On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:18, Stuart Buchanan wrote: >> No, not generally. Obvious fixes are ok, major overhauls are not, in >> case of doubt I'd propose that the changes in question should be >> reviewed (which is a darn good idea anyway .... ;-) > > Well, I _was_ planning to review the changes. :) > > Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective > models (c172p, c150). > > I'll refrain checking them in until after 17th July then.
Given this is the first time we're running the new release process, I'd personally support accepting aircraft updates on a case-by-case basis, after a review of course. Of course sticking to a release schedule is also important, and this is just my opinion. Equally the C172p is most people's first impression of FG, and we're only three days into the freeze, so I think a little bit of 'slush-iness' is reasonable. Regards, James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
