Maik Justus wrote:
What's about making a branch for the pre version and doing only
bufixes/testing on it? Porting of new functions only after announcing on
this list and testing on HEAD/PRE_OSG_PBLIB...?
So you propose to make a branch of the PLIB branch - right ? What do
you expect to
Hi Martin,
the idea is, not to add new functions to this branch, only bugfixes.
Adding of new functions only if they are tested in the actual
PRE_OSG_PLIB... branch and are announced on this list.
After the release this new branch should be read-only, as we have for
the other releases.
Maik
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying2.jpg
--- Olaf Flebbe wrote:
Hi,
snip
And BTW an inpolite request for including me in the Thanks.
Of course. How about the following:
Olaf Flebbe. Improved the build system for Windows and provided pre-built
dependencies and build packages.
I hope I haven't missed other contributions you have
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
--- Olaf Flebbe wrote:
Hi,
snip
And BTW an inpolite request for including me in the Thanks.
Of course. How about the following:
Olaf Flebbe. Improved the build system for Windows and provided pre-built
dependencies and build packages.
I hope I haven't missed
Hi Maik !
Maik Justus wrote:
[... separate PLIB (pre-)release branch ...]
the idea is, not to add new functions to this branch, only bugfixes.
Adding of new functions only if they are tested in the actual
PRE_OSG_PLIB... branch and are announced on this list.
After the release this new
Hi all,
I notice a patch wasn't apply correctly. in mathlib.cxx line 217, you can
found
matlib.cxx
// The StateSets aren't actually used by the light point
// implementation, but it's probably dangerous not to have
// something in the material.
===
and on line 276 :
1.26
Hi Didier,
are you sure this is in cvs? Or is it just the result of an update
failed on your computer. Try to delete the whole file and update again.
Maik
Didier Fabert schrieb am 17.05.2007 14:20:
Hi all,
I notice a patch wasn't apply correctly. in mathlib.cxx line 217, you can
found
On Thu 17 May 2007 12:40, George Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg
Hi Martin,
Martin Spott schrieb am 17.05.2007 13:33:
Hi Maik !
Maik Justus wrote:
[... separate PLIB (pre-)release branch ...]
the idea is, not to add new functions to this branch, only bugfixes.
Adding of new functions only if they are tested in the actual
PRE_OSG_PLIB... branch
Maik Justus wrote:
Martin Spott schrieb am 17.05.2007 13:33:
Active development should take place on the OSG-based HEAD only.
I am not sure if this is agreed by all developers.
Well, you'll never manage to get _all_ developers' agreement just on a
single tiny little topic, there will
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Martin.
P.S.: Just a joke
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote:
I get some messages about bugs. I fix it, and rewrite propeller pitch
mixture controls.
Everything's applied, the model now loads correctly for me without
crashing FlightGear (with latest OpenSceneGraph).
I'm not sure if the engine startup procedure of what is
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Martin.
P.S.: Just a joke
Ha! Actually, I'd expect someone from the Navy will be contacting the
FlightGear management,
On 5/17/07, gh.robin wrote:
On Thu 17 May 2007 12:40, George Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
On 5/16/07, Maik Justus wrote:
Is it possible to put this pre1 version onto the cvs-server? It would be
much easier for me, to switch my cvs checkouts to an other branch (or
even non-branch tag) than to set up a new directory tree for it.
I am not a cvs expert, but the PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029
On 5/16/07, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
And BTW an inpolite request for including me in the Thanks.
Hi Olaf, could you send me a 1 or 2 or 3 sentence summary of what you've
worked on. I know a few of the things, but I'm bound to miss something if I
attempt to write this myself. Feel free to send it
This email is a quick heads up of a new podcast style review of FlightGear
that is now available for your listening pleasure. It is clear that Dimitri
understands the nature and culture of the FlightGear project. He covers
most of the important features, and has many kind things to say. He
Martin Spott
Sent: 17 May 2007 15:33
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Martin.
P.S.: Just a joke
No - correct, or nearly so
Vivian
It's not a bug it's a feature! The carrier operates in the same frame of
reference as aircraft - it has to otherwise you couldn't catch wires
correctly. Unfortunately, the sea surface does not - elsewhere on the sea
surface you will see the carrier up to the sponsons in water. If you don't
crash
On Thursday 17 May 2007 15:39, Martin Spott wrote:
I'm not sure if the engine startup procedure of what is now in CVS
works correctly, could someone please verify ?
Yes, it starts fine here with CVS (plib branch). Thanks for committing, this
is a very nice addition for the new release.
AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 15:39, Martin Spott wrote:
Yurik: Would you mind me placing the description of the engine startup
procedure in 'an2.html' right underneath the screenshot of the 3D
cockpit - or, as an alternative, put the screenshot between the
explanation of the
On Tue 15 May 2007 00:32, Tim Moore wrote:
Howdy,
This patch implements the option of using OpenSceneGraph's osgViewer
instead of SDL or glut. The major user visible difference is the
availability of OSG statistics, as seen in
http://www.bricoworks.com/moore/osgstats.png, which show the time
Curtis Olson wrote:
Double check there isn't any x-plane 8.50 bezier stuff in the version we use
since we really aren't setup to use the new file format features yet.
Done, no v8.50 style runway definitions in the new file.
Well, Robin currently does not have a v8.50 file for download at all,
Hi,
On 5/17/07, AJ MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 15:39, Martin Spott wrote:
I'm not sure if the engine startup procedure of what is now in CVS
works correctly, could someone please verify ?
Yes, it starts fine here with CVS (plib branch). Thanks for committing,
Ok, thanks!
Curt.
On 5/17/07, Martin Spott wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
Double check there isn't any x-plane 8.50 bezier stuff in the version we
use
since we really aren't setup to use the new file format features yet.
Done, no v8.50 style runway definitions in the new file.
Well, Robin
Hi,
it's been a while since I posted in this list asking for some help with
the development of a client application to connect Flightgear to IVAO
servers.
Since then some important steps have been taken.
One of them has been the trust and support to the project shown by the
board of governors
Curtis Olson wrote:
Ok, thanks!
I just noticed that Robin 'forgot' to add several updates. Depending on
how fast he manages to add these now and get a new release out, I'd
probably add the missing bits to our list,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who
gh.robin wrote:
Hello Tim,
I spite of a very low fps with osg 1.9.4 (as i said before) i have built FG
with that patch, which works perfectly (but the cursor change, you are
working on it).
How may we understand the values which are given
Event
Update
Cull
Draw
Gpu
Are they percentage of
Le Thursday 17 May 2007 14:58:43 Maik Justus, vous avez écrit :
Hi Didier,
are you sure this is in cvs? Or is it just the result of an update
failed on your computer. Try to delete the whole file and update again.
Maik
Yes you're right, this lines isn't in the matlib.cxx since i have
Here's my self addition to the Thanks list
Syd Adams.
Added clipping to 2d instruments...
Added volume control to ATC-chatter...
Created and maintain...
DHC2
B1900D
Aerostar 700
S76C+ helicopter
Cessna Citation Bravo CitationX
A6M2 'Zero'
Assisted with Cessna Citation II with Curt
and
Hi All,
I have a patch available for the flash2a, so it works on the plib branch.
Available here:
http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/flash2a.diff.bz2
For some reason the patch is much bigger than expected, though the changes
are limited to removing some redundant models from the .ac file, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gh.robin wrote:
Hello Tim,
I spite of a very low fps with osg 1.9.4 (as i said before) i have built FG
with that patch, which works perfectly (but the cursor change, you are
working on it).
I'll turn this into a Wiki page if it gets taken
Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Wait for the tide to come in.
Jon
-
This
Curt,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv20201
Modified Files:
Thanks
Log Message:
Updates.
[...]
***
*** 226,231
made its gear aware of the surface material.
Wrote the Bo105 helicopter FDM
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I have a patch available for the flash2a, so it works on the plib branch.
Available here:
http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/flash2a.diff.bz2
Is the patch meant for PLIB only or for OSG as well ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective
Every one needs to make sure we are updating the version of the thanks file
in the source directory, so if changes were made elsewhere perhaps they
are getting overwritten? I haven't intentionally taken anything out, but I
have copied the version from the source directory around to the other
Hi Curtis,
You're writing about Thanks file and I did a code rewrite to the Jpeg screen
httpd streaming (--jpg-httpd option), in latest year and I'll be very
honored if my name appear in this file too, commenting about this
improvement to FlightGear project.
If you decide add a comment to
Hi Tim,
I took a peek at the diffs and had a couple questions. Originally the idea
of the fg_os files was to have a single interface within the flightgear code
so that the details could be hidden in fg_os.[ch]xx, but I see with your
changes that you have a lot of OSG specific code now that has
В сообщении от 17 Май 2007 21:39 Martin Spott написал(a):
Yurik: Would you mind me placing the description of the engine startup
procedure in 'an2.html' right underneath the screenshot of the 3D
cockpit - or, as an alternative, put the screenshot between the
explanation of the different
В сообщении от 18 Май 2007 00:40 K. Hoercher написал(a):
out, that the numbering of the flap gauge in the two pictures (2d, 3d)
included in the an2.html is inconsistent. While it is listed as #20
and that number depicts the rightmost gauge in a group of 3 in the 2d
jpg, the same number is
Hi Martin,
this information was twice in the file (Curt and Melchior added this
independent from each other nearly at the same time).
Thank you,
Maik
Martin Spott schrieb am 18.05.2007 01:54:
Curt,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source
In directory
42 matches
Mail list logo
