Hi
Don't know if it'll be of any further use to you but my contribution to an
aircraft I *love*
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-14.htm
found it while looking for resources on;
Bell UH-1 series Iroquois, better known as the Huey
Cheers
:-D ene
From: flying.toaster [EMAIL
Selon Torsten Dreyer :
Hi,
I made a thumbnail image for the aircraft download page for my ogel aircraft.
It is here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/thumbnail.jpg
Anybody out there who commits this to cvs?
It is committed. Now Curt have to regenerate the download page.
-Fred
--
Frédéric
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2006-05-02_01:19:02 (curt)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/AIModel/AIThermal.cxx
Dave Culp:
I've got some updates for the soaring scenario that will make for a more
realistic (and fun) experience. They are:
1) A cap cloud, which
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2006-05-04_05:58:59 (fredb)
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/screen/RenderTexture.h
Mac fix
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
On Sat, 6 May 2006 22:19:42 +1000, Pigeon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just noticed there's a small issue, for German locale, IceWM -
Start - Terminal, it doesn't work, but the normal xterm from Start -
Programs works. Knoppix/Morphix somehow sets locale to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
From: Melchior FRANZ
FYI: these fgcommands have been removed:
AddWayPoint
PopWayPoint
ClearRoute
old-ap-add-waypoint-dialog
old-ap-pop-waypoint-dialog
old-ap-clear-route-dialog
Why? Does the old code have to be removed?
Best,
Jim
--
Jim Wilson
Kelco Industries
PO
* Jim Wilson -- Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:15:
From: Melchior FRANZ
FYI: these fgcommands have been removed:
[...]
Why? Does the old code have to be removed?
old-ap-add-waypoint-dialog
old-ap-pop-waypoint-dialog
old-ap-clear-route-dialog
These commands were marked deprecated
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:39:
Was it common practice to use the commands via telnet?
No. AddWayPoint wouldn't even work, because props.cxx has no
idea how to handle the target argument. No problem with the
new code, *of course*. One more point ... :-}
m.
From: Melchior FRANZ
But these points wouldn't explain why the old commands would have had to go.
I made clear at several occasions (twice in the thread, once in the cvs log)
that I would be willing to add the three commands (not the depreciated ones)
again if people think they should
On Monday 08 May 2006 15:22, Justin Smithies wrote:
snip
How do i get around that without changing the controls.nas script as other
aircraft might need the 3 equal steps .
I just want mine to have 7 steps we ll in fact if i may go a little further
could i have the following positions ?
* Justin Smithies -- Monday 08 May 2006 21:22:
On my aircraft model i need the flaps to step through 7 positions.
But i noticed that the nasal script controls.nas is hard coded to 3 equal
positions only.
Not true. That's only the fallback mechanism.
How do i get around that without
From: Melchior FRANZ
Was it common practice to use the commands via telnet? (which
can, of course, still be done, but it's a little more verbose:
set /autopilot/route-manager/input [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. See other
mails in the thread.)
Hmmm...it doesn't seem like it is common practice
* Jim Wilson -- Tuesday 09 May 2006 17:01:
The second most neglected item (after documentation) in the OSS world is
backwards compatibility.
The first item is true, although access to the source code makes it
much less painful than badly documented closed source software. And
bad documentation
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Selon Torsten Dreyer :
Hi,
I made a thumbnail image for the aircraft download page for my ogel aircraft.
It is here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/thumbnail.jpg
Anybody out there who commits this to cvs?
It is committed. Now Curt have to regenerate the
Some time back, andy wrote:
Hi
I posted earlier today a msg on the user list about issues with running
fgfs on FC5 (c enclosed copy) . After a little more research I found the
development list thread about FC5 and the freeglut 2.4.
So I tried the following rpm
I've just been reworking the FDM of my Colditz Escape Glider to get it
to work with 0.9.10 and the new JSBSim .xml format.
So far so good, but
1) How do I get the 'autopilot' menu item to grey out and go away
please? I've tried studying the c172p and conclude that it does it by
* Norman Vine -- Tuesday 09 May 2006 17:37:
(this is not aimed at anyone) [...] one shouldn't forget
that someone else wrote that code most likely for the same reason one
wants to change it. i.e it fit their 'vision' :-)
Sure. That's why you need to stay around and defend your code, or it
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
It should start propogating now. Sorry for the delay. I've had zero
spare time to devote to FG in the last couple weeks due to my job
situation. Hopefully this will begin to return to normal by the end
of May.
Curt.
Thanks, Curt.
* Steve Hosgood -- Tuesday 09 May 2006 17:46:
1) How do I get the 'autopilot' menu item to grey out and go away
please? I've tried studying the c172p and conclude that it does it by
specifying its own autopilot which automagically greys out the default
one. I don't want one at all. How to
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:46 am, Steve Hosgood wrote:
I've just been reworking the FDM of my Colditz Escape Glider to get it
to work with 0.9.10 and the new JSBSim .xml format.
2) If I dive the colditz glider vertically down it manages to hold this
vertical flight until it hits the ground.
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 03:24, Simon Trusler wrote:
Hi All,
snip
I was unsure whether I could actually make a difference but it appears that
I have been able to add functionality to the 737 autopilot that was
documented as needing to be done.
Great! That's one of the areas that needed some
-Original Message-
From: Melchior FRANZ
* Norman Vine -- Tuesday 09 May 2006 17:37:
(this is not aimed at anyone) [...] one shouldn't forget
that someone else wrote that code most likely for the same reason one
wants to change it. i.e it fit their 'vision'
Sure. That's
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 06:29, flying.toaster wrote:
[snip...]
In many respects the F-14 design is very similar to that of
the SU-27 family of aircraft.
True enough, for instance landing gear design (downlocks are
located on the engine nacelle), poded engines, twin tails,
blah, blah. But
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-010.png
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-007.png
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-011.png
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-005.png
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-012.png
Two new screenshots:
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/A300-night1.jpg
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/A300-night2.jpg
Special thanks to Julien for making these two shots possible.
Ampere
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
On Mon, 8 May 2006 18:53:03 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-010.png
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-007.png
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/fgfs-screen-011.png
Looks like an Airbus A300B (missing winglets and ailerons), but then I miss
some details to be affirmative (I seem to remember there are boundary layer
fences somewhere on the leading edge and engines slung under those pylons ;o) ).
Hope I can finish my A340-500 anytime soon to join ;o)
Great
27 matches
Mail list logo
