[Flightgear-devel] JSBSim turbulence models: revealing an almost hidden gem

Hi, I just commited a patch to make the JSBSim turbulence models selectable at runtime. The turbulence model can be selected by setting /environment/params/jsbsim-turbulence-model to either ttNone, ttStandard, ttBerndt, ttCulp, ttMilspec or ttTustin. The Milspec model is selected by default

[Flightgear-devel] jsbsim.cxx compile fail with VC++ 2010

Just a heads up for today´s Git update. JSBSim.cxx(732): error C3861: 'round': identifier not found Atmosphere-SetProbabilityOfExceedence( round(TurbulenceSeverityTable.GetValue( tmp ) ) Something else that is not in the MS version of the standard. ;-) Alan

Re: [Flightgear-devel] jsbsim.cxx compile fail with VC++ 2010

Just a heads up for today´s Git update. JSBSim.cxx(732): error C3861: 'round': identifier not found Atmosphere-SetProbabilityOfExceedence( round(TurbulenceSeverityTable.GetValue( tmp ) ) Something else that is not in the MS version of the standard. ;-) Thanks

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim turbulence models: revealing an almost hidden gem

Great! Thank you! I really like the turbulence model of JSBSim- feels much more realistic than the one from YASim. All the credit for the model goes to the excellent JSBSim devs. I just built the bridge that linked it into FG. Torsten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim turbulence models: revealing an almost hidden gem

Yes, right. I used the turbulence model already before, but now it is used automatically. It was just this bridge missing. Great! Thank you! I really like the turbulence model of JSBSim- feels much more realistic than the one from YASim. All the credit for the model goes to the excellent

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim turbulence models: revealing an almost hidden gem

Credit the new JSBSim milspec/tustin turbulence model to some great work by Andreas Gaeb last September. Jon Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on ATT Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de wrote: Great! Thank you! I really like the turbulence model of JSBSim- feels much more realistic than the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: fgdata merge request 76: Improvedairport Textures

I'm afraid that the improved textures really aren't an improvement. Not only do they not work for taxiways, we have also lost the chevrons at the threshold that were quite recently added: https://picasaweb.google.com/gijsrooy/FlightGearSkyopSTextures#5604420979421 192098 The grass isn't