Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG-OSG the wall on sea ?

2007-09-06 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gh.robin wrote: > > > Hello, > > Some time ago we had a lot of problem offshore with FG OSG ,(missing tile, > wrong resolution) > > Now we have the wall. > This is the result of my code to add more detail and curvature to the ocean tiles. Your

[Flightgear-devel] Start-Up error.

2007-09-06 Thread Bohnert Paul
All, >From time to time I get the following error when starting FlightGear. fgfs --multiplay=in,10,10.0.0.12,5000 --multiplay=out,10,mpserver04.flightgear.org,5000 --timeofday=noon --callsign=pab FATAL: PUI: No Live Interface! Forgot to call puInit ? My OS is Fedora 6. My FlightGear is CVS

Re: [Flightgear-devel] groundcache, solid, water, why not a property ?

2007-09-06 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> > As far as "other gear features", what would those be? > > - not allowing to land/taxi on water (except water planes) > - gear friction taken from the ground material > - considering ground bumpiness (small on concrete, high in the forest) > > You can check how Maik JUSTUS implemented it for Y

[Flightgear-devel] FG-OSG the wall on sea ?

2007-09-06 Thread gh.robin
Hello, Some time ago we had a lot of problem offshore with FG OSG ,(missing tile, wrong resolution) Now we have the wall. Here the snapshot http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/tsunami.jpg And the position where i have found it http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/tsunami-pos.jpg Cheers -- Gérard ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] groundcache, solid, water, why not a property ?

2007-09-06 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Jon S. Berndt -- 9/6/2007 1:15 PM: > It's always been a question of how to get that information to > the gear model. But, just so I am clear on one thing, the terrain material > is a property of a polygon, correct? There is no granularity smaller than > that? No more granularity, but that wouldn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML question for upgrading the ATC "aircraft"

2007-09-06 Thread Csaba Halász
On 9/6/07, Ron Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - How can I fix the 2D-Panel even when looking around with the mouse? > > Good question... Anyone? It is already fixed. Note that my atc patches are not yet in cvs. To make matters worse, I have moved and my old ISP has deleted my website. I'

Re: [Flightgear-devel] groundcache, solid, water, why not a property ?

2007-09-06 Thread gh.robin
On jeu 6 septembre 2007, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > > Melchior FRANZ > > > > But that's IMHO the only way that makes sense. And JSBSim > > (unlike YASim) currently lacks other gear features, anyway. > > Per-gear-material-info can easily be implemented when the > > JSBSim gear gets friction/solidity/etc

Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML question for upgrading the ATC "aircraft"

2007-09-06 Thread Holger Wirtz
Ron, On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:33:18PM +, Ron Jensen wrote: [...] > You can either have multiple nav sections: > > false > > > false > > > Or set the nav to 1 directly: > > false > Ahhh, ok I see...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML question for upgrading the ATC "aircraft"

2007-09-06 Thread Ron Jensen
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:44 +0200, Holger Wirtz wrote: > Hi, > > I will expand the ATC "aircraft" with one (or two) COMs. because I had > never done this before I have some problems and questions for the > experts: > > - I want to set the properties for /instrumentation/nav[1]/serviceable > to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] groundcache, solid, water, why not a property ?

2007-09-06 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> Melchior FRANZ > > But that's IMHO the only way that makes sense. And JSBSim > (unlike YASim) currently lacks other gear features, anyway. > Per-gear-material-info can easily be implemented when the > JSBSim gear gets friction/solidity/etc. awareness. The > "the whole world is a runway" behavior

[Flightgear-devel] XML question for upgrading the ATC "aircraft"

2007-09-06 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, I will expand the ATC "aircraft" with one (or two) COMs. because I had never done this before I have some problems and questions for the experts: - I want to set the properties for /instrumentation/nav[1]/serviceable to false. If I write some XML code like the following in Aircraft/ATC/MP

Re: [Flightgear-devel] groundcache, solid, water, why not a property ?

2007-09-06 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gh.robin -- 9/6/2007 12:05 AM: > We can with an external property "scenery material type" to process > correctly the aircraft reactions according to the type. And which material should this report? The one under the left wing tip, or the one 150 m behind the tail, or what?! FlightGear has n