leee a écrit :
[...]
If individuals want to spend their time bounty-hunting (although
there's no ca$h bounty, of course) then they're welcome to do so, but
this should not be a concern of the FG project. The only time that
this issue should concern the FG project is when someone tries
Hi all,
I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight
Gear community wants to go ?
As far as I understand the GPL, it is legal to rename an application
as long as the renamed application is still under GPL. So what is this
commit intended for ? Furthermore, do you honestly
Bertrand Coconnier wrote:
Hi all,
I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight
Gear community wants to go ?
As far as I understand the GPL, it is legal to rename an application
as long as the renamed application is still under GPL. So what is this
commit intended
Bertrand Coconnier wrote:
I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight
Gear community wants to go ?
These people at Flight Pro Sim are deliberately trying to decieve the
FlightGear devlopment 'crew' (just think of their ridiculous attempt of
calming the waves by offering
I'm flabbergasted : disregarding the GPL to protect the GPL ?
How novel..
Really, really misguided, and it showcases a prevalent undercurrent with
some of our members, who think the GPL means something else than it really
does : when something is done that doesn't sit right with their vision of
Erh, he just has to take out said code, and his customers will not be the
wiser, since they won't see the message.
He does read the list after all.
As Bertrand said, it's not going to achieve the desired result, not at all.
And it's trying to work around the GPL, by doing something different if
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:32:17 -0400, Nicolas wrote in message
808354800910240732j3a31c2belb37bbcc2a50c8...@mail.gmail.com:
Erh, he just has to take out said code, and his customers will not be
the wiser, since they won't see the message.
He does read the list after all.
As Bertrand said,
On Saturday 24 Oct 2009, Nicolas Quijano wrote:
[snip...]
Really, really misguided, and it showcases a prevalent
undercurrent with some of our members, who think the GPL means
something else than it really does
[...]
I think this really sums up the issue here.
The GPL isn't there to protect
8 matches
Mail list logo