Hi Alisdair,
>> Doesn't work ... --with-simgear=RELATIVE_PATH ...
>> Is this normal?
Do not (yet) know or understand enough about 'automake' to know if it is
'normal' to fail with a relative path...
But when you think about it '../simgear-cs' would NOT be correct when
compiling in say the 'src'
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 18:35 +0100, Geoff McLane wrote:
> Hi Alasdair,
>
> I just noted the comment in your terra_compile.sh script -
> # ??why does configure not pick up the correct includes if I specify
> --with-simgear=$BUILDDIR/simgear-cs
>
> As advised in my post yesterday (Feb 12), the confi
Geoff McLane wrote:
> And have now more or less answered my own question - Q: difference
> between cvs and git simgear? - A: LOTS ;=))
I'm glad you managed to get there ;-)
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Hi Alasdair,
I just noted the comment in your terra_compile.sh script -
# ??why does configure not pick up the correct includes if I specify
--with-simgear=$BUILDDIR/simgear-cs
As advised in my post yesterday (Feb 12), the configure.ac is clobbering
the EXTRA_DIRS created by the --with-simgear=PA
The issue with git clone terragear-cs but ok with simgear-cs still exists on
this debian machine but the suse machine is fine.
Strange but it seems is must be this machine as other folks seem ok as is
mys suse 10..3 machine.
Otherwise the script seems ok here.
The problem now is the Terragear-cs
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:43:51 +0100, Csaba wrote in message
:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> >> on this frequency, I would be grateful if someone with a few
> >> minutes to spare could check out my script.
> >
> > ..url?
>
> Attached In his previous mail.
..me, I p
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
>> on this frequency, I would be grateful if someone with a few minutes
>> to spare could check out my script.
>
> ..url?
Attached In his previous mail.
--
Csaba/Jester
--
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:33:58 +, Alasdair wrote in message
<1234373638.2955.14.ca...@dominatrix.riverview>:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 00:09 +0800, Harry Campigli wrote:
> > Hmm
> >
> > It turns out changing the Debian git version made no difference,
> > worked of GS but not TG. But I found a
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 19:40 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote:
> Oh it will abort by itself - who has sudo? :)
> Using git clone instead of git-clone should be more portable.
> Adding some || (echo "something failed"; exit) is also useful,
> especially after configure.
> I don't have OSG and PLIB installe
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Alasdair Campbell
wrote:
>
> If there is anyone listening on this
> frequency, I would be grateful if someone with a few minutes to spare
> could check out my script. Just abort when it comes to your password on
> "sudo make install"
Oh it will abort by itself - w
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Alasdair Campbell
wrote:
>
> If there is anyone listening on this
> frequency, I would be grateful if someone with a few minutes to spare
> could check out my script. Just abort when it comes to your password on
> "sudo make install"
Oh it will abort by itself - w
Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> I find it hard to understand why you can git-clone simgear-cs but not
> terragear-cs from the same location. Equally hard to understand why this
> should be distribution dependant.
I agree. We had a little hiccup with the GIT service today - probably a
simple re-try co
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 00:09 +0800, Harry Campigli wrote:
> Hmm
>
> It turns out changing the Debian git version made no difference,
> worked of GS but not TG. But I found a git rpm to suit the SUSE 10.3
> machine that worked.
>
> Its been compiling away for a while. see whats there in the morni
Hmm
It turns out changing the Debian git version made no difference, worked of
GS but not TG. But I found a git rpm to suit the SUSE 10.3 machine that
worked.
Its been compiling away for a while. see whats there in the morning.
Thanks again Alasdair.
reg Harry
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:40
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 18:05 +0800, Harry Campigli wrote:
>
> Ok thanks for that Alasdair,
>
> Is there some thing a miss with the Terragear archive today, The git
> clone command from the script works ok on the Simgear-cs but not
> Terragear-cs.
>
> I could be wrong but I cant see it being loca
Ok thanks for that Alasdair,
Is there some thing a miss with the Terragear archive today, The git clone
command from the script works ok on the Simgear-cs but not Terragear-cs.
I could be wrong but I cant see it being local here if one works and the
other does not. Is it just me?
git clone http
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 23:23 +0800, Harry Campigli wrote:
>
> Are you running Terragear on your Debian machine?
>
Hiya Harry, I've been running Debian Sid (unstable) for several years
now, and I find it great fun, especially without a hard hat. Every day,
first thing, I run Synaptic and get all m
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:04 PM, LeeE wrote:
>
> However, trying to keep up with FG cvs did become too
> problematic for me in the end and I will most likely just stick to
> the rather old version that gets released with Lenny for the
> immediate future. It's not an ideal solution but because FG
Hello Harry,
I've never tried installing terragear on any of my systems so I've
no idea if it's easy to do or what problems you'll have to work
around. However, trying to keep up with FG cvs did become too
problematic for me in the end and I will most likely just stick to
the rather old versi
Martin Spott wrote:
> Harry Campigli wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>
>>> The machine we're using for the World Scenery builds runs OpenSUSE 10.2
>>> - just by 'accident', as the OS was already installed by the time when
>>> we were given access to it. As far as I
Martin Spott wrote:
> Harry Campigli wrote:
>
>> So till now for Terragear the only confirmed starter mentioned is Slackware
>> 11.0,12.0 and 12.1
>
> The machine we're using for the World Scenery builds runs OpenSUSE 10.2
> - just by 'accident', as the OS was already installed by the time when
Harry Campigli wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>> The machine we're using for the World Scenery builds runs OpenSUSE 10.2
>> - just by 'accident', as the OS was already installed by the time when
>> we were given access to it. As far as I remember quite a lot of tes
Thanks Martin,
That sits very nicely with my existing SUSE 10.3 set up then.
Herry
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Harry Campigli wrote:
>
> > So till now for Terragear the only confirmed starter mentioned is
> Slackware
> > 11.0,12.0 and 12.1
>
> The machine we're usi
Thanks for the reply Lee,
Your comments all noted, especially with respect to stability, as opposed to
bleeding edge.
Thats fine with me as I have always been behind a release with Suse from 6
to 10 running machines as routers and servers over the last 10 years. Those
machines only ever rebooted
Harry Campigli wrote:
> So till now for Terragear the only confirmed starter mentioned is Slackware
> 11.0,12.0 and 12.1
The machine we're using for the World Scenery builds runs OpenSUSE 10.2
- just by 'accident', as the OS was already installed by the time when
we were given access to it. As f
Many thanks Melchior,Gerard,Martin and Jon,
Please don't forget I am looking for the Terragear OS option that most
developers are using.
For the FG building side of things I see no reason to change the 4 FG sim
machines away from SUSE 10.3 in the foreseeable future, Also after so many
years with
Hello Harry,
I've been a long-time user of Debian, in fact, it's the only
distribution I've really used, so while I'm not qualified to
comment on other distros I think I've learned some of the pros &
cons of using Debian.
I would say that Debian's greatest plus feature is the stability and
co
Harry Campigli wrote:
>
>
> I have used SUSE for years, currently using 10.3. but feel it has "gone
> off" since version 9. However I have always managed to build FG from
> source on it with a bit off mucking around but never Terragear.
>
> For along time I have wondered about Debian. I get th
* Harry Campigli -- Tuesday 10 February 2009:
> These days it seems you need to buy a commercial version
> for the full house.
I can't confirm that. Maybe you mix up Novell/SuSE and OpenSuSE?
> With 10.1 I did a bit of mucking about and got FG built ok,
> Same with 10.3.
I've always had to do
Hi Melchior,
No its not political, and I am just looking for the best option for the
future.
I moved over to SUSE 6 early 90's from Redhat because Yast was really good
and everything worked from the cds. Also the CDs were complete. These days
it seems you need to buy a commercial version for the
On mardi 10 février 2009, Harry Campigli wrote:
> I have used SUSE for years, currently using 10.3. but feel it has "gone
> off" since version 9. However I have always managed to build FG from source
> on it with a bit off mucking around but never Terragear.
>
> For along time I have wondered about
Hi Harry,
I understand your motivation to research people's preferences about
Linux distributions. Nevertheless, as the topic always carries a
certain 'religious' touch, you'll certainly face difficult times
telling which of the responses you might get is really to be taken
serious ;-)
In general
* Harry Campigli -- Tuesday 10 February 2009:
> I have used SUSE for years, currently using 10.3. but feel it
> has "gone off" since version 9.
Can you be more specific? Or is this just "political feeling"?
> Everything from the install worked of the mark. Unlike SUSE.
What was the problem? I
I have used SUSE for years, currently using 10.3. but feel it has "gone off"
since version 9. However I have always managed to build FG from source on it
with a bit off mucking around but never Terragear.
For along time I have wondered about Debian. I get the impression a lot of
FG developers use
34 matches
Mail list logo
