Stuart wrote: > <snip> > > I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about > asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer.
Very good points mentioned. Especially the point that this will increase FGs appearance on some radars. However lots of people are nowadays using Google so the debate has become public anyway. I would to point out that besides the two results "yes" and "no" there might be a third one worth considering which is: "No answer from the TM holder". This might be treated the same as "yes" or "no". In case of treating it as "yes" we should agree how to treat potential consequences ;) Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
