Rest assured, the Concorde has its share of oddities :)
See the known problems part in the ReadmeConcorde-jbsim.txt.
Yes, it sure does. But I guess I mean something slightly different.
I have tried to fly AP-controlled IFR approaches in a number of planes
(since I can do really good-looking
Am 06.07.2011 08:56, schrieb thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi:
I keep asking in the forum if anyone knows a plane that reliably
intercepts glideslope when under AP control - so far no one has been able
to come up with one. If someone here knows a plane, please let me know and
I give it a try.
I spent
I spent several hours in RL flights measuring the behaviour and timing
of the CENTURYIII and several days to implement the measured values in
it's digital counterpart in the SenecaII.
I am confident that the SenecaII has an autopilot capable handling all
published procedures including flying
Sorry, I should have been more clear. My original comment was about
airliners and that's what I was still referring to. I fly the SenecaII
quite frequently and have indeed never had any problems with its AP.
Ah - ok. I obviously missed you were mentioning airliners. Glad, that
it's working for
We currently have
- 777-200
I have been trying the CRJ700 lately, and I think this might be an option
for an airliner as well - the cockpit has a nice visual quality, it comes
with engine start procedure, the AP seems to be well-tuned and free of
oscillatory behaviour and the night lights in
If the scope is to show off the capabilities, I'd really consider the IAR-80
too.
Alessandro
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:50:57 +0300
From: thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft selection for 2.4.0
We currently have
On Monday, July 04, 2011 13:16:33 TDO_Brandano - wrote:
If the scope is to show off the capabilities, I'd really consider the
IAR-80 too.
Alessandro
I agree, the Mig-15b and IAR-80 are really well done and the ASK13 is the best
glider imo.
Adrian
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:50 AM, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
The AP has some trouble following a VOR radial or intercepting a
glideslope, but then I don't really know any airliner (with the exception
of the Concorde) which doesn't have any oddity in the AP.
Rest assured, the Concorde has
Hi Torsten et al.,
As mentioned by others, I do believe that this is quite a nice selection. But,
I think that we should consider our original intentions for rotating the
aircraft selection. By changing the selection, we have a nice platform to
showcase some of the recent development and
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 19:53 +0200, Durk Talsma wrote:
Let's start our traditional discussion about what aircraft should be in the
base package of the next release (2.4.0).
We currently have
CRJ700-family?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Torsten
Let's start our traditional discussion about what aircraft should be in
the
base package of the next release (2.4.0).
We currently have
- 777-200
- A6M2
- b1900d
- bo105
- c172p
- CitationX
- Dragonfly
- dhc2
- f-14b
- Cub
- SenecaII
- sopwithCamel
- ufo
- ZLT-NT
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Should we change this setup?
I'm in favour of leaving the selection as-is - simply for the practical
purpose of saving us from the usual flame war :-)
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
12 matches
Mail list logo
