Curtis,
Finally getting somewhere on this issue. Using the Seahawk with Apr source
and data, performance is very satisfactory. Generally good frame rates, with
just the odd stagger, which judging by the odd video I have seen on YouTube,
seems to be the general case. Using cvs-head source and
On 23 Sep 2008, at 21:08, Melchior Franz wrote:
Modified Files:
glide_slope_tunnel.nas
Log Message:
- remove no longer neede complement_runways() function
- s/threshold1/threshold/
Thanks Melchior - I forget to do some searches in data/ when I updated
this interface.
James
On 24 Sep 2008, at 09:38, James Turner wrote:
Thanks Melchior - I forget to do some searches in data/ when I updated
this interface.
Also, just noticed this (in char-menu.xml) :
# Determine the active runway. We have two ways to do this:
# - If the aircraft is on the ground (or
* James Turner -- Wednesday 24 September 2008:
This could either be an addition member on the airport hash
yes
[...] a new function exposed to Nasal makes sense [...]
IMHO no
active_runway_for_airport(apt_id, ... other optional args )
The airportinfo() function is there to
On mercredi 24 septembre 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Curtis,
Finally getting somewhere on this issue. Using the Seahawk with Apr source
and data, performance is very satisfactory. Generally good frame rates,
with just the odd stagger, which judging by the odd video I have seen on
YouTube,
Hello everyone ,
I 've been pondering an idea of adding updraft/downdrafts to the
environment, probably as a part of turbulence , so it can be
enabled/disabled...
My idea is to calculate wind-speed-from -down , by checking wind speed ,
direction , and the normal of the
scenery triangle
Hi,
Hello everyone ,
I 've been pondering an idea of adding
updraft/downdrafts to the
environment, probably as a part of turbulence , so it can
be
enabled/disabled...
My idea is to calculate wind-speed-from -down , by checking
wind speed ,
direction , and the normal of the
scenery
In my experience the active runway is designated by the ground radio
station at the field. At small fields it is the same active runway for
take-off and landing. At large busy fields these might be two
different (often parallel) runways. If different non-parallel runways
are designated, they
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Hello everyone ,
I 've been pondering an idea of adding
updraft/downdrafts to the
environment, probably as a part of turbulence , so it can
be
enabled/disabled...
My idea is to calculate wind-speed-from -down , by checking
wind speed ,
direction , and
Hello all,
As part of a project at school, I have been trying to come up with equations
of motion for an aerial platform, so that I may use the equations to design a
control system. The issue is that I'm having trouble coupling linear and
angular dynamics. Specifically, I need to describe
Have you taken a look at the Formulation section in the JSBSim Reference
Manual? That might help. See the Documentation link at the top of
www.jsbsim.org.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Ampere K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:07 PM
To: FlightGear
From: gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree, don't do that +1
PS. In case anyone wonders why I've only been lurking for a year or so:
FGFS stopped building on my develop machine and I've not resolved the issue yet.
It seemed like a bad idea to say too much on the list when I'm unable to run
Thanks for the reply. I've just looked through that section, and it seem that
omega x v
(eq. 1.5-13)
is a recurring theme in dynamics modelling. After doing unit analysis, I
found that it gives acceleration. So I guess I will try making use of it in
my own equations of motion.
Another
13 matches
Mail list logo
