Am 13.03.12 17:46, schrieb Martin Spott:
>
> According to my personal experience it simply doesn't get any work done
> to have yet another communication channel (just look at the Scenery web
> forum - you know what I mean ;-) but it adds more overhead because
> there's one more channel to monitor
flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
> BTW. I=92m wondering why no one uses the new flightgear-scenery mailing list
> for such discussion? Does it need more promotion?
According to my personal experience it simply doesn't get any work done
to have yet another communication channel (just look at the Sce
> Considering the same legal issues arise frequently, would you mind posting
> a link to the discussion, because all I can find is this:
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Copyright_Inquiry
>
> And in a quick response to the second question, your scenery would be more
> detailed if you built it
Considering the same legal issues arise frequently, would you mind posting a
link to the discussion, because all I can find is this:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Copyright_Inquiry
And in a quick response to the second question, your scenery would be more
detailed if you built it using S
Am 12.03.2012 18:25, schrieb andrea...@gmx.net:
> Hi, I'm the one who asked about the legal situation of using elevation
> data from a topographic map.
>
> http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=15711&p=152972&sid=0383829e2324ecb1bc0c0ed67655e826#p152945
>
> I checked with the institu
Hi, I'm the one who asked about the legal situation of using elevation data
from a topographic map.
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=15711&p=152972&sid=0383829e2324ecb1bc0c0ed67655e826#p152945
I checked with the institution that provides these maps and they said
they're _no
rgen
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 3:17 PM
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Willfully violating Google Terms of Use
>
> They actually tried to sue anyone who published photographs of the
> Atomium, either on their personal blog or on album accounts. Pro
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Steenbergen
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 3:17 PM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Willfully violating Google Terms of Use
They actually tried to sue anyone who published photographs of the
Atomium, either on
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Willfully violating Google Terms of Use
>
> Op 12-3-2012 15:26, Martin Spott schreef:
> > That's an interesting case and we probably had a similar one recently
> > in Germany. Did they try to sue anyone who *published* these
> &g
Op 12-3-2012 15:26, Martin Spott schreef:
> That's an interesting case and we probably had a similar one recently
> in Germany. Did they try to sue anyone who *published* these
> photographs (on their private Picasa/Flickr/Panoramio or other albums)
> or just those who *sold* photographs ? Cheer
Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
> Op 12-3-2012 14:33, Martin Spott schreef:
>> I'd like to emphasize that willfully violating the terms of use of a
>> map should always be considered as being illegal and therefore
>> unwelcomed (particularly in FlightGear land), no matter wether the
>> map-maker can
Op 12-3-2012 14:33, Martin Spott schreef:
> Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
>
>> In case of a building or airport modeled off a map, how is the original
>> map-maker going to recognize that the runway (12000ft long) was actually
>> derived from *his* map?
> I'd like to emphasize that willfully violati
Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
> In case of a building or airport modeled off a map, how is the original
> map-maker going to recognize that the runway (12000ft long) was actually
> derived from *his* map?
I'd like to emphasize that willfully violating the terms of use of a
map should always be c
There is a big difference between republishing a printed work and using
it for a derivative, such as deducting measurements from a (paper) map
to make a computer model of the streets or buildings which are also
represented on the map.
First off, in the case of a direct republish, the map's publ
Martin Spott wrote:
> Stefan Seifert wrote:
>> For example at least in Germany and Austria but problably most of Europe,
>> these "Terms of Use" printed on the map are no more legally binding than an
>> "End User License Agreement" which many programs display on first start.
>> That
>> is beca
Stefan Seifert wrote:
> For example at least in Germany and Austria but problably most of Europe,
> these "Terms of Use" printed on the map are no more legally binding than an
> "End User License Agreement" which many programs display on first start. That
> is because in these jurisdictions, on
On Monday 12 March 2012 11:17:05 Martin Spott wrote:
> No, not by "looking" at a map, but by "buying" a printed map - which is
> what I stated above. Since you hardly get your hands onto commercial,
> printed maps (which I believe is the item we're talking about) without
> the act of buying the m
Johannes,
Johannes Ebke wrote:
> On 12.03.2012 09:38, Martin Spott wrote:
>> The issue in question, neither with Google imagery nor with most
>> printed maps, is _not_ about "Copyright". Instead, by buying a printed
>> map or by using Google Earth, you're signing a contract over how you're
>> al
Dear Martin,
I disagree that you "sign a contract" when looking at printed maps. You
cannot establish a contract by stating: "by looking at this map, you
agree to X Y and Z".
However, at least in Germany where the original question came from,
there are separate laws protecting Geodata from reuse,
"Alan Teeder" wrote:
> From: Martin Spott
> >
> > http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=15711&p=152972&sid=0383829e2324ecb1bc0c0ed67655e826#p152945
> The original question did refer to paper maps.
Indeed, so why doesn't this jerk just develop a sensible on-topic reply
instead of
-Original Message-
From: Martin Spott
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 7:00 AM Newsgroups: list.flightgear-devel
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Willfully violating Google Terms of Use underthe
FlightGear umbrella ?
http://www.flightgear.org/forums
21 matches
Mail list logo
