I'm afraid that the "improved textures" really aren't an improvement. Not
only do they not work for taxiways, we have also lost the chevrons at the
threshold that were quite recently added:
https://picasaweb.google.com/gijsrooy/FlightGearSkyopSTextures#5604420979421
192098
The grass isn't much of an improvement either. On balance, this upload is a
regression. IMO we should back it out.
Vivian
-----Original Message-----
From: Durk Talsma [mailto:durkt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 May 2011 09:39
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: fgdata merge request 76:
Improvedairport Textures
Whoops,
should have been: (request #61).
https://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/merge_requests/61
(Need more coffee, need more coffee, need more coffeee . :-) )
D.
On 07 May 2011, at 10:35, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi all,
Going through the list of open merge requests for fgdata, I noticed that
this one is still open:
https://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/merge_requests/76
One person, other than the author commented positively on the new textures
in question (in addition to receiving generally positive comments on the
forum), so I would be inclined to accept this merge request, but I cannot
really judge if there are any side effects? Any objections?
Cheers,
Durk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
