Re: [Flightgear-devel] terragear
Yesterday i tried to compile simgear-cs and i got this: Making all in debug make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user/Private/FlightGear/tg-simgear-cs/simgear/debug' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../simgear -I../..-g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -MT logstream.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/logstream.Tpo -c -o logstream.o logstream.cxx In file included from logstream.cxx:25: logstream.hxx: In member function ‘virtual int logbuf::overflow(int)’: logstream.hxx:184: error: ‘EOF’ was not declared in this scope make[3]: *** [logstream.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user/Private/FlightGear/tg-simgear-cs/simgear/debug' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/Private/FlightGear/tg-simgear-cs/simgear' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/Private/FlightGear/tg-simgear-cs/simgear' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Daniyar 17.11.09, 02:13, "Pete Morgan" : > Dont know if this is the right newsgroup, but am trying to compile > terragear. > Pulled from here > http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=terragear-cs;a=summary > Also simgear from here > http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=simgear-cs;a=summary > It configures ok but a compile error as below. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] sound system oddity
Alex Romosan writes: > this is with the f-16. while inside the cockpit then engine sound > changes depending on the heading of the aircraft. going west the sound > is very loud going east it's almost completely gone. as the plane turns > the sound gradually changes going either up or down depending on the > direction of the turn. hope this helps. that was at JFK. if i fly at EHAM the directions seem to be north-south, with south at no sound and north at maximum. strange. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] heads up -- effects for models
yeah glass and chrome effects are back to normal ... that was fast :) On 11/17/09, Martin Spott wrote: > Tim Moore wrote: >> On 11/16/2009 09:50 PM, Martin Spott wrote: > >>> The prop disc of the Seneca, when lit almost from the same direction as >>> viewed at (sitting in the cockpit, the sun in your back) now looks >>> pretty much like a hard disc. > >> I believe that updates to simgear and data fix this, but I admit that I >> don't >> have the patience to start the plane ;) Let me know if there are still >> problems. > > Looks pretty good to me after the latest update, > > Martin. > -- > Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! > -- > > -- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] heads up -- effects for models
Tim Moore wrote: > On 11/16/2009 09:50 PM, Martin Spott wrote: >> The prop disc of the Seneca, when lit almost from the same direction as >> viewed at (sitting in the cockpit, the sun in your back) now looks >> pretty much like a hard disc. > I believe that updates to simgear and data fix this, but I admit that I don't > have the patience to start the plane ;) Let me know if there are still > problems. Looks pretty good to me after the latest update, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Hansajet autopilot
Well, I have sent a message about that bug some time ago, but I would like to know if it has been worked on or not, maybe if the dev forgot that I sent that... :P The bug: The autopilot, when activated on NAV/heading hold mode, will cause the plane to do many barrel rolls. I think it's overshooting. BTW, I also filed a report for the Seneca II (autopilot issue, although not like this one), and it has been solved a some time ago :) -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] heads up -- effects for models
You were right, I just updated the data package and now everything works fine - I think ;) Thanks! BTW, so far I haven't had any problems with material animations. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] valgrind of fgfs windows build running on wine?
http://valgrind.org/downloads/variants.html http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine_and_Valgrind http://www.kegel.com/wine/valgrind/ -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple instances of given ai aircraft
Gijs de Rooy writes: > What I see on your pictures and know from my own encounters with such > aircraft is that they do not fly, as in "flying an airplane". They > just hover above the ground. if that's the case (and it seems to be because i looked and the airplane velocities and they were all 0) then it would make sense to draw the airplane only 30 mins before the scheduled departure date since it will eliminate all these conflicts (as i tried to do in my patch). unfortunately i still haven't seen any of those planes take off. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] heads up -- effects for models
On 11/16/2009 09:50 PM, Martin Spott wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Tim Moore wrote: > >> [...] I want to shake out what the changes may have broken first. Animations, >> particularly material animations, may very likely be messed up; please report >> any breakage. > > The prop disc of the Seneca, when lit almost from the same direction as > viewed at (sitting in the cockpit, the sun in your back) now looks > pretty much like a hard disc. > I'm uncertain if this is a flaw with your recent changes or in the > aircraft configuration, yet I think this looks a bit strange and did > not to so before your changes, > > Martin. I believe that updates to simgear and data fix this, but I admit that I don't have the patience to start the plane ;) Let me know if there are still problems. Tim -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple instances of given ai aircraft
Hi, > From: romo...@sycorax.lbl.gov > well, you get multiple aircraft flying together as one. i posted a > picture a while ago: To clear some things a little more up. What I see on your pictures and know from my own encounters with such aircraft is that they do not fly, as in "flying an airplane". They just hover above the ground. Multiple aircraft are loaded at the same parking area. Due to the solid AI models, they all try to get on top of eachother, causing them to climb into the air like "olleke-bolleke" (Durk knows what I mean ;) )... Cheers, Gijs _ Het laatste nieuws, shownieuws en voetbalnieuws op MSN.nl http://nl.msn.com/-- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple instances of given ai aircraft
Durk Talsma writes: > Just out of curiosity, is there a specific problem that you try to > address? I.e. a problem with multiple aircraft of the same call sign > in the property tree, and i forgot to mention, all the duplicate aircraft have the same call sign in the property tree and fly together as one as you can see in the pictures i mentioned in the previous post. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple instances of given ai aircraft
Durk Talsma writes: > Just out of curiosity, is there a specific problem that you try to > address? I.e. a problem with multiple aircraft of the same call sign > in the property tree, or multiple AI aircraft with similar call signs, > showing up on the radar? One thing that I noticed a while ago is that > all the inactive flights are still showing up on the radar. To prevent > this, we should probably deactivate the transponder of these inactive > aircraft. I'm not too familiar with the internal workings of the > radar, but I don't think that that should be too hard. well, you get multiple aircraft flying together as one. i posted a picture a while ago: http://caliban.lbl.gov/fgfs-weird.jpg and then two more taken yesterday: http://caliban.lbl.gov/fgfs-weird1.jpg http://caliban.lbl.gov/fgfs-weird2.jpg --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple instances of given ai aircraft
Hi Alex, On Tuesday 17 November 2009 03:19:59 am Alex Romosan wrote: > while flying out of jfk today i noticed once again multiple instances of > a given ai aircraft. looking at the properties tree i noticed that there > were multiple aircraft with the same call sign. after a bit of detective > work i noticed that the number of aircrafts corresponds to the number of > entries for that given aircraft in AI/Traffic. For example Delta0080 is > listed 7 times departing from jfk, once for each day of the week, and > that's how many aircraft were drawn on the screen. Your detective work is correct. The scheduler tries to assign flights to as many aircraft as possible. In the current AI traffic demo, I've predominantly specified flights to and from EHAM. In case of Aircraft based at JFK, this does indeed mean that the first aircraft is assigned today's return flight to EHAM, the second aircraft tomorrow's, etc etc. until all flights are assigned. > > which basically creates the AI model only if the departure time is 30 > mins or less from now. i don't know if this is the correct solution, but > i believe the reason we see multiple instances of a given AI aircraft is > because we draw a new plane for each entry in the schedule. hope this > helps. > The most "proper" way to fix this would be to define more flights, so that delta airlines would also fly to other destinations, which would significantly reduce the number of duplicate flight numbers. But, admittedly, that is a lot of work... Just out of curiosity, is there a specific problem that you try to address? I.e. a problem with multiple aircraft of the same call sign in the property tree, or multiple AI aircraft with similar call signs, showing up on the radar? One thing that I noticed a while ago is that all the inactive flights are still showing up on the radar. To prevent this, we should probably deactivate the transponder of these inactive aircraft. I'm not too familiar with the internal workings of the radar, but I don't think that that should be too hard. Hope this clarifies things a bit. Cheers, Durk -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] sound system oddity
this is with the f-16. while inside the cockpit then engine sound changes depending on the heading of the aircraft. going west the sound is very loud going east it's almost completely gone. as the plane turns the sound gradually changes going either up or down depending on the direction of the turn. hope this helps. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Link Error mostly with SGSampleGroup
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Alexander Jäger wrote: > hi everybody, > I don't know wether this is the right place to ask, but when trying to > compile (windows VS 2008 Prof) I get linking errors like the following: > > Most are about the SGSampleGroup > > 2>kr_87.obj : error LNK2001: Nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol ""public: > bool __thiscall SGSampleGroup::exists(class std::basic_string std::char_traits,class std::allocator > const &)" Verify you have simgear/sound/sample_group.cxx included in the sgsound library compilation. -- Csaba/Jester -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] boost library version
Yes, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=514CC37C-DA62-45F3-BC1F-1B929429B09C%40gmail.com&forum_name=flightgear-devel or you might get away with g++ 4.3 as hinted in the thread. Surely there is a way to upgrade separate packages in Ubuntu? I am using Snow Leopard on mac and Fedora as my linux flavour so cannot give details on upgrading boost on Ubuntu. The Net is your friend. Jari Diego Fernando Rodríguez Varón wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I was experiencing the segmentation fault reported by Nicolas before so I > just tried updating and compiling. But I get the following error: > > checking for boostlib >= 1.37.0... configure: error: We could not detect the > boost libraries (version 1.37 or higher). If you have a staged boost library > (still not installed) please specify $BOOST_ROOT in your environment and do > not give a PATH to --with-boost option. If you are sure you have boost > installed, then check your version number looking in . > See http://randspringer.de/boost for more documentation. > > I'm using Ubuntu 8.04 and the boostlib supported is 1.34. > So I had change the configure.ac file > AX_BOOST_BASE([1.34.0] > > Is flightgear stopping support for Hardy Heron? :( Hopefully not. > > Do I really need 1.37? > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > -- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > > > > > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Link Error mostly with SGSampleGroup
hi everybody, I don't know wether this is the right place to ask, but when trying to compile (windows VS 2008 Prof) I get linking errors like the following: Most are about the SGSampleGroup 2>kr_87.obj : error LNK2001: Nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol ""public: bool __thiscall SGSampleGroup::exists(class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > const &)" (?exi...@sgsamplegroup@@qae_nabv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@@Z)". 2>marker_beacon.obj : error LNK2001: Nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol ""public: bool __thiscall SGSampleGroup::exists(class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > const &)" (?exi...@sgsamplegroup@@qae_nabv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@@Z)". 2>navradio.obj : error LNK2001: Nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol ""public: bool __thiscall SGSampleGroup::exists(class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > const &)" (?exi...@sgsamplegroup@@qae_nabv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@@Z)". 2>AIManager.obj : error LNK2019: Verweis auf nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol ""public: __thiscall FGAIGroundVehicle::FGAIGroundVehicle(void)" (??0FGAIGroundVehicle@@q...@xz)" in Funktion ""public: void __thiscall FGAIManager::processScenario(class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > const &)" (?processscena...@fgaimanager@@qaexabv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@@Z)". 2>simgear.lib(soundmgr_openal.obj) : error LNK2019: Verweis auf nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol ""public: __thiscall SGSampleGroup::SGSampleGroup(class SGSoundMgr *,class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > const &)" (??0SGSampleGroup@@q...@pavsgsoundmgr@@abv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@@Z)" in Funktion ""public: class SGSampleGroup * __thiscall SGSoundMgr::find(class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > const &,bool)" (?f...@sgsoundmgr@@QAEPAVSGSampleGroup@@abv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@_...@z)". 2>C:\Users\Alexander\Flightgear\flightgear\projects\VC90\Win32\Release\fgfs.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 20 nicht aufgelöste externe Verweise. 2>Das Buildprotokoll wurde unter "file://c:\Users\Alexander\Flightgear\flightgear\projects\VC90\FlightGear\Win32\Release\BuildLog.htm" gespeichert. 2>FlightGear - 67 Fehler, 1 Warnung(en) thanks for all help greetings alex -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Automatically hide/show the menubar
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > > Hi, > > I just committed a featurette for the menubar which is disabled by > > default but > > can be enabled by setting /sim/menubar/autovisibility/enabled to true. > > Here's another random thought. I don't know if it would be any better or > not, but might be interesting for some situations. Right now we hide the > mouse pointer after 10 seconds of no mouse motion. It might be interesting > to hide the menu at the same time? This may not be optimal for those who > fly with the mouse, but could be useful for many other usage modes. Yep - that's probably a good idea. I'll try it out... > > It might make sense to make the F10 toggle work in partnership with the > auto-hider feature rather than keeping the functions totally separate? If > the auto-hide is turned on and the menu has become hidden, what happens > when someone presses F10? Should this make the menu visible and turn off > the auto-hide feature (at least for a while)? > > I'm worried that if auto-hide is enabled and someone presses F10 to toggle > the menu off, will the menu then not appear when you move the mouse to the > top of the screen? If someone inadvertently presses F10 and doesn't > realize it, the menu could be lost to them. I only worry about this > because I got a different keyboard about a year ago and I'm still forever > missing my intended key and hitting the wrong one ... especially when I'm > trying to focus on too many things at once ... like when I'm flying. :-) Currently, the F10 behaviour is completely unchanged. It toggles the visibility of the menubar, no matter if autovisibility is on or off. (Note: it's autovisibility, not autohide!). If you have autovisibility enabled and pop up the menubar with the mouse at the upper edge and it F10, the menubar hides again. The next moment you hit the upper edge again, the menubar unhides. The autovisibility only works in mouse mode 0 (arrow) mode, not in yoke or view panning mode. Torsten -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Automatically hide/show the menubar
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Hi, > I just committed a featurette for the menubar which is disabled by default > but > can be enabled by setting /sim/menubar/autovisibility/enabled to true. > > If enabled, the menubar is invisible and pops up when the mouse in mode 0 > hits > the upper edge of the fgfs window. It stays visible until the mouse clicks > somewhere outside the pui elements. Nothing new for x-plane users... > > Previous F-10 behaviour is untouched. > > Hope you like it. If so, it might be enabled by default in preferences.xml > some day. > Hi Torsten, Here's another random thought. I don't know if it would be any better or not, but might be interesting for some situations. Right now we hide the mouse pointer after 10 seconds of no mouse motion. It might be interesting to hide the menu at the same time? This may not be optimal for those who fly with the mouse, but could be useful for many other usage modes. It might make sense to make the F10 toggle work in partnership with the auto-hider feature rather than keeping the functions totally separate? If the auto-hide is turned on and the menu has become hidden, what happens when someone presses F10? Should this make the menu visible and turn off the auto-hide feature (at least for a while)? I'm worried that if auto-hide is enabled and someone presses F10 to toggle the menu off, will the menu then not appear when you move the mouse to the top of the screen? If someone inadvertently presses F10 and doesn't realize it, the menu could be lost to them. I only worry about this because I got a different keyboard about a year ago and I'm still forever missing my intended key and hitting the wrong one ... especially when I'm trying to focus on too many things at once ... like when I'm flying. :-) Thanks! Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] November T-Shirt Contest
Voting for the November t-shirt contest is underway over at the FlightGear Forums. If you haven't voted, now is your chance! Voting will end soon!!! http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=6352 Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] boost library version
Hello everyone. I was experiencing the segmentation fault reported by Nicolas before so I just tried updating and compiling. But I get the following error: checking for boostlib >= 1.37.0... configure: error: We could not detect the boost libraries (version 1.37 or higher). If you have a staged boost library (still not installed) please specify $BOOST_ROOT in your environment and do not give a PATH to --with-boost option. If you are sure you have boost installed, then check your version number looking in . See http://randspringer.de/boost for more documentation. I'm using Ubuntu 8.04 and the boostlib supported is 1.34. So I had change the configure.ac file AX_BOOST_BASE([1.34.0] Is flightgear stopping support for Hardy Heron? :( Hopefully not. Do I really need 1.37? Thanks for your help. -- "Computer science is not about computers any more than astronomy is about telescopes." E.W. Dijkstra (1930-2002) -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] heads up -- effects for models
Yeah, you're right, I didn't update the data directory. I don't do that often, because it takes ages for CVS to start update. Anyway, I'm going to update and then report the results. > On 11/17/2009 01:53 AM, Victhor Foster wrote: >> I am experiencing this bug: Some 3D objects/models are untextured, while >> some others are. There are two screenshots showing this bug on the links >> below. >> http://img163.imageshack.us/i/fgfsscreen021.png/ >> http://img163.imageshack.us/i/fgfsscreen020.png/ >> > Are there any objects that are textured in that screenshot? It looks to me > like you haven't updated the data directory from CVS. Otherwise, what hardware > and OS are you running? > > Tim >> >> >> -- >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> >> >> >> ___ >> Flightgear-devel mailing list >> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > > -- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] BUG - Evening, Rain, Propeller
Ron Jensen wrote: > It probably should be, but it could use some help at the moment. > > Step one should probably be cleaning all the stray shift-tabs in the xml > files and standardizing the indentation... > > I notice that c172p-set.xml has two separate sets of "model" tags... > > The -set files have created an ugly include chain, I don't believe one > set file should include another, if that is needed there should be a > "base" xml file both include, ala helijah's style. > > possibly the c172/ directory should be consolidated into c172p... Agreed, on all of them. Erik -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
