Curtis Olson wrote:
No one wants to remove existing content from the FlightGear project, even
though some of that same content would not be allowed to be submitted by
some authors as it stand right now. Because it was submitted by other
authors or was submitted in the past we are ok with it.
Jack:
I don't have commit power, but I strongly recommend you include text along with
the model which says Red Bull does not endorse your model or FlightGear. I'd
also write why you think it's okay to use the trademark in this instance, which
is to accurately reflect a real-life livery of a
On Feb 26, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Gary Neely wrote:
There's a saying in English about bearding the lion in his den. It's
probably better to stay beneath the lion's radar.
Especially considering the rather top-heavy population of fuzzy bunnies we
have
From: Curtis Olson
Hi Jon,
I apologize for being persnickety here, but I am searching
for clarity and consistency on this issue.
Has the JSBSim project asked permission from all the
aircraft manufacturers that you create and
Just a thought , but maybe asking nicely rather than demands and
threats might work better ;)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning on contacting Red Bull today. If I get the green light, I
better see my livery in the database lickity split!
I'm no lawyer, and I'm certainly not up on the law around the world, but
there's a concept in North American common law that one must take
reasonable and prudent steps to avoid liability. With this concept in
mind, I respectfully ask whether it is reasonable and prudent to
explicitly take the
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:50:25 +0100, Oliver wrote in message
20110218125025.291...@gmx.net:
Stuart wrote:
snip
I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about
asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer.
Very good points mentioned. Especially the point
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
If in doubt – in fact, even if not in doubt – it’s good to ask.
Here’s an actual data point.
snip
I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about
asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer.
We could send out
From: Stuart Buchanan [mailto:*.*.*]
I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about
asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer.
...
Jon - could you post the disclaimer text you eventually used?
-Stuart
With JSBSim, our situation is a little different,
Stuart wrote:
snip
I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about
asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer.
Very good points mentioned. Especially the point that this will increase FGs
appearance on some radars.
However lots of people are nowadays using
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about
asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer.
We could send out a series of emails to all the trademark holders we
can identify, starting with the airlines as the most
: [Flightgear-devel] Logos and licensing
Chris’ point is well-taken.
If in doubt – in fact, even if not in doubt – it’s good to ask.
Here’s an actual data point.
There was an “event’ a few years ago that lead me to inquire with Boeing about
the use of their company name in identifying certain
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
