* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 05 November 2008:
> * Curtis Olson -- 11/3/2008 4:46 PM:
> > - If it was me doing this, I would suggest something like:
> > Airports/L/LO/LOX/LOXA.xml (just the one file per airport)
>
> As I wrote previously, if we drop the requirement to have
> separated files per a
* Curtis Olson -- 11/3/2008 4:46 PM:
> - If it was me doing this, I would suggest something like:
> Airports/L/LO/LOX/LOXA.xml (just the one file per airport)
As I wrote previously, if we drop the requirement to have
separated files per airport, then I'd go with Curt's layout.
Of course, this make
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:19 +0100, Durk Talsma wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008 21:26:18 Syd wrote:
> Hi Syd,
>
> > Ok my turn :)
> > I found Ron's comment about not being welcome to create scenery a bit
> > disturbing ... why?
>
> Just to make a slightly off thread comment: All I can say is
Thanks guys , I think I understand the purpose now. I was referring to
adding airport building at CYVR , I haven't tried actually modifying the
terrain or airport layout .
Cheers
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Mobl
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 21:26:18 Syd wrote:
Hi Syd,
> Ok my turn :)
> I found Ron's comment about not being welcome to create scenery a bit
> disturbing ... why?
Just to make a slightly off thread comment: All I can say is that Ron's
comments on this list have been courteous and professional
Ok my turn :)
I found Ron's comment about not being welcome to create scenery a bit
disturbing ... why?
So I'll ask a dumb , non developer question: What exactly is the purpose
of this directory setup ?
Will it affect my own attempt to update local scenery ?Is it meant to
make scenery additions
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:21:30 +0100, Melchior wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, because the need to have many files per airport was actually your
> only argument. I based my final suggestion on that "requirement". But,
> ok, let's go with the on-file-per-airport approach. I actually fin
On mardi 04 novembre 2008, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:27 +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Ron Jensen -- 11/4/2008 1:15 PM:
> > > I'll shut up now since I've already been told I'm not a "real"
> > > FlightGear developer and I'm not welcome to create scenery.
> >
> > I hope that w
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:27 +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Ron Jensen -- 11/4/2008 1:15 PM:
> > I'll shut up now since I've already been told I'm not a "real"
> > FlightGear developer and I'm not welcome to create scenery.
>
> I hope that wasn't me. I don't label people "real" or "non-real"
> s
* Ron Jensen -- 11/4/2008 1:15 PM:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:01 +0100, Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> > I have already provided the arguments in favour of the three-level
> > hierarchy.
Yes, we were really only arguing over whether a fourth level would
be too expensive, and whether organizing files via pr
Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> Ron Jensen wrote:
>> Managing this in CVS would
>> add another 9,681 CVS directories and 29,000 (Entries, Repository and
>> Root) files.
>
> No management in CVS is planned.
At least not in this structure. This is a means of data transport, not
of data management.
Cheers,
Ron Jensen wrote:
> Managing this in CVS would
> add another 9,681 CVS directories and 29,000 (Entries, Repository and
> Root) files.
No management in CVS is planned.
Cheers,
Ralf
--
Ralf Gerlich | World Custom Scenery Project
Computer Scientist| http://www.custom-scenery.o
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:01 +0100, Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> Curtis Olson wrote:
> > Is there a reason that we split up each airport's data into at least 5
> > different files?
>
> There is reason to separate the pure airport geometry data from the
> AI-network. Those come from different sources and a
Hi,
* Ralf Gerlich -- 11/3/2008 5:29 PM:
> why do you take this to the -users list again, where it is obviously
> off-topic as a development issue and after I had taken the discussion
> where it belongs: to the -devel list?
Sorry, that was an accident. I had intended to stop posting to this
fruit
Hi Curt!
The World Custom Scenery Team has decided - already some time ago - that
the scenery release intended for shipping with the planned FlightGear
release in December will be the _last_ scenery release produced by the
World Custom Scenery Team that is synchronized with the Base Package
apt.da
* Alex Perry -- 11/3/2008 11:26 PM:
> Off topic to Melchior and Ralf's non-technical discussion, but:
Better "non-technical" than technical but wrong. ;-)
> To truly optimize for load balancing the operating system's directory
> searches,
This isn't about load balancing at all. It's just abo
Off topic to Melchior and Ralf's non-technical discussion, but:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Ralf Gerlich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The index concept has some similarity to a B-tree
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-Tree) in terms of structure, though the
> balancing aspect and therefore som
Hi Melchior,
why do you take this to the -users list again, where it is obviously
off-topic as a development issue and after I had taken the discussion
where it belongs: to the -devel list?
The proposal as posted in my announcement was designed by a group of
developers, not just Martin and me. I
18 matches
Mail list logo
