Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-28 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Durk wrote: > In the mean time, here is the changelog. A couple of comments on reading this again. > rendering bugs). The switch to OpenSceneGraph marks an important milestone > for FlightGear, as it allows us to make full use of the advanced rendering > options already available in OpenSceneGr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
On Dec 28, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Csaba Halász wrote: > > FYI, the black rectangle also occurs on linux, especially with older > nvidia cards only supported by the legacy driver (no possibility to > upgrade). The bug appeared with the change to 2 cameras. Tim said he > might have some workaround for thi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Csaba Halász
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > James Turner wrote: > >> I'm noticing quite a few people on the forums with difficulty running >> 1.9.0 - either long delays on startup, hangs while loading scenery, >> crashes or rendering issues. Some of these are certainly driver >> iss

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Ron Jensen
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 09:58 +, James Turner wrote: > On 27 Dec 2008, at 09:39, Durk Talsma wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 December 2008 10:11:46 Stuart Buchanan wrote: > >> I think it's something we need to bear in mind for the next > >> release. We'll > >> need to put more effort to get extern

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread fredfgfs01
from the website. Now, if GC manufacturers find an interest in supporting FG, they could forward some of their products to a panel of developers ! -Fred -- message original -- Sujet: Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback De: Durk Talsma Date: 27.12.2008 09:42 Hi, On Saturd

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Martin Spott
Durk Talsma wrote: > It seems to me that the release procedure isn't finished yet. I haven't seen > an announcement on flightgear-announce, and the gallery is still pointing to > the 1.0.0 one. IIRC, Curt used to sent the announce mails, but I could be > wrong here. If so, I'll do that later.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread James Turner
On 27 Dec 2008, at 09:39, Durk Talsma wrote: > On Saturday 27 December 2008 10:11:46 Stuart Buchanan wrote: >> I think it's something we need to bear in mind for the next >> release. We'll >> need to put more effort to get external testing of RCs on Windows/ >> ATI. > > Yes, I agree, but the p

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi, On Saturday 27 December 2008 10:11:46 Stuart Buchanan wrote: > I think it's something we need to bear in mind for the next release. We'll > need to put more effort to get external testing of RCs on Windows/ATI. Yes, I agree, but the problem is how to do that. For this release, we've had two

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Stuart Buchanan
James Turner wrote: > I'm noticing quite a few people on the forums with difficulty running > 1.9.0 - either long delays on startup, hangs while loading scenery, > crashes or rendering issues. Some of these are certainly driver > issues, especially with ATI and the dreaded Intel chipsets. An

[Flightgear-devel] 1.9.0 feedback

2008-12-26 Thread James Turner
I'm noticing quite a few people on the forums with difficulty running 1.9.0 - either long delays on startup, hangs while loading scenery, crashes or rendering issues. Some of these are certainly driver issues, especially with ATI and the dreaded Intel chipsets. And of course people who're h