Hi Gonzalo,
I've managed to get Mathias' suggestion of using get_elevation_m but with
strange AGL values.
I used calc_gc_lon_lat from simgear/math/polar3d.hxx for getting the
latitude/longitude from
x-meters away, then feeding the resulting lat/lon values into
get_elevation_m, but it seems th
Dustin Hilderley wrote:
> I think i may have accidentally become a part of a discussion list that
> is overflowing my in box
>
> please help me to be free of this inconvenience
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ___
Tony Pelton wrote:
> is there a list i can join, or someone i can ask, such that i could
> get e-mail from the CVS server when someone commits to the codebase ?
FlightGear-CVSLogs
http://www.flightgear.org/mail.html
Josh
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
hi all,
i'm new around here.
is there a list i can join, or someone i can ask, such that i could
get e-mail from the CVS server when someone commits to the codebase ?
i'm slowly trying to get up to speed on the codebase, and seeing what
things people are working on, by seeing what code they are
On Saturday 10 June 2006 20:34, Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> BTW: We still have some issues regarding the FlightGear graphics engine
> to solve if we want curved taxiways and generalised markings (stopbars,
> etc.), don't we?
Yes, TerrorGear won't do anything with the new data. Who's up for some hairy
3
Hi,
Tony Pelton schrieb:
> heck, even taking the records, and stuffing those records, as they are
> now, into XML would be a start.
>
> at least then, you could find records in the XML easier, and only have
> to worry about field level parsing of the data.
>
> that would be a step ...
I wouldn'
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:40:23 -0500
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
>
> That's the big argument that Ben Supnik gave me. He converted a single
> airport to an xml represenation and it was about 2Mb just for the one
> airport. Of course he used the most verbose xml variant he could
> devise, but it is tr
Tony Pelton wrote:
> well, if austin "wrote it", besides being amused by the thought, you'd
> have to question his sanity, given the code base of parsers already
> available in the wild.
I'm sure that XML would also end up with a few new features, like
"extend DTD while in flight" and "each eleme
On 6/10/06, Curtis L. Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ralf Gerlich wrote:
>
> That's the big argument that Ben Supnik gave me. He converted a single
> airport to an xml represenation and it was about 2Mb just for the one
> airport.
well, i'm sure you are well aware of this Curt, but it needs t
Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> Writing a parser is always work we rather wouldn't be doing as we'd
> rather devote ourselves to working with the data than to reading or
> writing it from or to file.
>
> What makes XML easier to parse is the presence of generic parser
> libraries that physically parse the
On 6/10/06, Ralf Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Writing a parser is always work we rather wouldn't be doing as we'd
> rather devote ourselves to working with the data than to reading or
> writing it from or to file.
yes. using XML, any number of parsers are available, AND they can do
well
Hi,
Tony Pelton schrieb:
> On 6/10/06, dene maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I know from my experience with FGTools, FGFS and TaxiDraw that parsing the
>>APT file is not trivial ...the downside is of course the need for a
>>SpecialAPT.DAT to cater for this and the inherent support and maint
On 6/10/06, dene maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know from my experience with FGTools, FGFS and TaxiDraw that parsing the
> APT file is not trivial ...the downside is of course the need for a
> SpecialAPT.DAT to cater for this and the inherent support and maintenance
> needed.
it's intere
Dustin Hilderley wrote:
> I think i may have accidentally become a part of a discussion list that
> is overflowing my in box
>
> please help me to be free of this inconvenience
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
I think i may have accidentally become a part of a discussion list that is overflowing my in box
please help me to be free of this inconvenience
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Saturday 10 June 2006 15:30:
>> Josh Babcock wrote:
>>> Too bad render to texture isn't working.
>
>> It isn't? If you got working 3d clouds then render-to-texture is
>> supported.
>
> Or look into src/Instrumentation/od_gauge.[ch]xx and .../wxradar.[ch]
* Erik Hofman -- Saturday 10 June 2006 15:30:
> Josh Babcock wrote:
> > Too bad render to texture isn't working.
> It isn't? If you got working 3d clouds then render-to-texture is
> supported.
Or look into src/Instrumentation/od_gauge.[ch]xx and .../wxradar.[ch]xx.
It's used there, too.
m.
_
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 08 June 2006 20:07:
>> Here's a screeshot (for the lazy bums):
>>
>> http://members.aon.at/mfranz/hud.jpg [81 kB]
>
> I've now fixed the alpha problem and made the f16-hud transparent. This
> addresses Isao's valid complaints. The colors depe
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:01:37 +1200, dene wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Arnt,
>
> If you mean time and date headers that correspond to "Real-Time" for
> project teams developing "Live" like CD's they may cause
> problems..you and I and the rest of the project team want KOSH to be
>
Hi Arnt,
If you mean time and date headers that correspond to "Real-Time" for project
teams developing "Live" like CD's they may cause problems..you and I and the
rest of the project team want KOSH to be in the AirVenture configuration at
the moment... but "now" doesn't fall within the time/dat
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 22:35:02 -0400, Tony wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> not sure if folks on this list care, or are aware ... but Ben Supnik
> has made a couple of RFC type posts to one of the x-plane lists,
> talking about a new design for the airport data coming from Robin
> Peel.
>
>
Valid point Erik, I have run into a situation where a KOSH runway is 1/2
asphalt and 1/2 concrete...taking this to the nth degree a single runway
might need to be divided into n segments each of different function...as you
say " an asphalt runway with two concrete touchdown zones" or the KOSH
s
Is there anybody on this list who is (or will be) following this
discussion? There is one thing I would like to see added to this;
It becomes pretty common for (former) Military airports over here to
have an asphalt runway with two concrete touchdown zones giving best of
both worlds, low frict
* Olaf Flebbe -- Monday 29 May 2006 23:14:
> latest workarounds in tower are not quite correct. Please apply.
And what about the new ones ...?
#0 0x0e348130 in ?? ()
#1 0x080c4ada in FGTower::CheckCircuitList (this=0xed37920,
dt=0.30004) at src/ATC/tower.cxx:905
#2 0x080c7210 in F
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 08 June 2006 20:07:
> Here's a screeshot (for the lazy bums):
>
> http://members.aon.at/mfranz/hud.jpg [81 kB]
I've now fixed the alpha problem and made the f16-hud transparent. This
addresses Isao's valid complaints. The colors depend now on the background
and loo
25 matches
Mail list logo
