On Fri, 21 May 2010, Peter Morgan wrote:
a restart is also required after a DNS change of a server, or a new one etc.
Is there a way to reset an mpserver remotely?
eg reloading config every hour or remote telnet command ?
No and yes. :)
There is no way built into fgms (and adding one would
Hi All,
My patch to hide other MP aircraft opens the door to providing a
useful function to allow multiple different communities of flyers to
use the global FG
airspace independantly, without requiring additional sets of MP servers.
The main use-case is a group of pilots wishing to practise
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
The obvious downside of this is that it may fragment the user-base.
However, if by default everyone is able to see everyone else, I think
that risk can be
minimized.
Thoughts?
Hi,
Sounds like a pretty good idea.
One technical comment: Given the
Peter Morgan wrote:
Its is/was bit of a dark how to get commit permission to FG and
its seems to be one Curt in control.
Can someone explain to process to submitting patches to this new git
scenario, or are we to be held in the grey area of hopefulnes as well ?
eg I'd like to submit a
Csaba Halász wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
My proposal is that users may optionally set a class or community they
are flying in (say /sim/multiplay/class) that is exposed over MP.
For example:
Default - the default
Newbie - for new flyers
Student - those
If we get to for example 50 mpservers, then there's gonna be a lot of admin
involved for every change
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Anders Gidenstam
anders-...@gidenstam.orgwrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Peter Morgan wrote:
a restart is also required after a DNS change of a server, or a
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Reagan Thomas thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Morgan wrote:
Its is/was bit of a dark how to get commit permission to FG and
its seems to be one Curt in control.
Can someone explain to process to submitting patches to this new git
scenario, or are we to
Peter Morgan wrote:
2) two patches have already been submitted to this list and NONE have been
appliced
As far as my memory serves (I might be wrong and I'm currently not in a
position to check) someone's been posting plausible objections against
at least one patch for the B787 which (the
Martin Spott wrote:
As far as my memory serves (I might be wrong and I'm currently not in a
position to check) someone's been posting plausible objections against
at least one patch for the B787 which (the objections) had never been
adressed.
Yup, here's the respective posting:
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Alexander Barrett wrote:
Excellent idea and one I think many will appreciate. I haven't had time to
look at it yet so please excuse the question if its obvious from within the
code:
Does this reset with every MP session, or is it easy to clear the list
either
10 matches
Mail list logo
