Hi,
Jon Stockill schrieb:
Lee Elliott wrote:
There have been rumours that the OS introduced deliberate errors in
their maps so that they could be used to identify 'copiers' but quite
apart from the fact that this would prove nothing (because it doesn't
preclude someone else doing exactly the
Hi again,
Ralf Gerlich schrieb:
Jon Stockill schrieb:
Think again:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Copyright_Easter_Eggs
That's the interesting part of that German rouling: The court explicitly
considered the fact that the plaintiff included such easter eggs in its
maps and
...
Or put differently: Even though the plaintiff was able to prove the
origin of the defendant's map by the easter eggs, that bought them
nothing, as the base data is not copyright protected and the easter eggs
won't count as mental creation to make it protected.
Again: IANAL, and this is
Ron Jensen
http://www.jentronics.com/fgfs/
Here is another update to the F4E, same place as it always is
http://www.jentronics.com/fgfs/F4E.tgz
Today's update has some cosmetic fixes to the 3D model, it now rotates
around its axises correctly. (Thanks Dave) It also has afterburner
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:09:55 -0400
Rob Oates wrote:
Hmm, I haven't noticed any problems with hgtchop as of yet...at least no
messages while converting the srtm's to *.arr.gz. file format.
I compiled my version of terragear using
Simgear 0.3.9 and Terragear CVS
however, I still havve a
From: Ampere K. Hardraade
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 00:38, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I am interested in getting a few more high quality screen shots for the
v0.9.10 release.
Thanks,
Curt.
Who needs screenshots where there are movies?! :P
Hi,
Chris Metzler schrieb:
hgtchop didn't freak out for me; it was more of a subtle clue that
there were problems that manifested themselves later at the end of
the chain. When you run hgtchop on the data and produce the *.arr.gz
files, hgtchop prints status info on each tile to the screen.
Hello,
I pretty much have FlightGear 0.9.10 ported to Solaris
yet seem to have noticed two things:
1. FIONBIO is not defined.
2. Issues with src/Scenery/tilemgr.hxx (tilemgr.cpp)
and the defined scope of 'queue' which affects
'fgfs_init.o' compilation. This eventually affects the
compile of
* ken mays -- Thursday 13 April 2006 15:30:
1. FIONBIO is not defined.
2. Issues with src/Scenery/tilemgr.hxx (tilemgr.cpp)
and the defined scope of 'queue' which affects
'fgfs_init.o' compilation.
So, where are the compiler/linker error messages? scope of queue
doesn't really tell me
Can we *please* finally fix the notorious crashes in tower.cxx?
This is hunting us since *several* *years*, and it's really
getting ridiculous and annoying.
Is it intentional that aircraft entries (TowerPlaneRec) for one
and the same aircraft are at the same time in two or three of
the lists?
I
Hi,
I have finally had the time to try to start messing around with
flightgear source code, and I thought it would be neat to be able to
look at the different multiplayer aircrafts when playing online. Since
it doesn't seem to support looking at any other aircrafts than your own,
I have
Hi, I'm attaching two small fixes for the b1900d:
- Unbreak night lighting of the GPWS buttons
- Fix the author tag (spelling, and remove the line break
since the property browser does not like it)
PS: Syd: now the instruments lighting stays on even when I switch off
Frank Olaf Sem-Jacobsen wrote:
s as a stowaway passenger ;)
Btw, is there any nasal documentation available somewhere?
www.plausible.org/nasal
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends
From: Frank Olaf Sem-Jacobsen
I have finally had the time to try to start messing around with
flightgear source code, and I thought it would be neat to be able to
look at the different multiplayer aircrafts when playing online. Since
it doesn't seem to support looking at any other
Steve Hosgood writes:
My only comment is just that 1937 maps will certainly be before the
National Grid was adopted, and will be based on the old triangulation
done between the late 1700's to mid 1800's. I don't know the details,
but it wasn't metric (possibly surveyed in survey chains
15 matches
Mail list logo
