On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:27:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm pretty experienced with Car modelling for simulation software
but not yet with planes. Any tips?
..guys, do we have ground handling fixed now? It used to be a bit
weird.
--
..med vennlig hilsen
Hy I'm new here so be patient with me :)
I have a few questions. I looked at the Aircraft to-do list in the wiki and
noticed for example that from the Beech99 the nose was not correctly modeled.
I've looked at the Beech 99 and saw that the current status was unknown so I
thought and give it a try.
On 29/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now the questions is it oke if I solve some of the outstanding issues with
plane
textures and 3d models?
Yes, please. If the plane has a current maintainer, send your changes
to him or her if possible (if you don't hear back in a
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few questions. I looked at the Aircraft to-do list in the wiki and
noticed for example that from the Beech99 the nose was not correctly
modeled. I've looked at the Beech 99 and saw that the current status was
unknown so I
From: info
Are the planes with status unknown no longer updated by their original
authors?
Not really. The status is pretty meaningless as there is no agreed upon
standard for what it defines. I think most of mine say unknown. In my
opinion Status should be removed from the web page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hy I'm new here so be patient with me :)
I have a few questions. I looked at the Aircraft to-do list in the wiki and
noticed for example that from the Beech99 the nose was not correctly modeled.
Not only the nose. The whole Beech99 is now far behind most of the FG
6 matches
Mail list logo
