On Sunday, June 19, 2011 09:58:48 AM Bertrand Coconnier wrote:
> 2011/6/19 Ron Jensen :
> > On Saturday 18 June 2011 21:00:41 Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> >> Here's an example from Hal's P-51D Mustang. This is from an old version,
> >> so it may have changed by now, but it illustrates the approach. In th
I wrote:
>
> ThorstenB wrote:
>
> ... snip ...
> >
> > So, I am really sorry, Vivian, that you were still unable to make the
> > system work for you - on day 2 (though it seems people only started
> > trying to use it _today_).
> >
> ... snip ...
>
> Getting back to the original purpose ... it'
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:52, Martin Spott wrote:
> This is the first time we're aiming at having one release every six
> months and not everything will be perfect on the first attempt. Anyhow
> I'm still proposing to let us familiarize ourselves with the
> implications of having a release plan inste
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I don't think there's a convincing reason why it can't wait until the next
> development cycle, but I was unclear as to whether aircraft were
> considered major features.
Ah, well, aircraft are a pretty prominent feature in flight simulation,
don't they ;-)
While we're
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Comments on the state of the c172 model went unheard for months,
> therefore I'd like to hear a really convincing reason why such major
> overhaul can't wait until the tree is open for the next development
> cycle.
Not quite unheard - just inc
Hi all,
> Stuart wrote:
>> Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective
> models (c172p, c150).
I need to correct that slightly. "All" I've been working on is a (c172p) new
panel
including the pedestal. There were a lot of faults and missing switches in the
previo
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective
> models (c172p, c150).
Comments on the state of the c172 model went unheard for months,
therefore I'd like to hear a really convincing reason why such major
overhaul can't wait until
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:18, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> No, not generally. Obvious fixes are ok, major overhauls are not, in
>> case of doubt I'd propose that the changes in question should be
>> reviewed (which is a darn good idea anyway ;-)
>
> Well, I _was_ planning to review the changes. :
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Martin Spot wrote:
> Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>
>>> Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
>>> to our streams. Please note: this includes fgdata, too!
> [...]
>> What's the po
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>> Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
>> to our streams. Please note: this includes fgdata, too!
[...]
> What's the position on aircraft updates?
They're part of "fgdata" ;-)
Ind
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Short version for the impatient reader:
> Please do _NOT_ push any major changes or new features to simgear,
> flightgear, fgdata until further advice!
> Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
> to our str
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 05:12:31 PM Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Sunday 19 June 2011 17:55:25 Hal V. Engel wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 19, 2011 02:15:54 PM Ron Jensen wrote:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg3
> > > 02
> > >
> > >08 .html gui.menuBind("radio", "d
On Sunday 19 June 2011 10:50:01 John Denker wrote:
> On 06/19/2011 06:46 AM, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > Maybe I've gone wrong somewhere here, but something similar might work.
> > Also, in situations like a flat spin or tail slide this probably falls
> > apart!
>
> Let's postpone discussion of exotic
Hal,
Works nicely here - I've just pushed an update into the TR1133.nas file
This is the line:
gui.menuBind("radio", "TR1133.radio_dlg.open()");
You should be able to adapt that to the SC-522
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: Hal V. Engel [mailto:hven...@gmail.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
