LOL :-)
Maybe flight gear should make coffee...
Don't airliners all have galley coffee makers?
Obviously it is as important to realism as a crash indicator which
doesn't use physics to be triggered and ignores the in flight desires of
its users who may not WANT entertainment water crashes or
GW--
Sure, coffeemakers are a good idea. But what about the cement trucks and
bulldozers used to build an airport: should those be included just in
case someone wants to build an airport in their backyard? Perhaps we can
get a large group of people to post links to photos of those backyards
GWMobile schreef:
The original post quoted below exemplifies why I beleive it is a mistake
to ever have crash detection for water in a flight sim however let me
lay it out simply.
1. Anyone who lands on water in a flight sim knows they are doing it. It
is highly likely they WANT to do it
I have to say that no person will use flightgear for reenacting actual
crashes because it doesn't model structures.
In crash recreation they don't ever model impact but only 1. Structural
debris spread after impact or 2. flight system or weather conditions
prior to impact or 3. structal
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:20:24 -0500, GWMobile wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have to say that no person will use flightgear for reenacting actual
crashes because it doesn't model structures.
..seeing the sponsorship in action, I'd caution you, remember what
happened when someone else
5 matches
Mail list logo
