Possibly this is just me, but: I find adding pilot models to the aircraft a bit weird - could it be made optional (a submodel)? I can't quite explain why, it just seems disconcerting to me. Of course there is an argument for having models for each crew member and passenger, to accurately reflect lo
Hi Julien ,
the Bravo , (and the rest of my aircraft) are works in progress
it may be a long time before every aspect is finished (if ever) ... but
I should be able to send an update in a few days with the flightdirector
/ autopilot partially functional (heading & altitude).
These things
No problem, I understand completly, i just pointed it out.
And thanks for your nice work, i really enjoy the Bravo.
Julien
Just saw the respective announcement on Freshmeat:
http://kfreeflight.sourceforge.net/
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
On 24/03/06, James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Possibly this is just me, but: I find adding pilot models to the aircraft a
> bit weird - could it be made optional (a submodel)? I can't quite explain
> why, it just seems disconcerting to me. Of course there is an argument for
> having model
David Megginson wrote:
> On 24/03/06, James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Possibly this is just me, but: I find adding pilot models to the aircraft a
>>bit weird - could it be made optional (a submodel)? I can't quite explain
>>why, it just seems disconcerting to me. Of course there is
Josh Babcock wrote:
>
> I think it would be a good thing if aircraft designers started including
> select animations tied to /sim/model/pilot-visible-internal and
> /sim/model/pilot-visible-external with the appropriate conditions so
> that they each work in the appropriate views
> (/sim/current-
--- Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tested a few aircraft with fgsetup-0.9.10-pre2.exe
> now uploading to
> ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de ( should be ready in about
> 40 mn )
While on the subject of glitches, looks like there's a
problem with code for Fokker50. I couldn't find where
Mike Rawlins wrote:
While on the subject of glitches, looks like there's a
problem with code for Fokker50. I couldn't find where
the string "fokker50E" is being set. I'm assuming the
proper designation should be simply "fokker50" per
file in Models/.
This has been fixed some time ago.
Eri
--- Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Rawlins wrote:
>
> > While on the subject of glitches, looks like
> there's a
> > problem with code for Fokker50. I couldn't find
> where
> > the string "fokker50E" is being set. I'm assuming
> the
> > proper designation should be simply "fokk
Hello,
I browsed the property tree but I didn't find any switch that allows me
to toggle the units for the altimeter reference pressure in the b1900d.
Currently EDDW has a QNH of 1001 hPa and I would like to set the
altimeter in the b1900d accordingly.
Any chance ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ u
Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 16:25 schrieb Martin Spott:
> Hello,
> I browsed the property tree but I didn't find any switch that allows me
> to toggle the units for the altimeter reference pressure in the b1900d.
> Currently EDDW has a QNH of 1001 hPa and I would like to set the
> altimeter in the b1
Hi Thomas,
Thomas F??rster wrote:
> You're flying without conversion tables on your knees, brave pilot... ;-)
>
> Try the 'metar' tool, it gives both hPa and Inch mercury, i.e. $> metar eddw
I know I could convert into in. Hg and set the altimeter accordingly,
this is what I actually do if requ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 23 March 2006 16:18:
> It's just a question of time, though, until the same bug in
> JSBSim bites us in the ass in the same way. Please fix. (see attachment)
Anything wrong with the patch? Nobody from JSBSim interested?
Should I commit?
m.
--
Just so you guys know the 707 is on the download page for the next FG release but do not work with the current JSBSim, old config.Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: "David Megginson"
>
> flies them), but when I do use external views, I find it very
> disconcerting if nobody's flying the plane, especially the small ones
> like the Cub.
I like it: http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/p51pilot.jpg
Best,
Jim
--
Jim Wilson
Kel
The other day I was browsing through AI flight plans trying to get my
head around how they are setup.
I want to setup a scenario where I have a lead plane that I am trying to
follow. It will climb/decend and/or turn left/right. Usually the lead
and chase planes will want to maintain some fix
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 23 March 2006 16:18:
> > It's just a question of time, though, until the same bug in
> > JSBSim bites us in the ass in the same way. Please fix. (see attachment)
>
> Anything wrong with the patch? Nobody from JSBSim interested?
> Should I commit?
>
> m.
Go ahead. Hav
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> Go ahead. Have you tested it? With several aircraft of different types? I'll
> eventually add it in to JSBSim CVS, but have visitors this weekend.
>
> Jon
What, they can't help?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xP
Hello,
I browsed the property tree but I didn't find any switch that allows me
to toggle the units for the altimeter reference pressure in the b1900d.
Currently EDDW has a QNH of 1001 hPa and I would like to set the
altimeter in the b1900d accordingly.
Any chance ?
Martin.
Hi Martin , so
> > Go ahead. Have you tested it? With several aircraft of
> different types? I'll
> > eventually add it in to JSBSim CVS, but have visitors this weekend.
> >
> > Jon
>
> What, they can't help?
Heh!!
J
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
I had not flown for real since the prop disc discussion. This afternoon
3:30 pm to about 5:00 pm, I was out shooting practice instrument
approaches with one of my partners in N7764P. When I was saftety pilot,
I paid attention to when I could see the prop disc and when I could not
see it. Fly
On Thu, March 23, 2006 11:55 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
> Naw, just fly backwards.
Or get some red and white paint and repaint the needle.
;-)
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scr
[converting SGPropertyNode* to SGPropertyNode_ptr]
* Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 25 March 2006 00:27:
> Go ahead. Have you tested it? With several aircraft of different types? I'll
> eventually add it in to JSBSim CVS, but have visitors this weekend.
Testing several aircraft wouldn't make much sens
24 matches
Mail list logo
