports. > I update fgrun from cvs too and rebu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MK VIII EGPWS emulation

2006-03-04 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Curtis L. Olson wrote : > I've seen everything from "I didn't know what that section of code did > so I deleted it", to "this patch is mostly broke, but I expect you'll > seek out, debug, and fix all the problems", all the way up to huge > massive patches that touch darn near every file in the proj

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP related segfaults

2006-03-04 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Saturday 04 March 2006 11:50, AJ MacLeod wrote: > It's very possible that the other segfaults I was seeing were related to or > a consequence of the problem you've just produced a fix for - I'd like us > to test that fix and see what we find, rather than possibly wasting > anyone's time tracking

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP related segfaults

2006-03-04 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Saturday 04 March 2006 10:30, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > I have sent a small point fix to simgears properties to Curt. That one will > fix what you reported below. Excellent! That is by far the most commonly ocurring problem with MP at the moment and it will be nice to see it gone. > But what

[Flightgear-devel] 737-300 diy cockpit

2006-03-04 Thread Justin Smithies
Propert tree issues i'm having which didnt used to happen before. Whilst looking at the property tree /engines/engine and /engines/engine[0] I have noticed that if i change values like running to false they revert straight back to true. The same with things like the cutoff i'm sure this used to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP related segfaults

2006-03-04 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
AJ, On Friday 03 March 2006 00:18, AJ MacLeod wrote: > OK, we had a nice number on the MP server tonight and have a few more MP > bugs... I have sent a small point fix to simgears properties to Curt. That one will fix what you reported below. But what additional bugs did you find? Greetings

RE: [Flightgear-devel] A4F Model

2006-03-04 Thread Vivian Meazza
In YASim, The launch bar or strop and the holdback can be attached to any part of the aircraft, including the nose-wheel leg. So a nose-wheel tow can be simulated if that is appropriate for the aircraft type. IIRC the first such aircraft was the F14 Tomcat, and all subsequent USN carrier ai

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MK VIII EGPWS emulation

2006-03-04 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Curtis L. Olson a écrit : > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > >> I am trying to integrate this contribution in the code base but after >> too much hours spent on this, I finally won't. Three reasons : >> >> - it doesn't compiles under MSVC, for obscure reason I don't understand. >> - there are a lot of fil

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear on LinuxTag;

2006-03-04 Thread Jon Stockill
Martin Spott wrote: To my experience power stations are most useful when you fly over the clouds and don't want to bother with radio navigation. Simply follow the cloud-'towers' that break through the 'regular' cloud layers and you're done :-) OK, so we need to add cloud to the cooling towers