Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-30 Thread Adrian Musceac
> Thinking of most GA and business aviation aircraft I know the NAV > antenna (VOR/LOC/GS) is always located on the vertical tail, just below > the horizontal tail with a cross or t-tail and on top of the vert. tail > with a low hor. tail. These are usually two antennas, one on each side > of the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-30 Thread Eric van den Berg
>> Another big influence is the antenna pattern of the antenna on the >> aircraft. Fuselage, wing and empennage are the blocking structures of >> course. If you want I can have a look and get you some "typical" data >> for "structure blocked signal loss". >> >> A lot of aircraft have a seperate GS

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Adrian Musceac
On Monday, November 28, 2011 20:20:03 Eric van den Berg wrote: > > That I do not know. But I do know there are long-range and short-range > VOR-s with significantly different output levels. Not sure how to > determine the difference easily. > For NDB-s it is more easy. The short range ones are on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Adrian Musceac
> > The nav.dat file contains 'range' in nm for the nav-aid. > http://data.x-plane.com/file_specs/Nav740.htm > > Perhaps you could use some heuristic to create a reasonable power level to > meet the published range? > > Ron > Oh I see then, my bad, I was not aware of this fact. Of course, the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Ron Jensen
On Monday 28 November 2011 11:20:03 Eric van den Berg wrote: > On 11/28/2011 06:14 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote: > > On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote: > >> For GA (what I have handy right now): > >> The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm > >> Avidyne

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Eric van den Berg
On 11/28/2011 06:14 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote: > On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote: > >> For GA (what I have handy right now): >> The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm >> Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV >> >> www.repeater-builde

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Adrian Musceac
On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote: > For GA (what I have handy right now): > The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm > Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV > > www.repeater-builder.com/measuring-*sensitivity*/*dbm*2uv.pdf > /for conversi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Eric van den Berg
For GA (what I have handy right now): The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV www.repeater-builder.com/measuring-*sensitivity*/*dbm*2uv.pdf /for conversion table!/ The Avidyne is TSO minimums if I remember correctly. Their uni

[Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-24 Thread Adrian Musceac
Hi there, I'm about to start implementing navradio signal propagation, and I'd like to know from anyone who has experience with this type of radios whether this spec sheet performance is typical for most receivers including airline big iron, so that I should hardcode or not the values. https:/