HB-GRAL wrote:
> First font is ’well known’ Rockwell bold italic. Second one is Imago.
> Anyhow Rockwell has a straight and timeless type design and is avaiable
> on most systems I think?
Unfortunately both font types don't seem to be license free. To be safe
I've changed the splash screens now
Erik Hofman schrieb:
> Unfortunately both font types don't seem to be license free. To be safe
> I've changed the splash screens now to only use license free fonts (as
> shipped with The Gimp): BGP Elite Bold (with custom shear) and Dustismo
> Bold Italic.
>
> Erik
Erik,
Only for my understan
HB-GRAL wrote:
> Only for my understanding: Why does this fonts have to be licence free?
> We do not ship the fonts with the splash screen do we? Am I not allowed
> to do a pixel-design in Gimp for a GPL software with my (licenced) fonts?
Unless I'm mistaken even using an unlicensed font might c
Erik Hofman wrote:
> HB-GRAL wrote:
>> Only for my understanding: Why does this fonts have to be licence free?
>> We do not ship the fonts with the splash screen do we? Am I not allowed
>> to do a pixel-design in Gimp for a GPL software with my (licenced) fonts?
>
> Unless I'm mistaken even usi
On 22/02/10 00:20, Martin Spott wrote:
> But Yves _does_ have the license to use the font. As long as he doesn't
> distribute the font itself but only the 'printed' output, I don't see
> where we're supposed to get into trouble.
That all depends on the font license. Commercial font licenses can a
>>> That all depends on the font license. Commercial font licenses
can and
do dictate how the font can be used.
Best to use free (libre) fonts where possible to avoid the problem
totally I expect...<<<
Surely, what is being presented is an image. There is no need for
whoever sees the image
Vic Marriott wrote:
> >>> That all depends on the font license. Commercial font licenses
> can and
> do dictate how the font can be used.
>
> Best to use free (libre) fonts where possible to avoid the problem
> totally I expect...<<<
>
> Surely, what is being presented is an image. There is n
Hi,
I noticed that FG's particles contrails never reflect the coloured light
of the sun. At sunset time, they should have the same redish color as
the clouds, instead they looks like black smoke or enlightened white smoke.
a) This above is with this setting:
false
true
b) With:
false
John Denker wrote:
> I recently discovered that it is possible to fly the C172p
> (and presumably lots of other aircraft) using --fdm=ufo.
>
> This has the potential to be very useful, for instance if
> you want to pose the aircraft for pictures, and for navaid
> "flight check" missions.
>
> Thi
James Sleeman schrieb:
>
> Best to use free (libre) fonts where possible to avoid the problem
> totally I expect...
This is a good proposal. Lets check the libre fonts for really good
quality fonts and great design. Not just for Microsoft, Adobe or
Bitstream "clones" or "edits" (like i.e. Verd
The UDP remote joystick protocol FlightGear supports already requires
six four byte axis values, but it was making use of only four of them.
This patch changes the code to make all six available.
In my case I have a six channel remote control transmitter for a
helicopter and more than four is requ
Here are three bugfixes for the UDP based remote joystick server and
client. Is int32_t the correct type for a 32 bit
integer value in FlightGear? I see it is used in other places in the
code, but not that many, so I wasn't sure.
--
js_server.cxx is using long which becomes 64 bits on 64 bit
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> John Denker wrote:
> > I recently discovered that it is possible to fly the C172p
> > (and presumably lots of other aircraft) using --fdm=ufo.
> >
> > This has the potential to be very useful, for instance if
> > you want to pose the aircraft for pictures, and for navaid
I checked the libre fonts and this are my (quick) results for now:
Allerta (modified):
http://www.sablonier.ch/flightgear/splash/typosplash03.jpg
DejaVu (modified):
http://www.sablonier.ch/flightgear/splash/typosplash04.jpg
Both are well designed open fonts and have the right license for FG I
t
Hello Andreas,
>A list of the compromised models:
>negative Drag
>707
>737-300
> >> So each aircraft at a minimum
> needs a flight test and possibly some tuning for the fix.
> Sure! And of course I wasn't complaining - I thank you
> all very much for your work!
> If there is something I
15 matches
Mail list logo